Trove
Sign In Sign Up

the parties

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
2
Events
29
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
6
2
View
organization The Court
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Jury selection Prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire and underwent in-person voir dire, after whi... N/A View
N/A Jury selection Prospective jurors completed a lengthy questionnaire and underwent in-person voir dire, from whic... N/A View
N/A Hearing A future public hearing is planned to inquire into whether Juror 50's answers were false. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A proposed brief hearing, outside the presence of the jury, to examine Mr. Glassman about his com... Court View
N/A N/A Hearing where Juror 50 may be a witness The Court View
N/A Court hearing A hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50, mentioned in a footnote. District Court View
N/A N/A Jury Selection Process (Questionnaire and Voir Dire) Southern District of New York View
N/A Agreement between parties The legal parties in the case conferred and agreed to offer a redacted version of Government Exhi... N/A View
N/A N/A Submission of joint list by parties Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A pretrial conference where the Court informed the parties of its decision to release Mr. Robertson. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding / trial Discussion of procedures for providing trial exhibits (slides) to the public following closing ar... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The closing arguments of a trial, during which the parties present their final case to the jury. courthouse View
2025-11-16 Proposed meeting The judge proposed holding the charge conference on either the evening of the 16th or on Saturday... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Meeting The Court proposes a sidebar meeting with the parties to discuss how to address the jury regardin... Courtroom View
2022-03-01 Legal filing deadline Deadline for parties to submit proposed questions for the inquiry into Juror 50. N/A View
2022-02-25 Deadline Deadline (by noon) for the parties to inform the Court whether they seek limited redactions to th... N/A View
2022-02-25 N/A Deadline for redaction requests N/A View
2022-02-22 N/A Deadline for parties to re-submit revised redactions via email N/A View
2021-12-20 Court proceeding Presentation of closing arguments and jury instructions. courtroom View
2021-12-20 Legal proceeding Presentation of closing argument and jury instructions scheduled for the day after the document w... courtroom View
2021-12-20 Proposed action The parties propose to provide a copy of their presentation slides, without sealed material, to t... N/A View
2021-11-22 N/A Deadline to file proposed redactions on public docket Court Docket View
2021-10-22 N/A Filing of document requesting jury questions Federal Court (Case 1:20-cr... View
2021-10-21 N/A Court proceedings referenced in transcript Southern District of New York View
2021-10-12 Legal filing The date on which the parties were to submit a joint letter to the Court with an estimate of the ... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009017.jpg

This is page 16 of 66 from a court filing (Document 613) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The visible text discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a 50-question questionnaire. The document contains significant redactions, obscuring specific details about the jury selection process or specific juror information.

Court filing / legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005280.jpg

This document is Page 4 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains preliminary instructions for prospective jurors regarding a questionnaire, emphasizing the legal requirement to provide truthful answers under oath. The text explicitly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, using social media (citing Facebook and Twitter) to communicate about it, or conducting independent research.

Court filing - juror questionnaire instructions
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
13
As Recipient
6
Total
19

List of places and entities

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

The parties submitted a list of witnesses and entities to the Court the previous night for use in the voir dire process.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell's bail hearing

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

Before Maxwell's bail hearing, the parties filed extensive written submissions.

Written submissions
N/A
Communication Source

Draft Charge

From: THE COURT
To: the parties

The judge circulated a draft charge to the parties which was docketed the previous night.

Draft circulation
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Proposed redacted exhibits

From: the parties
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach anticipates that the parties will provide a letter to the court later in the day detailing the proposed redacted exhibits for the closing arguments.

Letter
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Proposed redacted exhibits

From: the parties
To: The Court (implied)

Mr. Rohrbach anticipates that the parties will provide a letter to the court later in the day detailing the proposed redacted exhibits for the closing arguments.

Letter
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Proposed questions for inquiry

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

The Court ordered the parties to submit proposed questions via email on or before March 1, 2022, for an inquiry into Juror 50's answers.

Email
2022-03-01
Communication Source

Redaction requests

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

Notification if either party seeks limited redactions to the Opinion & Order.

Submission
2022-02-25
Communication Source

Order regarding redactions

From: THE COURT (Judge Nathan)
To: the parties

Directed parties to submit proposed redactions by Jan 13, 2022.

Order
2022-01-12
Communication Source

Juror communications

From: THE COURT
To: the parties

Informed parties of the Jan 5 juror communication.

Sealed order
2022-01-06
Communication Source

Juror contact

From: THE COURT
To: the parties

Informed parties that a juror contacted staff about reporter approach.

Sealed order
2021-12-31
Communication Source

Authority for positions on inconsistent statements

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

Ordered submission citing authority for respective positions and indicating disputed statements.

Letter
2021-12-16
Communication Source

Estimate of trial length

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

A comment indicates that the parties involved in the case were to submit a joint letter to the Court on October 12, 2021, to provide an estimated length for the trial.

Letter
2021-10-12
Communication Source

Estimate of the trial length

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

A comment on the document indicates that the parties involved in the case will submit a joint letter to the Court on October 12, 2021, to provide an estimate of how long the trial is expected to last.

Joint letter
2021-10-12
Communication Source

Trial Length Estimate

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

Mentioned in Comment [A11] as a future/past action to estimate trial length.

Joint letter
2021-10-12
Communication Source

ECF No. 53

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

A letter from the parties to the court, dated May 21, 2021, which prompted this order for a video hearing.

Letter
2021-05-21
Communication Source

Proposed redactions and their justification

From: the parties
To: THE COURT

The Court ordered the parties to submit a joint letter by December 30, 2020, regarding any proposed redactions.

Joint letter
2020-12-30
Communication Source

Maxwell's bail hearing

From: the parties
To: Judge Nathan

Judge Nathan heard lengthy oral argument from the parties during the bail hearing.

Oral argument
2020-07-14
Communication Source

Ruling on Speedy Trial Act motion

From: THE COURT
To: the parties

The Court grants the government's motion, finding that the adjournment until July 31 at 11:00 a.m. is appropriate and warrants exclusion from speedy trial calculations to prevent a miscarriage of justice and ensure effective representation.

Court dialogue
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Scheduling of a conference

From: THE COURT
To: the parties

The Court proposes scheduling a conference for Wednesday, July 31, at 11:00 a.m. and tentatively sets it for that time.

Court dialogue
2019-07-26
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search