Sigrid McCawley
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Boies
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ellen Brockman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Claimant (Redacted)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
EMMA ROSEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Meredith Schultz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Professional alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joshua Schiller
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] witness
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[REDACTED WITNESS]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Peter Skinner
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
James E. Hill
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Witness
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1000
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of letter regarding unsealing of Grand Jury Transcripts | New York, NY (SDNY) | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Legal filing | A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-26 | N/A | Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Arraignment Conference | Court (Physical and Phone) | View |
| 2020-12-15 | N/A | Coordination of legal filing | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-10-29 | N/A | Planned meeting regarding DOJ invites/Epstein victims. | Unknown (Sigrid plans to at... | View |
| 2020-10-03 | Legal event | A claimant executed a General Release. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-17 | N/A | Conversation between the redacted sender and Attorney Sigrid McCawley regarding the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed and signed by counsel for both pa... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-09 | N/A | Scheduled conference call/interview | Phone (Witness in Texas, At... | View |
| 2020-03-26 | N/A | Email discussion regarding a Daily Beast article about a lawsuit filed against the Epstein estate... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2020-03-18 | N/A | Sigrid McCawley receives information about Ghislaine Maxwell's indemnification action in USVI. | View | |
| 2020-03-18 | N/A | Sigrid McCawley receives and forwards information regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's USVI indemnificat... | View | |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Meeting between Sigrid McCawley, her client (Ms. [Redacted]), and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. | New York (SDNY Building imp... | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Interview/Meeting regarding Epstein investigation | 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New Yo... | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Phone conversation between Sigrid McCawley and SDNY prosecutors | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed meeting between SDNY and Ms. [Redacted] | New York | View |
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00029499.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
EFTA00029458.pdf
This document consists of an exchange of letters between Paul G. Cassell of the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law and an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard (Metropolitan Police). In the first letter (July 31, 2015), Cassell follows up on previous correspondence regarding allegations of international sex trafficking against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, offering his client's assistance in the investigation. In the response (August 10, 2015), the Metropolitan Police confirm they are progressing with the matter and request formal written confirmation that Cassell is legally authorized to represent the specific client involved.
EFTA00029457.pdf
A letter dated July 31, 2015, from Paul G. Cassell (University of Utah College of Law) to an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard. Cassell is following up on a previous correspondence from May 2015 regarding an investigation into international sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. He reiterates his client's (name redacted) offer to assist with the investigation.
EFTA00029100.pdf
This legal filing is a Reply Memorandum by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, arguing for the suppression of evidence and dismissal of charges based on government misconduct. The defense asserts that prosecutors misled Chief Judge McMahon about the extent of their prior coordination with civil attorneys (Boies Schiller Flexner) to obtain a grand jury subpoena, thereby circumventing a civil protective order. The document details a specific meeting on February 29, 2016, where civil attorneys 'pitched' the prosecution of Maxwell and provided documents, including flight records (though the specific flight data is not listed in this text), which the prosecution later failed to disclose to the judge.
EFTA00028929.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.
EFTA00027942.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 23-24, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorney Sigrid McCawley regarding travel arrangements for a witness/victim traveling from Australia to New York (likely for the Epstein victim hearing). The government explains they must book travel to pay for it, but McCawley had already booked the inbound flight and hotel due to safety concerns. The correspondence discusses the government covering the return flight, which is estimated at over $10,000 because the witness requested business class due to a medical condition.
EFTA00027912.pdf
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
EFTA00027881.pdf
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00027824.pdf
This document is an email thread from March 2020 discussing a Daily Beast article titled 'Is One of Jeffrey Epstein's Co-Conspirators Suing His Estate?'. The correspondents discuss a quote by Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, who condemns a lawsuit filed by a 'Doe' plaintiff, alleging the plaintiff is actually a co-conspirator who profited from Epstein's abuse.
EFTA00027394.pdf
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to attorneys Sigrid McCawley and 'David'. The email serves to notify them of an order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that it applies to attorneys associated with cases, including those representing witnesses.
EFTA00027162.pdf
An email chain from April 21, 2021, between attorneys Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner), Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger regarding compliance with an order from Judge Nathan. McCawley requests confirmation to send specific documents and redactions related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case to the Government. Pagliuca forwards the relevant PDF attachments, noting they were missing from a previous email.
EFTA00027158.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney to Judge Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email updates the court on victim attendance for an upcoming arraignment, noting that Victim-2 will attend via phone while her attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley will attend in person, whereas Victims 1, 3, and 4 will not attend.
EFTA00026965.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY. The correspondence concerns the submission of evidence from a witness represented by McCawley, specifically photographs and journal entries from 1995 and 1996. The witness's journal entries detail a trip to New York, visiting Jeffrey Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
EFTA00026800.pdf
This document contains an email chain from February 2020 between Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein investigation.' The correspondence coordinates a meeting scheduled for March 4, 2020, in New York between the prosecutors, McCawley, and a female client/witness (name redacted). One participant notes they will miss the meeting due to a conflict in White Plains.
EFTA00026783.pdf
This document is an email dated February 24, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Sigrid McCawley. The prosecutor is following up on a phone call to schedule an in-person meeting in New York with McCawley and her client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted],' regarding the Epstein investigation.
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
EFTA00025501.pdf
This document is an email thread between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, spanning January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of 1995-1996 journal entries and photographs, and schedules a second interview with the witness. The prosecution explicitly states they have 'no doubts whatsoever' about the witness's candor and truthfulness.
EFTA00025468.pdf
An email thread from April 24, 2020, in which attorney Sigrid McCawley sends documents (attached as a ZIP file labeled RFP_RFA_ROG) to a redacted recipient. McCawley notes that her staff is reviewing the materials to ensure completeness and mentions that she is working to provide access to videos later that morning.
EFTA00025398.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2020 between the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). OPR is seeking to interview 32 individuals regarding their historical contacts (2005-2008) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) and FBI Miami concerning the Epstein case. SDNY agrees to the interviews but requests that OPR avoid discussing the substance of the underlying criminal scheme or interactions with Epstein to avoid interfering with SDNY's active investigation, noting that any relevant statements must be handled as '3500 material' (Jencks Act). The correspondence lists the legal representation for the 32 individuals, noting the majority are represented by Brad Edwards.
EFTA00025329.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Sigrid McCawley and the SDNY (specifically an Assistant US Attorney, possibly named Boxer) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, a visit to Epstein's house, and a movie outing with him. The SDNY expresses confidence in the witness's truthfulness and requests a follow-up interview to review her experiences again.
EFTA00025324.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors also request a follow-up interview with the witness, noting they found her previous testimony credible.
EFTA00025319.pdf
This document contains a series of emails between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of specific journal entries from 1995 and 1996, which detail the witness's trips to New York, visits to Epstein's house, and social outings with him. The prosecutors explicitly state they have no doubts about the witness's candor and request a follow-up interview.
EFTA00025305.pdf
This document is a series of email chains between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness cooperating in the Epstein/Maxwell investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of the witness's journal entries from 1995-1996 and schedules a follow-up interview. The journals confirm the witness visited Epstein's NY house in January 1996 and went to the movies with him.
EFTA00025295.pdf
This document is an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and a redacted Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of evidence, specifically journal entries from 1995-1996 and photographs involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails confirm the witness's historical contact with Epstein, including visits to his NY house and going to the movies, and arrange for a follow-up interview with prosecutors.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Providing journal pages and context about fading colored pencil entries.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Confirming receipt of information.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Providing journal pages and explanation. Notes entries from 12/95, 01/07/1996 (NY trip/Epstein's house), and 01/25/1996 (movies).
[Redacted] follow-up request
Initial request for journal entries mentioned during a previous interview. Notes receipt of photographs.
follow-up request
Requesting review of journal entries mentioned by witness during previous interview that refreshed her recollection of Epstein and Maxwell.
[REDACTED] follow-up request
Initial request for journal entries mentioned by witness in a previous interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell.
[Redacted] follow-up request
Initial request for journal entries to refresh recollection of events involving Epstein and Maxwell.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Acknowledging receipt of photos; requesting journal entries.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Initial request for journal entries and documents following a previous interview.
[Redacted] follow-up request
Initial request to review journal entries mentioned by the witness during a previous interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Confirming she will ask the witness about the journal; mentions witness shared pictures from time with Epstein/Maxwell.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Acknowledging receipt of photos and confirming interest in journal entries.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Confirming she will ask the witness about the journal ASAP.
[Redacted] follow-up request
Initial follow-up request after an interview a few months prior, specifically asking for journal entries mentioned by the witness that refresh her recollection of events with Epstein/Maxwell.
RE: [Redacted] follow-up request
Acknowledging receipt of photos; requesting journal entries.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Update on victim visa issues; one victim decided not to travel but willing to do video conference.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Confirming holding slot; agreeing to video conference for one victim; asking for dates/times.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Discussing logistics for a victim driving in; proposing partner accompany her.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Detailed breakdown of potential victim interviews, including specific mentions of Epstein bringing a victim to the US.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Confirming 2pm-4pm slot on 10/22; noting schedule tightness for other slots.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Acknowledging scheduling difficulties; willing to reshuffle.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Proposing interview times for multiple victims. Discussing logistics, visa issues for one victim, and Skype attendance for another.
RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Confirming meeting with one victim on 10/22 at 2pm; noting schedule conflicts for other proposed times.
Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Initial outreach regarding victims being in NY on 10/22 and 10/23 for interviews.
Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23
Inquiring about availability of McCawley's clients for interviews while in NY.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity