Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-11 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 598 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, stating no redactions are sought for juror ques... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-11 | Legal document service | A memorandum was served via ECF (Electronic Case Filing). | N/A | View |
| 2022-02-09 | Legal filing | Electronic filing of "Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial". | Court (SDNY) | View |
| 2022-02-02 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office submitted a document requesting the Court to deny a defendant... | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-02 | N/A | Submission of Government's conclusion regarding defendant's motion for a new trial | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-01-19 | Legal filing | Electronic filing of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion for a New Trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-10 | Court filing | A document was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE stating the defense's agreement with the governmen... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-01-05 | N/A | Filing of Document 568 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-29 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE,... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-28 | Jury trial | Court proceedings for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-27 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 20 CR 330 (AJN). | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-21 | Court filing | Document 558 was filed in case 20-cr-00602-ABN. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-21 | Jury trial | Jury trial proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-12-19 | Legal filing | The Government submitted a letter to the Court regarding the submission of exhibits GX 603-A and ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-19 | Court filing | Document 558 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal filing | Signing of a legal document by the prosecution and defense attorneys in the case of Ghislaine Max... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | Legal filing | Document 549 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-17 | N/A | Filing of Document 550 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-15 | Court filing | Document 546 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-15 | Court filing | Document 545 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-12 | N/A | Filing of Document 539 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-11 | Court filing | Document 538 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000470.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman, filed on July 17, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claim that an expired Austrian passport was never used, presenting evidence of travel stamps to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia from the 1980s. The government also highlights that Epstein has not clarified how he obtained the passport or if he holds citizenship or residency in any other country.
DOJ-OGR-00000442.jpg
This legal document, dated July 16, 2019, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman. The prosecution argues for the continued pre-trial detention of the defendant, citing the recent discovery of over $70,000 in cash, 48 loose diamonds, and a large diamond ring in a safe at the defendant's Manhattan residence. The government contends these assets demonstrate the defendant has the capability to flee the jurisdiction and should therefore not be released.
DOJ-OGR-00000385.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case *United States v. Jeffrey Epstein*. The prosecution requests the exclusion of speedy trial time for the period of July 15-18, 2019, noting that Epstein's defense counsel consents to the request. The document is endorsed by Judge Berman, who granted the application on July 16, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000384.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 15, 2019, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, to Judge Richard M. Berman. The letter formally requests the exclusion of speedy trial time in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein for the period between July 15 and July 18, 2019. The filing notes that Epstein's defense counsel, Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, have been consulted and consent to the request.
DOJ-OGR-00000352.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 10) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated July 8, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The Government argues that the defendant should be denied bail because he poses an 'extraordinarily real' flight risk due to his vast wealth, private planes, and foreign contacts, and is a danger to the community due to his alleged abuse of dozens of underage girls and history of witness tampering. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey on behalf of US Attorney Geoffrey Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00000328.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 11, 2019, from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Richard M. Berman in the Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490), requesting an adjournment of a bail hearing. The document includes a handwritten order by Judge Berman dated July 12, 2019, denying the application and noting it is 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.' The letter is signed by AUSAs Rossmiller, Moe, and Comey, and copies defense counsel Weinberg and Weingarten.
DOJ-OGR-00000324.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal letter filed on July 11, 2019, in Case 1:19-cr-00490 (USA v. Epstein). The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is requesting Judge Richard M. Berman to adjourn a bail hearing to a later date to allow the Court time to review the Government's reply. The letter is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Rossmiller, Moe, and Comey, and copied to defense counsel Weinberg and Weingarten.
DOJ-OGR-00000004.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated September 17, 2024, concerning the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution (Appellee) and the defense (Appellant), and summarizes that Maxwell is appealing her June 29, 2022, conviction and sentencing by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on charges including conspiracy and sex trafficking of a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00020856.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.
DOJ-OGR-00020727.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, involving the USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a series of legal filings, primarily letters and motions, entered on July 12, 2022, from both the prosecution (USA) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings, dated from late 2021, cover various pre-trial issues such as witness testimony, expert disclosures, and jury instructions, and the log also notes the deletion of a sealed document that was filed in error.
DOJ-OGR-00020726.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), generated on February 28, 2023. It lists entries 700 through 711, all entered on July 12, 2022, which document various letters and motions exchanged between the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel (Menninger, Pagliuca, Everdell) and Judge Alison J. Nathan during late 2021. Key topics include an arrest warrant for Kelly Bovino, testimony of Stephen Flatley, motions to preclude defense witnesses, and issues regarding video monitors and prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020723.jpg
A page from a court docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from June 25-26, 2022. The entries include motions regarding victim impact statements, letters from defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim and the USA, and judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning sentencing procedures and the defendant's access to legal materials at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020722.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from June 22 to June 24, 2022. It details the procedural skirmishes leading up to sentencing, specifically regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the admissibility of victim impact statements. The judge orders the inclusion of statements from seven individuals, explicitly naming Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, while denying defense requests for redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020720.jpg
This court docket page from the SDNY details proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between April and June 2022. Key entries include an April 29 opinion where Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion for acquittal but granted a motion regarding 'multiplicity,' resulting in convictions being consolidated into Counts Three, Four, and Six. The document explicitly links Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein as a 'continuous coconspirator' in grooming and abusing underage girls. It also documents scheduling for her sentencing on June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00020719.jpg
This document is a court docket report for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering March 15 to April 26, 2022. Major events include the denial of Maxwell's motion for a new trial following allegations regarding Juror 50's non-disclosure of prior abuse, which the court deemed not deliberate. The docket also details administrative corrections regarding judge assignment, the scheduling of the sentencing for June 28, 2022, and the establishment of deadlines for the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR).
DOJ-OGR-00020716.jpg
This document represents a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 25 and March 3, 2022. The entries focus heavily on post-trial motions regarding 'Juror 50', who was scheduled for a hearing on March 8, 2022. Key developments include Juror 50's attorney notifying the court that the juror intended to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Government's subsequent notification that they were seeking approval to compel the juror's testimony via immunity orders (18 U.S.C. §§ 6002 and 6003).
DOJ-OGR-00020714.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 24, 2022. It contains a significant Order (Entry 610) by Judge Alison J. Nathan granting a post-verdict evidentiary hearing to investigate whether 'Juror 50' failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, citing media interviews given by the juror. The document also notes administrative motions to intervene and a letter from the prosecution team (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00020713.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between February 11 and February 24, 2022. It details motions for a new trial filed by the defense, communications regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity (specifically Juror 50), and the granting of an amicus curiae brief. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (USA), the defense team (Sternheim, Everdell), and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020710.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from January 14, 2022, to January 26, 2022. Key events include Judge Nathan scheduling Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and granting an exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act until April 2022 to allow for post-trial motions. The docket also records various letters from media organizations (Miami Herald, ABC, NBC, NY Times) regarding the unsealing of documents related to Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020709.jpg
This document contains a series of docket entries from January 2022 in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily concern 'Juror Number 50,' who retained private counsel (Todd Spodek) regarding a potential post-trial inquiry into juror misconduct or eligibility. Judge Nathan issued orders managing the scheduling of motions, addressing the juror's request to intervene, and handling the sealing and redaction of the juror's questionnaire and voir dire records.
DOJ-OGR-00020708.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log detailing proceedings in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 27, 2021, and January 5, 2022. It records the conclusion of the jury trial, the guilty verdict on multiple counts, and subsequent orders regarding post-trial motions and scheduling. Additionally, it notes correspondence regarding juror issues and a request for a vaccine booster for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020707.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 19, 2021, to December 22, 2021. It details various motions, orders regarding public access to trial exhibits and closing arguments, and minute entries for the jury trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity