BOP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Institutional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Detainee custodian |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional separate agencies |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed defendant
|
Custodial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prosecution team
|
Separate entities |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
correctional officers
|
Employer regulator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kathleen Hawks Sawyer
|
Acting commissioner |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DOJ JMD Budget Staff
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Prosecution Team
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIG
|
Oversight audit |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
ALS
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DOJ
|
Departmental |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Governmental |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Professional strained |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Times of India
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GAO
|
Oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Contractor (Unnamed)
|
Service provider |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Custodial adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIG
|
Oversight auditing |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Custodian inmate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Mistreatment | Ms. Maxwell is allegedly being subjected to harsh prison conditions, including constant flashligh... | prison | View |
| N/A | Policy change | The BOP suspended all in-person visits, including legal visits, due to the spread of COVID-19. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A separate investigation conducted by the BOP. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An internal BOP investigation into the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s suicide. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The BOP investigated the defendant's complaints of physical abuse and concluded they were unfounded. | MDC | View |
| N/A | Detention/imprisonment | Ms. Maxwell is being held in custody under poor conditions, including being kept up at night, giv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Death in custody | Jeffrey Epstein died while under the supervision of the BOP. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Routine purging of inmate emails per BOP policy | MDC | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | BOP expects to receive updated analysis on the impact of staffing on inmate programming. | N/A | View |
| 2024-10-01 | N/A | Automated Staffing Tool (AST) went live officially. | System-wide | View |
| 2024-10-01 | N/A | Automated Staffing Tool (AST) officially went live for all FBOP professions. | Nationwide | View |
| 2024-06-01 | N/A | New monthly Security Camera Report became effective. | All facilities | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | FBOP received nationwide Direct Hire Authority (DHA) approval. | Nationwide | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | Anticipated full implementation of staffing tool covering all regions and disciplines. | All BOP Regions | View |
| 2023-06-26 | N/A | OIG Final Report released regarding Jeffrey Epstein's custody and supervision. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-01-01 | N/A | BOP released Incentives Playbook. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Contractor completed assessment and developed automated staffing tool prototype; finalized risk a... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Multiple FOIA requests filed by ABC, CNN, and MuckRack. | N/A | View |
| 2021-08-19 | Court order | Judge Nathan ordered the Government to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and respond to the defendant... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Production of Epstein materials to the Times (FOIA release) | New York | View |
| 2021-06-25 | N/A | Deadline for BOP to produce documents in Epstein FOIA | N/A | View |
| 2021-05-14 | N/A | Judge Nathan issues order regarding MDC sleep disruption and security protocols for Maxwell. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-02-02 | N/A | Judge Nathan denies BOP's request to vacate the Jan 15, 2021 Order regarding MDC Laptop Access. | Court | View |
| 2021-01-15 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding FOIA case 20-cv-833 (Times v. BOP) | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | BOP reported hiring a contractor to assist in calculating staffing levels. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001725.jpg
This legal document, dated August 17, 2020, is a filing from Ms. Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense argues for court intervention regarding Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement under the BOP and requests an order compelling the government to disclose the identities of three core alleged victims. The defense contends that withholding these identities until just before trial is prejudicial and prevents them from adequately preparing a defense for alleged conduct that occurred 25 years ago.
DOJ-OGR-00001723.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001716.jpg
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 10, 2020. The defense requests the disclosure of the identities of 'Victims 1-3' to prepare for trial and argues that Maxwell is being subjected to uniquely harsh confinement conditions at the MDC as a direct reaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in 2019. The letter details Epstein's timeline of detention and death to contextualize the extreme surveillance and isolation Maxwell is facing.
DOJ-OGR-00001709.jpg
This document is a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement at the MDC violate her Sixth Amendment rights by severely restricting her ability to review discovery materials. The defense contends that the BOP's proposed three-hour daily window for reviewing documents is insufficient given the volume of evidence and conflicts with necessary time for hygiene and exercise.
DOJ-OGR-00001697.jpg
Page 8 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The document outlines strict protocols for the Defendant's review of discovery materials, mandating supervision by Defense Counsel or BOP officials, and defines the handling of 'Highly Confidential Information,' prohibiting the dissemination of copies to potential witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00001655.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court filing (Document 29-1) from July 27, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, specifically those designated as 'Highly Confidential Information.' It details that the Defendant may only review materials in the presence of counsel or BOP officials, and sets rules for showing materials to potential defense witnesses via read-only means without providing physical copies.
DOJ-OGR-00001625.jpg
This document is page 15 of a Government memorandum filed on July 13, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The prosecution argues against granting bail, citing that the MDC is adequately handling COVID-19 risks and referencing legal precedents where bail was denied despite the pandemic. A footnote emphasizes the Government's position that the defendant has the financial means to flee the country and that pandemic travel restrictions would not prevent her flight.
DOJ-OGR-00001591.jpg
This legal document argues for the release of Ms. Maxwell from detention, citing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on her ability to prepare her defense. The filing references the 'Stephens' case as a precedent, emphasizing that the BOP's suspension of in-person visits prevents Ms. Maxwell from having the necessary meetings with her counsel for a case involving events from twenty-five years ago.
DOJ-OGR-00001439.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The text alleges severe mistreatment by prison staff, including physical abuse, withholding of food, destruction of legal documents, and excessive surveillance (including filming her showers). It also argues against flight risk allegations by citing monitored calls that demonstrate Maxwell's strong ties to the United States and desire to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00001428.jpg
In this court order from May 14, 2021, Judge Alison J. Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to override the Bureau of Prisons' security protocols regarding frequent safety checks and the prohibition of eye masks at the MDC. The Judge rules the request unsubstantiated but urges the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption and ensures Maxwell is only subjected to necessary security protocols consistent with similarly situated detainees. The order is part of Case 1:20-cr-00330.
DOJ-OGR-00001417.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell is being subjected to abusive and inhumane conditions by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The filing claims this treatment is retribution for Jeffrey Epstein's death while in BOP custody. To support the claim of agency incompetence, it quotes District Judge Colleen McMahon from a separate case criticizing the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons.
DOJ-OGR-00001413.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the government misrepresented the nature of its treatment of inmate Ms. Maxwell. The filing claims the government initially told the court that flashlight checks every 15 minutes were a routine procedure by the Bureau of Prisons, but later admitted in a letter that these checks were targeted only at Ms. Maxwell. The document asserts this special treatment is unjustified and an attempt by the government to mislead the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001352.jpg
This legal document is the second page of a letter dated January 14, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests that the court order the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to grant his client, Ms. Maxwell, laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of discovery documents for her defense. The document includes a signed order from Judge Nathan, dated January 15, 2021, granting this unopposed request.
DOJ-OGR-00001348.jpg
This document is a letter from BOP Staff Attorneys at MDC Brooklyn addressing the court regarding the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement. It details her compliance with COVID-19 protocols, meal schedules, health status, and access to legal and social communications.
DOJ-OGR-00001288.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ms. Maxwell. It details complaints about sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks, physical abuse during searches, retaliation by guards, restricted movement within her cell, poor food quality involving melted plastic, and contaminated water.
DOJ-OGR-00001287.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes government claims about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, highlighting excessive physical searches (approx. 1400 times), lack of legal access, and intense surveillance measures. Sternheim explicitly links these harsh conditions to BOP negligence surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001265.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001229.jpg
This legal document is a court ruling denying a defendant's request for release from pre-trial detention. The Court finds that the government has shown the defendant is a flight risk and rejects her argument that her conditions of confinement, including a recent COVID-19 lockdown, unconstitutionally interfere with her ability to prepare her defense. The Court concludes she has been given adequate time and resources to communicate with her attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00001139.jpg
This legal document outlines two major impediments to Ms. Maxwell's defense preparation. Firstly, it details persistent technical failures with discovery materials provided by the government, including broken and malfunctioning hard drives, which have left her without access to readable evidence for over four months. Secondly, it describes the added burdens of a 14-day COVID-19 quarantine and heightened exposure risk at the MDC due to contact with untested staff, further limiting her ability to review case materials and prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001136.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 102) dated December 14, 2020, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. It contends that her proposed $28.5 million bond package exceeds necessary requirements for ensuring her presence in court. The document features a table comparing Maxwell's proposed bail conditions (including private security and electronic monitoring) to those of other high-profile defendants like Bernie Madoff and Khashoggi, highlighting that her package is stricter than those previously granted release.
DOJ-OGR-00001110.jpg
This legal document argues for the reconsideration of Ms. Maxwell's bail application. It cites several legal precedents that allow a court to reopen bail hearings based on new evidence or changed circumstances. The primary new evidence cited is the voluminous discovery (over 2.7 million pages) produced by the government after the initial hearing, which the defense claims raises serious questions about the strength of the government's case.
DOJ-OGR-00001073.jpg
A page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney. The attorney argues that the government's citations of 'dangerousness cases' are irrelevant to Maxwell's situation and emphasizes the impossibility of preparing for trial while Maxwell is detained during the COVID-19 crisis, citing lack of in-person access to the client due to BOP restrictions. The Judge attempts to interject at the bottom of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00001070.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring defense attorney Mr. Cohen addressing the Court. Cohen requests more time to arrange sureties for a bail package, citing extreme difficulties caused by his client's (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) harsh detention conditions at the MDC. He describes these conditions as equivalent to solitary confinement, including constant lighting, isolation, lack of showers, and confiscation of legal materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000968.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Document 18, filed July 10, 2020) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense counsel argues for Maxwell's release on bail, citing the inability to effectively communicate with her due to MDC's COVID-19 protocols, which restrict in-person visits and delay phone calls. The text details a specific incident on July 6, 2020, where counsel struggled to connect with Maxwell to comply with a court order, and footnotes cite legal precedents where other defendants were released due to similar pandemic-related restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00000967.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing for the release of Ms. Maxwell, citing increased COVID-19 risks in prisons and the inability to adequately prepare a defense while detained. The text references the 'Stephens' case as a precedent where a defendant was released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) because prison lockdowns prevented necessary legal preparation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity