Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Everdell

Person
Mentions
1327
Relationships
118
Events
605
Documents
644
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
118 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
16 Very Strong
35
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
13
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
12 Very Strong
12
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
196
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
22
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
28
View
person the Judge
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Chapell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Mr. Visoski
Legal representative
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Espinosa
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross Examination of Tracy Chapell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing or appeal arguments (Case 22-1426). Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Examination of Lawrence Visoski Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Rule 29 Argument Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury instructions and a question asked by the jury. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing / Pre-sentencing argument Southern District of New Yo... View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Patrick McHugh Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kelly Maguire Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding supplemental jury instructions Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of David Rodgers Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court ruling on the 'attorney witness issue' regarding the defense case-in-chief. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding Maxwell's sentencing or appeal points concerning her role in the conspiracy. Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R Courtroom View
N/A N/A Extension of Jury Deliberations New York City Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conference between Defense and Government Courtroom (implied) View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury questions and instructions for Count Four. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Trial Resumption Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Michael Dawson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury instructions and admissibility of testimony for conspiracy counts. Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00018308.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a cross-examination involving 'Parkinson,' dated August 10, 2022. The discussion centers on a diagram of a house, specifically its foyer and staircase. Mr. Everdell requests to display Government Exhibits 235 and 292, which the Court approves, indicating a transition in the presentation of evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018305.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning focuses on establishing the layout of a house, specifically identifying the 'lake room' as the location where money was taken and contrasting its position with a 'staff room'. A diagram of the house's second floor, labeled Government Exhibit 297, is introduced as evidence during the testimony.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018304.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning focuses on a floor plan, identifying a 'staff room' and a 'lake room'. The 'lake room' is established as the location of Mr. Epstein's desk, from which the witness indicates money was taken.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018303.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning focuses on the floor plan of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence, specifically identifying a 'staff' room located near the kitchen, which is identified in Government Exhibit 238 as a small office. Attorneys Everdell and Comey discuss the admissibility of Exhibit 238 with the Judge.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018296.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson (likely a police officer) by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony covers Parkinson's early interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, specifically a burglary investigation in October 2003 and casual encounters seeing Epstein jogging in Palm Beach. It concludes by introducing the topic of a search warrant executed on October 20, 2005.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018295.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. Parkinson testifies about a visit of under four hours to a residence on October 5, 2003, to speak with Mr. Epstein, and denies knowing or seeing Ghislaine Maxwell there. An attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully objects to a question about a burglar on the grounds of relevance and hearsay.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018293.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony focuses on a past meeting between Parkinson and Jeffrey Epstein at Epstein's house, specifically in his main office. They discuss a burglary incident where Epstein alleged that cash was stolen from a bag near his desk.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018292.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The witness confirms meeting with Mr. Epstein at his residence on a Sunday morning to discuss a burglary, where Epstein claimed several thousand dollars in cash were stolen. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, attempts to introduce evidence, but the court states that one of the exhibits is under seal.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018289.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of a cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning centers on Mr. Parkinson's participation in executing a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence at 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018287.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the admission of 'Exhibit 51' without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell. Prosecutor Ms. Comey subsequently requests that Detective Byrne come forward to set up and publish the exhibit for the jury.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018286.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Mr. Parkinson. Parkinson identifies Government Exhibit 51 as a massage table that he personally seized from a bathroom at 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005. The government, represented by Ms. Comey, successfully offers the table into evidence without objection from Mr. Everdell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018284.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Witness Parkinson is being questioned by Ms. Comey regarding a photograph (Government Exhibit 285) showing a desktop in a bathroom anteroom at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The exhibit is admitted under seal to protect a party's interests, preventing the witness from reading specific writing on the picture aloud in open court.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018279.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a trial on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Comey questions a witness, Mr. Parkinson, about an exhibit, Government 278. Mr. Parkinson identifies the exhibit as a fair and accurate photograph of the shower room at 358 El Brillo Way as it looked on October 20, 2005, after which Ms. Comey offers it into evidence without objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018278.jpg

This document is page 177 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence, specifically 'school costumes' and photographs thereof. The Judge rules that a foundation must be laid through a witness, suggesting Special Agent Maguire for this purpose. Following the ruling, the jury is recalled and a witness named Mr. Parkinson takes the stand.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018277.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the Court, Ms. Moe, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey regarding the relevance of photographs, prior testimony by Jane, and the submission of evidence binders for upcoming witnesses. The Court also provides a reminder to Ms. Comey about microphone usage.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018276.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the admissibility of photographs. The core issue is the lack of a proper foundation for the evidence, as the expected witness, Jane, did not testify, and there is a significant time gap of approximately 25 years between the events she allegedly witnessed (c. 1994-1995) and a 2019 search.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018275.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal dispute where prosecutors Ms. Moe and Ms. Comey request to brief an issue regarding photographic evidence, accusing the defense of 'sandbagging' by objecting late. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell denies the accusation, while the Judge notes a 'factual disjointedness' regarding the evidence.

Court transcript (trial proceedings)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018272.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding the admissibility of photographs of a 'New York house' (implied to be Epstein's). The prosecution argues the photos corroborate the testimony of a witness named 'Jane,' who described specific decor (nude artwork, animal decorations, and a red massage room) present during her visits between 1994 and her early twenties.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018271.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves the Judge, Prosecutor Ms. Moe, and Defense Attorney Mr. Everdell discussing procedural matters regarding the sealing of documents and objections to specific evidence (the '900 series' exhibits). Mr. Everdell notes that these objections relate to a search conducted in 2019 and will become relevant when Agent Maguire testifies to introduce the exhibits.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018270.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge, a government attorney (Ms. Comey), and a defense attorney (Mr. Everdell). They discuss the witness schedule, anticipating finishing with Mr. Parkinson and calling Agent Maguire next. The attorneys also address the handling of evidence, including redacting a video and the incomplete process of dedesignating photos, before the court calls for a recess.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018262.jpg

This court transcript excerpt from August 10, 2022, details a portion of a direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The government's attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully admits exhibits 289 through 293 into evidence, which are said to accurately depict the second floor of a house at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. After the exhibits are admitted without objection, Ms. Comey begins questioning the witness about their contents.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018258.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The testimony concerns photographs (Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254) depicting the interior of 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The exhibits are admitted into evidence under seal to protect the privacy of third parties.

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018256.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson, during which Ms. Comey (Government) moves to admit Government Exhibits 243 through 250 under seal. The Court admits the evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and the jurors are instructed to review Exhibits 243, 244, 245, and 246 in their binders.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018255.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson. He identifies a series of photographs (Government Exhibits 243-250) as accurately depicting the interior of a property at 358 El Brillo Way as it appeared on October 20, 2005. The government's attorney, Ms. Comey, offers the exhibits into evidence under seal, and the opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell, states he has no objection.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018249.jpg

This document is page 148 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson by prosecutor Ms. Comey, specifically focusing on the admission and presentation of Government Exhibits 223, 224, and 225 to the jury without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The page concludes with Ms. Comey preparing to show the witness Exhibits 226 through 241.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
109
As Recipient
10
Total
119

Admission of evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Everdell moves for the admission of Defendant's Trial Exhibit B.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admission of evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Everdell moves for the admission of Defendant's Trial Exhibit B.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Response to a juror's note

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Mr. Everdell argues that the answer to the jurors' question should be 'no', based on his interpretation of their note and the court's instructions regarding the purpose of travel.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scope of cross-examination for witness Ms. Espinosa

From: Mr. Everdell
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Everdell informs the court about an agreement reached with the government to not cross-examine the first witness, Ms. Espinosa, about a civil lawsuit involving Ms. Galindo and Epstein.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redactions in documents

From: Mr. Everdell
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Everdell agreed with the Court's assessment regarding the permissibility of naming individuals not granted anonymity.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Acknowledgement of court's instructions.

From: Mr. Everdell
To: ["The Court"]

Mr. Everdell confirms to the Court that the instructions are 'Totally clear' and states that the government has been provided with copies of the '3500 material'.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural point on cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell raises a concern about the government referring to passengers as 'and others' without naming them during direct examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Issue with fourth witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Mr. Everdell informs the court of a small issue regarding the fourth witness (Mr. Rogers) and requests time to confer with the government.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling of Defense Case

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the timeline for the defense to present their case and the scheduling of the charging conference.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Technical Issues

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the definition of 'entice' and citations of case law.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Verdict Sheet Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the phrasing of Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six, specifically regarding the age of victims and the name 'Jane'.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Visoski

Questioning regarding whether the witness saw any inappropriate activity during 30 years of employment.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Ms. Chapell

Questioning regarding FedEx invoices and their maintenance in the regular course of business.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

TECS Reports

From: Mr. Aznaran
To: Mr. Everdell

Confirmation that Aznaran ran three traveler reports in the TECS system for Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibits 234 and 245

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion regarding photos of Epstein's desk and bookcase.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Juror Exhibits

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Request to put folders with exhibits under jurors' chairs.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Logistics

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Discussion regarding the handling of paper evidence binders and maintaining witness anonymity during cross-examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the admissibility of property ownership records to impeach witness testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Calling next witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell calls Raghu Sud to the stand.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to scope of questioning

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the relevance of Maxwell's father's death and her housing history.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instruction Dispute

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding how to answer a jury question about conspiracy in Counts One and Three.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit Identification

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Inquiry about trial mark for the 1996 London home sale agreement.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding search video

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion of Government Exhibit 296 showing a property search.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Rodgers

Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Charge Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the specific wording of sex trafficking charges and conspiracy counts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search