| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brad Edwards
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wendy Olsen
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Shared experience |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Recruitment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor affected parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Use of VNS for victim notification | USA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ongoing course of conduct involving illegal or commercial sex acts. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' lawsuit against Dershowitz | Legal proceedings (mentione... | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI case agents hand-delivered letters to victims during interviews, as directed by Villafaña. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein victim services meeting | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government Interviews | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case and nonprosecution agreement controversy | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims recently refiled documents omitting stricken portions per DE 325. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deaths of several victims by suicide, drug overdose, or tragic circumstances. | Various | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked and enticed victims to recruit other girls | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Processing of victims upon arrival at mansion | Epstein's Palm Beach Mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse incidents | Bedroom with massage table,... | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court finding that USAO violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial in which Juror 50 served as a juror, which inspired him to disclose his own past abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Trip | Victims traveling to meet the defendant and Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | Flights on Epstein's private planes. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Facilitation of exploitation of minors. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR conducted an extensive investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, reviewing documen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Ghislaine Maxwell's sex-trafficking trial, which lasted four weeks. | lower Manhattan | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A bail hearing is mentioned where victims have been given the opportunity to testify. | court | View |
| N/A | Grand jury proceedings | Grand jury testimony was offered in connection with charges proposed against Epstein and Maxwell.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Maxwell's trial, during which certain aspects and subject matters of the grand jury transcripts b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Civil litigation | Some victims made their factual accounts public in the course of civil litigation. | N/A | View |
This is page 6 of a court filing (Document 36) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 30, 2020. The document outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery, specifically regarding the protection of PII for victims and witnesses, while noting that victims who have publicly identified themselves on the record are exempt from this confidentiality. It also establishes the procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge confidentiality designations made by the Government.
This document is Page 5 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols prohibiting the Defense team and potential witnesses from publicly disclosing the identities of victims or witnesses found in discovery materials, mandating that such references in court filings be made under seal.
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the second page of a declaration by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller. It outlines a disagreement between the U.S. Government and the defense regarding proposed restrictions on the public identification of victims and witnesses in the case. The document specifies the conflicting paragraphs in the proposed orders from both sides and references an accompanying letter for the Government's full reasoning.
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, defines what constitutes "Confidential Information" provided by the Government during discovery. It specifies that materials containing personal information of victims and witnesses are to be marked confidential, but also establishes a procedure for Defense Counsel to challenge this designation if they disagree, potentially leading to a motion to de-designate the materials.
This document is page 5 of a court order (Document 33-1) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 28, 2020. The order restricts the defense team and other authorized persons from publicly disclosing or filing the identities of victims and witnesses found in discovery materials. Such information must be filed under seal unless specific written authorization is granted by the Government or the Court.
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 27, 2020. It outlines protocols for handling 'Confidential Information' during the discovery process, specifically defining what constitutes confidential material and how personal identification of victims and witnesses must be protected. It also notes that victims or witnesses who have publicly identified themselves are not subject to these specific confidentiality restrictions.
This legal document, filed on December 18, 2020, is a court motion arguing that victims' accounts against an unnamed defendant are strongly corroborated by both witnesses and documentary evidence. The filing asserts that this evidence will prove the victims interacted with both the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein, particularly when some victims were minors. It also addresses a complaint from the defense's 'Renewed Bail Motion' regarding the sufficiency of the evidence produced.
This legal document discusses the corroboration of victims' accounts against a defendant involved in Epstein's criminal scheme to sexually abuse minors. It addresses the defense's arguments regarding the sufficiency of evidence and witness testimony, asserting that multiple victims will provide consistent testimony about the defendant's role in grooming and enticing minor girls. The document also notes that the defendant has abandoned certain legal challenges related to bail after receiving discovery.
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the government's argument for detaining a defendant pending trial. The government's representative, Ms. Moe, asserts the defendant is an extreme flight risk, citing her possession of three passports, large sums of money, and international connections. The court clarifies that the government's argument is based solely on flight risk and not on any danger the defendant poses to the community.
This page is from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 2, 2020, arguing for the defendant's detention pending trial. The government argues that despite COVID-19 concerns, the defendant should remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) like other inmates, citing her significant assets, foreign ties, and history of evading detection as flight risks. The document also introduces an argument based on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that victims and their counsel have been contacted and seek her detention.
This document is page 3 of a legal filing in the case regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490), dated August 5, 2025. It argues for strict adherence to grand jury secrecy rules (Rule 6(e)) to protect the privacy of victims, many of whom were minors at the time of abuse. The filing outlines specific requested relief, including requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, conducting judicial in camera reviews of materials, and allowing victims' counsel to review proposed redactions prior to any public release to prevent re-identification.
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 66) in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. It argues factors regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, noting that Epstein is deceased and Maxwell is incarcerated. It states that victim testimony at Maxwell's trial was consistent with law enforcement testimony given to the grand jury and that the government is unaware of any impermissible leaks of the transcripts.
This court document, filed on July 22, 2025, orders the Government to file a memorandum of law and submit Epstein grand jury transcripts under seal by July 29, 2025. The Court also sets a deadline of August 5, 2025, for a submission from Epstein's representative and notes that it has not yet received input from victims regarding the potential unsealing of materials.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated 2019-09-03, detailing a witness's testimony about a traumatic encounter with Mr. Epstein. The speaker recounts how an 'audition' turned into a 'casting call for prostitution' and mentions Mr. Epstein's connections to powerful individuals like Bill Clinton. The court also expresses gratitude to all participants, victims, and attorneys for their contributions to the hearing and proceedings.
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in which a representative for the government addresses the court regarding the victims in the case. The speaker confirms that efforts were made to notify all known victims of the proceeding, in compliance with the Crimes Victims' Rights Act, and notes that both the U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI have been in contact with them. The government also commits to continuing to provide services to the victims even if the indictment is dismissed.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government is addressing the court, stating that despite the dismissal of the indictment, related investigations and the possibility of civil asset forfeiture will continue. The speaker also confirms that defense counsel is complying with a protective order to return discovery materials and reaffirms the government's commitment to the victims of the case.
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.
A court order issued by Judge Richard M. Berman on August 21, 2019, scheduling a hearing for August 27, 2019, regarding the dismissal (*nolle prosequi*) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. The order explicitly states that victims and their counsel will be given the opportunity to be heard at this proceeding, citing the public's informational interest in the process.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from a case in the Southern District. A speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues against granting bail to a defendant, claiming he is a flight risk due to a lengthy, covert government investigation and his recent indictment. The judge ('THE COURT') questions the speaker about a recent submission that mentioned victims or their counsel oppose the defendant's release and asks if any of them wish to be heard.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. A prosecutor is arguing to a judge that the defendant should be detained, citing evidence of witness tampering through payments to associates, and highlighting that the defendant is an 'extraordinary flight risk' due to his immense wealth (over $500 million), six homes, two private islands, and a residence in France.
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It cites legal statutes and precedents to establish a presumption against release due to the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of a minor) and the existence of a grand jury indictment. The document also references a letter from the Government which claims Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 16, 2019, in which a government prosecutor argues for the pretrial detention of a defendant charged with sex trafficking. The prosecutor emphasizes the seriousness of the alleged crimes, which involve years of sexual abuse of dozens of minors in multiple locations. The argument is supported by claims of strong evidence, including credible and corroborated information from victims, witnesses, and a recent search of the defendant's Manhattan mansion.
This legal document, part of a court filing dated July 16, 2019, details allegations from an indictment against a defendant for sexual abuse of underage girls. The crimes allegedly occurred at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida, and involved facilitation by employees and associates. The document argues that the defendant, being 'extraordinarily wealthy' with multiple international residences and two private jets, is a significant flight risk.
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed by the government arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines his extreme wealth, lack of family ties, and extensive assets (including private jets, 15 vehicles, and a private island) as evidence that he poses a significant flight risk. It specifically details his property values in NY and FL and notes over 20 international flights taken between 2018 and 2019.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $200.00 | Payment for 'massages'/sexual acts (range $200-... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $300.00 | Payment for 'massages'/sexual acts (range $200-... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $200.00 | Payment per massage/visit as reported by Haley ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Scheduler | victims | $0.00 | Payments made after 'massages' were complete | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Mention of a 'damages provision' and 'money iss... | View |
| N/A | Received | Petitioner and Ep... | victims | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages and recruitmen... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Count Six). The government confirm... | View |
| 2021-01-26 | Received | Weinstein Co. / I... | victims | $17,000,000.00 | Settlement fund approved by judge. | View |
| 2019-10-02 | Received | FBI | victims | $0.00 | Commitment to reimburse mileage and parking, or... | View |
| 2019-07-08 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Compensation paid to alleged victims as part of... | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Received | Tierney | victims | $1,500,000.00 | Restitution and forfeiture obtained from fraudu... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Tierney | victims | $1,500,000.00 | Restitution and forfeiture in fraudulent PAC case | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Bonanno | victims | $0.00 | Scheme to steal tens of thousands of dollars fr... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Soccer Bribe Conv... | victims | $55,000,000.00 | Restitution sought by federal prosecutors | View |
| 2009-05-29 | Received | Statutory Minimum | victims | $150,000.00 | Reference to statutory minimum recovery amount ... | View |
| 2008-09-18 | Received | defendant | victims | $150,000.00 | Minimum damages set by 18 U.S.C. § 2255 referen... | View |
| 2008-08-20 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Potential compensation for victims identified u... | View |
| 2008-07-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Epstein made a concession regarding the payment... | View |
| 2008-04-01 | Received | Ed Mezvinsky | victims | $9,400,000.00 | Restitution still owed by Ed Mezvinsky. | View |
| 2008-03-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Restitution and damages (part of the proposed n... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $50,000.00 | Alternative statutory maximum argued by Epstein... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $150,000.00 | Statutory maximum damages under 18 U.S.C. § 225... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement term requiring Epstein to pay restitu... | View |
| 2007-11-28 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Civil damages under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 as part of... | View |
| 2007-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $150,000.00 | Statutory minimum damages under 18 U.S.C. § 225... | View |
Calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.
Hypothetical 'absence of phone calls' mentioned as a potential argument by the defense regarding missing phone records.
Request to submit letters and statements to the record.
Seven types of form letters: initial notification, investigation ongoing, arrest, declination, other, rights advice, investigation closed.
Calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.
Sarah Kellen's tasks included 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments'.
Villafaña interviewed victims, telling them the case was 'back under investigation' to prepare for a federal trial.
Letters informing victims that the FBI had initiated an investigation.
Letters, telephone calls, emails, numeric pager messages, or faxes regarding case events, custody status, and court hearings.
A letter was sent to victims to correct a reference to the December letter. The September letter contained information about the parties' intent in implementing 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Epstein's agreement to pay attorney fees.
FBI reports from victim interviews primarily focused on the facts of Epstein's abuse, not the status of the prosecution.
An FBI pamphlet containing CVRA rights information was provided to victims when a letter was not.
USAO and FBI letters were hand-delivered to some victims following in-person interviews to notify them of their rights.
OPR reviewed written submissions from victims concerning their contacts with the USAO and the FBI.
Notification letters issued to victims.
Standard form language stating the case was 'under investigation' and failing to inform them of the NPA.
Chat logs on myspace.com used by defense lawyers.
Court asks if Government provided notice to victims regarding the motion to unseal.
Details of massages, sexual activity, and threats.
FBI victim notification letters sent in 2006, 2007, and 2008, identifying recipients as possible victims of a federal crime.
Victims scheduled appointments with Epstein's assistants.
Notice provided to all but one victim referenced in grand jury transcripts regarding the motion to unseal.
The transcript describes Sarah Kellen's role in earlier years as 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.'
A letter was sent to victims to correct a reference to the December letter. The September letter contained information about the parties' intent in implementing 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Epstein's agreement to pay attorney fees.
Chats on myspace.com used by defense to attack victim credibility.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity