Brown
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Craven
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Gilchrist
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government Exhibit 22
|
Subject of testimony |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DMV/DL (Department of Motor Vehicles/Driver's License)
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal case | Civil case cited as 'Brown v. Maxwell', where the Court released summary judgment material. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Brown regarding the New York State DMV 'compass database' and the a... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Brown in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony authenticating Government Exhibit 21 | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Brown regarding the procedures of the Department of Motor V... | Courtroom or legal proceeding | View |
| 2021-01-11 | Legal decision | Certiorari denied for United States v. Brown, 800 F. App’x 455 (9th Cir. 2020). | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal proceeding | In Brown v. Maxwell, third-party intervenors, including members of the press, appealed an order d... | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019) is cited as a reference for the nature o... | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 50 (2d Cir. 2019) is cited. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019) | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal ruling | A ruling was made in the case of Brown v. Maxwell. | Second Circuit | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019). | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-16 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Brown, 2008 WL 161146. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2002-04-26 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Brown, 2002 WL 34244994. | U.S. Court of Appeals for t... | View |
| 2002-04-26 | Legal case decision | Decision in the case of U.S. v. Brown. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Brown, 744 F. Supp. 558. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 1981-01-01 | Legal case | The Second Circuit declined to follow a Ninth Circuit precedent in the case United States v. Brown. | Second Circuit | View |
| 1981-01-01 | Court case | United States v. Brown, where the Second Circuit declined to follow Ninth Circuit precedent and r... | Second Circuit | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002946.jpg
This document is page 12 of a 239-page legal filing from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of authorities listing numerous U.S. court cases, with the United States as the plaintiff against various individual defendants. The page provides full legal citations for each case and indicates the page numbers within the main document where these authorities are referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00005873.jpg
This document is Page 6 of 43 from Exhibit 397-1, filed on October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a page from an academic text (page 961) titled 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse' which presents a table and analysis of various academic definitions and subtypes of 'grooming.' The text cites numerous researchers (Leberg, Craven, Salter, etc.) to discuss the psychological tactics involved in grooming, such as gaining trust and preventing disclosure, noting the difficulties in defining these terms for forensic use.
DOJ-OGR-00005908.jpg
This document, an excerpt from an academic review filed in a legal case, discusses the need for a clearer definition of sexual grooming of children. It proposes a new definition that encompasses preparing the child, adults, and environment for abuse, and critiques existing theories of child sexual abuse for largely ignoring the grooming phenomenon. The text emphasizes that a better understanding is crucial for effective legislation, prevention, and treatment, referencing the UK's Sexual Offences Act 2003 as an example of legislative action.
DOJ-OGR-00005872.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing an academic table titled "General Definitions of Grooming." The table lists various authors and their respective definitions of the term "grooming" in the context of child sexual abuse, spanning publications from 1982 to 2010.
DOJ-OGR-00005187.jpg
This handwritten legal document argues that Congress intentionally excluded specific child abuse definitions found in § 3509(a) when making technical corrections in 1994, suggesting these definitions apply to civil reporting rather than criminal statutes. The text cites legal precedents such as *Ibarra v. Holder*, *Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement*, and *Brown v. Gardner* to support principles of statutory interpretation regarding congressional intent and context.
DOJ-OGR-00033126.jpg
This document is page 138 of an index for a legal or official transcript, produced by the firm Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'Assessment' to 'case', along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains the transcription company's address in West Palm Beach, FL, and a Department of Justice (DOJ) document control number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720.jpg
This document is a single page (p. 220) from a scientific text discussing chaos theory, specifically algorithmic strategies for computing Lyapounov exponents in relation to neurobiological data. It cites numerous researchers (Wolf, Sano, Eckmann, etc.) and discusses mathematical concepts like the Rössler and Lorenz butterfly attractors. While it bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013720' stamp indicating it is part of a congressional document production (likely related to the Epstein investigation given the context of his interest in science funding), the text itself is purely academic and mentions no specific individuals, locations, or events directly connected to Epstein's criminal activities.
Direct Examination Testimony
Testimony regarding the verification process for obtaining identification cards at the DMV.
Process for obtaining an identification card from the Dep...
A witness named Brown, a supervisor/investigator, is questioned about the procedures for getting a DMV identification card. Brown explains that applicants must visit a DMV office, fill out an application, provide original documents (like social security cards, passports, or birth certificates), and have their photograph taken. The DMV verifies the information by checking the security features of the original documents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity