Virginia L. Giuffre
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-03 | Court order | The Court issued an order, pursuant to which the parties submitted disputes for resolution regard... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2017-05-25 | N/A | Filing of Complaint | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2017-01-01 | N/A | Scheduled trial date for the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-03-04 | N/A | Filing of Document 124-3 (Proposed Protective Order) | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2016-03-04 | Legal filing | A [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER was filed with the court in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghis... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2016-03-04 | N/A | Filing of Document 134-3 (Proposed Protective Order) | Southern District Of New York | View |
| 2016-03-02 | N/A | Document 39-1 filed with the court. | Southern District Of New York | View |
| 2016-02-05 | Legal notice | Plaintiff's Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell was issued. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002393.jpg
This document is the first page of a '[Proposed] Protective Order' filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order outlines protocols for handling confidential information during discovery, specifically citing the need to protect sensitive personal information relating to victims of sexual abuse. It emphasizes that confidentiality designations should be used sparingly and must be withdrawn if the material no longer qualifies for protection.
DOJ-OGR-00002384.jpg
This document is a proposed protective order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil lawsuit between Plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre and Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order aims to protect confidential information disclosed during discovery, such as details related to sexual abuse, trade secrets, or other sensitive material. It explicitly states that the order does not grant blanket protection and that any designation of material as confidential must be done sparingly and in good faith.
DOJ-OGR-00002384(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a Proposed Protective Order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (15-cv-07433-RWS) in the SDNY. The document outlines the limitations of confidentiality protections during discovery, specifically noting protections for sensitive personal information regarding sexual abuse victims. It includes visible track-changes/strikethroughs removing language about 'annoying' or 'embarrassing' parties, and contains formatting metadata on the right sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00002379(1).jpg
This document is a legal declaration by Sigrid S. McCawley, an attorney for the plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The declaration is in support of the plaintiff's response to a motion for a protective order filed by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley attests to the authenticity of three attached exhibits: a notice and re-notice for Maxwell's deposition, and an email from Maxwell's counsel, Laura Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00002372(1).jpg
This document is page 2 of a Protective Order filed on March 2, 2016 (stamped March 18, 2016) in the civil case Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order outlines rules to protect confidential information during the discovery process to prevent annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression of parties or witnesses. It defines the scope of materials covered, including documents, interrogatories, and depositions.
DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg
This page outlines the statement of the case and facts regarding Ms. Maxwell, detailing a six-count superseding indictment involving conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein and perjury. It also summarizes the background of the civil defamation case Giuffre v. Maxwell, which was settled and dismissed in 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00019390.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019325.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 12, 2020, in the civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Loretta A. Preska denies Defendant Maxwell's request for a three-week stay on the unsealing of documents, a request she based on the emergence of "critical new information" related to her separate criminal case. The court ruled that since Maxwell is bound by a protective order and cannot disclose this information, her unproven assertion ('ipse dixit') is not a compelling reason to grant the stay.
DOJ-OGR-00019288.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeals," submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 10, 2020. The motion concerns two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell as the Defendant-Appellant: one from a civil case (15-CV-7433) brought by Virginia L. Giuffre, and another from a criminal case (20-CR-330) brought by the United States of America, both originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017936.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, by Virginia L. Giuffre against Alan Dershowitz. It outlines the nature of the action, stating the suit arises from defamatory statements by Dershowitz, and details Giuffre's victimization by Jeffrey Epstein between 2000-2002. The document cites a 2016 order by Judge Marra describing Epstein's trafficking scheme and explicitly alleges that Dershowitz was one of the persons with whom Epstein acted in concert to abuse minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017935.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It establishes the case of Virginia L. Giuffre (Plaintiff) versus Alan Dershowitz (Defendant). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018031.jpg
Affidavit of David S. Stone in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Alan Dershowitz, filed April 16, 2019. Stone details his professional relationships with both Dershowitz and David Boies and describes facilitating meetings between them in May 2015 regarding sexual abuse allegations against Dershowitz. Stone explicitly refutes Dershowitz's claim that Boies stated during a May 19th meeting that Giuffre (referred to as Roberts) was 'mistaken' about the abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015532.jpg
This document is page 2 of a civil complaint filed on September 21, 2015, by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:15-cv-07433). The text outlines the nature of the action, alleging that Maxwell facilitated the sexual trafficking and abuse of Giuffre when she was a minor and subsequently defamed her by calling her a liar. It establishes jurisdiction in the Southern District of New York based on diversity of citizenship and Maxwell's residence in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014118.jpg
This document is a sealed declaration filed by attorney Sigrid McCawley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of plaintiff Virginia Giuffre. The declaration supports a motion to compel discovery from Jeffrey Epstein and authenticates four attached exhibits. These exhibits include redacted phone records, Jeffrey Epstein's contact list, message pad excerpts, and a document related to 'Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity