BOP
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Institutional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Detainee custodian |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional separate agencies |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
unnamed defendant
|
Custodial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prosecution team
|
Separate entities |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
correctional officers
|
Employer regulator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kathleen Hawks Sawyer
|
Acting commissioner |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
DOJ JMD Budget Staff
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Prosecution Team
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIG
|
Oversight audit |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
ALS
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DOJ
|
Departmental |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Governmental |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Professional strained |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Times of India
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GAO
|
Oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Contractor (Unnamed)
|
Service provider |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Custodial adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
OIG
|
Oversight auditing |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Custodian inmate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Mistreatment | Ms. Maxwell is allegedly being subjected to harsh prison conditions, including constant flashligh... | prison | View |
| N/A | Policy change | The BOP suspended all in-person visits, including legal visits, due to the spread of COVID-19. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A separate investigation conducted by the BOP. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | An internal BOP investigation into the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s suicide. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | The BOP investigated the defendant's complaints of physical abuse and concluded they were unfounded. | MDC | View |
| N/A | Detention/imprisonment | Ms. Maxwell is being held in custody under poor conditions, including being kept up at night, giv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Death in custody | Jeffrey Epstein died while under the supervision of the BOP. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Routine purging of inmate emails per BOP policy | MDC | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | BOP expects to receive updated analysis on the impact of staffing on inmate programming. | N/A | View |
| 2024-10-01 | N/A | Automated Staffing Tool (AST) went live officially. | System-wide | View |
| 2024-10-01 | N/A | Automated Staffing Tool (AST) officially went live for all FBOP professions. | Nationwide | View |
| 2024-06-01 | N/A | New monthly Security Camera Report became effective. | All facilities | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | FBOP received nationwide Direct Hire Authority (DHA) approval. | Nationwide | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | Anticipated full implementation of staffing tool covering all regions and disciplines. | All BOP Regions | View |
| 2023-06-26 | N/A | OIG Final Report released regarding Jeffrey Epstein's custody and supervision. | New York, New York | View |
| 2023-01-01 | N/A | BOP released Incentives Playbook. | N/A | View |
| 2022-01-01 | N/A | Contractor completed assessment and developed automated staffing tool prototype; finalized risk a... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Multiple FOIA requests filed by ABC, CNN, and MuckRack. | N/A | View |
| 2021-08-19 | Court order | Judge Nathan ordered the Government to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and respond to the defendant... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Production of Epstein materials to the Times (FOIA release) | New York | View |
| 2021-06-25 | N/A | Deadline for BOP to produce documents in Epstein FOIA | N/A | View |
| 2021-05-14 | N/A | Judge Nathan issues order regarding MDC sleep disruption and security protocols for Maxwell. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-02-02 | N/A | Judge Nathan denies BOP's request to vacate the Jan 15, 2021 Order regarding MDC Laptop Access. | Court | View |
| 2021-01-15 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding FOIA case 20-cv-833 (Times v. BOP) | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | BOP reported hiring a contractor to assist in calculating staffing levels. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
This document serves as a legal argument dated April 1, 2021, detailing the harsh prison conditions faced by Ghislaine Maxwell, including sleep deprivation via flashlight checks, inedible food, and undrinkable water. The defense argues that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is subjecting her to this unconstitutional treatment solely due to the public relations fallout surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. It further notes that the charges against her stem from allegations made by anonymous accusers regarding events from 1994 to 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00020685.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8-9, 2021. It details several filings, including the Government's opposition to bail reconsideration, a motion to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and letters regarding legal mail. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a conference for November 10, 2021, denying the renewed request for bail, and establishing protocols for the defendant's transport and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020671.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 28, 2023, but detailing events from August 2021. The entries describe several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including the denial of Maxwell's motion for subpoenas and instructions on sealing documents. The docket also records letters filed by both the defense, concerning interference with attorney-client communications at the MDC, and the prosecution (USA), regarding the identification of co-conspirators, along with the judge's orders for the parties to confer on these issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020666.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between May 14 and May 21, 2021. It details legal maneuvering regarding redactions to protect third parties and victims, as well as defense motions to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena and to strike surplusage from the indictment. Notably, it includes a judge's order admonishing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to ensure Maxwell's security protocols are necessary and neutral, and urging them to reduce sleep disruption.
DOJ-OGR-00020544.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (dated November 9, 2021). It contains orders from Judge Alison Nathan regarding the logistics of *voir dire* (jury selection), including the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and schedules a sealed *in camera* hearing regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence). Additionally, it logs letters from the defense regarding bond release and from the prosecution regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020543.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries on November 8 and 9, 2021. It details various pre-trial motions and orders, including the denial of a renewed bail request, the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (evidence of sexual behavior) and expert witnesses (Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus), and orders regarding the humane transport of the defendant and delivery of legal mail. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs) and the Judge, as well as filings by the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020508.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00020443.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020442.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering filings and orders on November 8 and 9, 2021. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's renewed request for bail, motions to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and the scheduling of a conference regarding Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) motions. The document also addresses logistical issues such as the delivery of legal mail to the MDC and humane transport protocols for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00020399.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 25, 2020, and October 6, 2020. It lists various filings including memorandum opinions denying defense motions, letters regarding protective orders, a notice of appeal, sealed documents, and an attorney appearance by Bobbi C. Sternheim. The entries record actions taken by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defense, and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00002341.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that allowing Maxwell to use a laptop on weekends and holidays is a necessary and reasonable accommodation for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for her trial. The letter asserts this poses no burden to the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and requests the court's existing order for access remain in effect.
DOJ-OGR-00002341(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing that her client, pretrial detainee Ms. Maxwell, should continue to be allowed laptop access on weekends and holidays. Sternheim contends this is a reasonable accommodation necessary for reviewing extensive electronic discovery for trial preparation and that it imposes no burden or security risk on the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00002338(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is the U.S. Government's response regarding a defendant's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. The U.S. Attorney's office argues that the current arrangement, where the MDC and BOP provide the defendant with 65 hours of laptop access per week plus optional weekend desktop access, is sufficient, noting that the trial is still approximately six months away.
DOJ-OGR-00002337.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government states it does not object to Maxwell's request for weekend laptop access to review discovery materials but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter emphasizes that Maxwell has already been provided with extensive access, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, for more hours than any other inmate.
DOJ-OGR-00002337(1).jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 1, 2021, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government responds to Maxwell's request for expanded laptop access to review discovery materials on weekends, stating it has no objection but ultimately defers to the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) policies. The letter details the extensive access Maxwell has already been granted, including a dedicated laptop and desktop computer, arguing she has ample opportunity to review the evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00002271.jpg
Defense attorney Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order compelling the BOP/MDC to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a laptop on weekends and holidays to review 'millions of documents' for her defense. The letter argues there are no security impediments to this request. Judge Nathan grants the unobjected-to request and orders the BOP to provide said access on January 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002269.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on January 14, 2021, by attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that there are no impediments to MDC staff providing Maxwell with a laptop on weekends and holidays and requests a court order forcing the BOP to grant this access to facilitate the review of 'millions of documents' for her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00002267.jpg
This document is a webpage printout from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), dated January 4, 2021, and filed in a legal case. It outlines the BOP's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically its policy of reviewing inmates for home confinement based on risk factors defined by the CDC. This policy was implemented following a directive from Attorney General Barr on March 26, 2020, which led to a significant increase in inmates being placed on home confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00002252.jpg
This document is page 20 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's request for release, reaffirming that she presents a flight risk and determining that her conditions of confinement at the MDC (including COVID-19 lockdowns) do not violate her constitutional rights or justify release. The text notes that the Defendant has received more time than other inmates to review discovery and communicate with counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00002252(1).jpg
This is page 20 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (identified by case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the defendant's request for release, reaffirming that she presents a flight risk and rejecting arguments that her conditions of confinement at the MDC (specifically relating to COVID-19 lockdowns and attorney access) violate her constitutional rights. The document notes that she has received significant time to review discovery compared to other inmates.
DOJ-OGR-00002015.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) outlines the defense's grievances regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's inability to access readable discovery materials due to technical failures with hard drives provided by the government. It also details harsh prison conditions at the MDC, specifically noting that Maxwell was placed in quarantine after exposure to a COVID-positive staffer and subjected to invasive searches that increased her health risks.
DOJ-OGR-00002014.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues that her pretrial detention conditions at the MDC are excessively punitive and inappropriate. Her counsel asserts these conditions—including de facto solitary confinement and constant surveillance—are an overreaction to Epstein's death, are disproportionate for a non-violent detainee, and are impeding her ability to prepare a defense. The document references multiple unsuccessful attempts by counsel to remedy the situation through communication with the MDC, its legal department, and prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00002012.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, argues for the approval of a proposed $28.5 million bail package for defendant Ms. Maxwell. It contends that this package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court by comparing it to the less restrictive bail conditions of other high-profile defendants with significant financial means and foreign citizenships. A table is provided to illustrate these precedents, detailing bond amounts and conditions for defendants such as Madoff, Khashoggi, and others.
DOJ-OGR-00001996.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell should be granted bail. It contends she was not hiding from the government but was protecting herself and her family from intense media scrutiny and physical threats that escalated dramatically after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019. The filing asserts her financial transparency, citing joint tax returns and financial reports, and uses media analytics from LexisNexis to demonstrate the spike in press coverage as evidence for her need for privacy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity