| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David Boies
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ellen Brockman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Claimant (Redacted)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia L. Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
EMMA ROSEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Meredith Schultz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Professional alliance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joshua Schiller
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] witness
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. [Redacted]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[REDACTED WITNESS]
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Victim-2
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Peter Skinner
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
James E. Hill
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Witness
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1000
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of letter regarding unsealing of Grand Jury Transcripts | New York, NY (SDNY) | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Legal filing | A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-26 | N/A | Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Arraignment Conference | Court (Physical and Phone) | View |
| 2020-12-15 | N/A | Coordination of legal filing | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-10-29 | N/A | Planned meeting regarding DOJ invites/Epstein victims. | Unknown (Sigrid plans to at... | View |
| 2020-10-03 | Legal event | A claimant executed a General Release. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-17 | N/A | Conversation between the redacted sender and Attorney Sigrid McCawley regarding the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed and signed by counsel for both pa... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-09 | N/A | Scheduled conference call/interview | Phone (Witness in Texas, At... | View |
| 2020-03-26 | N/A | Email discussion regarding a Daily Beast article about a lawsuit filed against the Epstein estate... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2020-03-18 | N/A | Sigrid McCawley receives information about Ghislaine Maxwell's indemnification action in USVI. | View | |
| 2020-03-18 | N/A | Sigrid McCawley receives and forwards information regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's USVI indemnificat... | View | |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Meeting between Sigrid McCawley, her client (Ms. [Redacted]), and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. | New York (SDNY Building imp... | View |
| 2020-03-04 | N/A | Interview/Meeting regarding Epstein investigation | 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New Yo... | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Phone conversation between Sigrid McCawley and SDNY prosecutors | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-24 | N/A | Proposed meeting between SDNY and Ms. [Redacted] | New York | View |
This document is an email chain from February and March 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are scheduling an in-person interview/meeting for McCawley's client, referred to as 'Ms. [Redacted]', to take place on March 4, 2020, at the SDNY offices at 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New York. The subject line references the 'Epstein investigation'.
This document is an email chain from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) coordinating interviews for several Epstein victims. The correspondence discusses scheduling around a 'victims' meeting' on October 23, 2019, and visa/passport issues for a specific victim who was 'brought to the US by Epstein a number of times.' The emails also mention a set of sisters, one of whom had already been interviewed by the SDNY.
An email chain from March 2020 involving attorney Sigrid McCawley discussing a new indemnification action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the USVI. McCawley notes that the filing contradicts Maxwell's previous sworn depositions regarding financial assistance from Jeffrey Epstein and reveals previously unproduced correspondence and employment history. The information originated from James E. Hill, likely an ABC reporter, as ABC was preparing a story on the matter.
This document is a civil complaint filed on November 14, 2019, by Jane Doe 1000 against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The plaintiff alleges she was recruited in late 1999 under the guise of modeling opportunities for Victoria's Secret, then subjected to years of sexual abuse, manipulation, and trafficking by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in New York and Palm Beach. The complaint details Epstein's wealth, his specific properties in NY and NM, his 2008 plea deal, his 2019 arrest and death, and specific instances of abuse involving Maxwell.
This document contains email metadata from December 3, 2020. The email was sent to attorney Sigrid McCawley with the subject 'bail application' and included an embedded message file of the same name. The sender and other recipients are redacted, though 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' appears in the Bcc field.
This document is an email chain between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The emails discuss scheduling a follow-up interview in May 2020 for a witness located in Texas who has a 'patient schedule'. The chain also includes correspondence from January 2020 where the SDNY requests, and McCawley provides, specific journal entries from the witness dating back to late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, visiting Epstein's house, and going to the movies with him.
This document is an email thread from July 30, 2020, initiated by an automated PacerPro notification regarding a 'Motion to Stay' filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-02413). Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwarded this notification to colleagues (including Peter Skinner), stating that she would respond to the motion by the following day.
Email correspondence from October 2019 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney for the SDNY coordinating interviews with victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The emails discuss scheduling interviews for multiple victims around a 'victims' meeting' in New York on October 22-23. One victim requires visa clearance and was noted as having been brought to the US by Epstein multiple times; another victim is identified as the sister of a previously interviewed individual.
An email chain from October 13, 2019, initiated by attorney Matthew L. Schwartz requesting a discussion about an 'Epstein-related forfeiture question.' The recipients discuss internally who Schwartz represents, noting his firm's connection to Florida-based partner Sigrid McCawley and debating whether to direct him to the 'case team.'
This document is an email chain from February 5, 2020, involving attorney Sigrid McCawley. McCawley highlights a filing by the Epstein Estate in the US Virgin Islands, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers (Haddon Morgan) submitted a $621,000 bill to the estate. McCawley points out that this contradicts Maxwell's previous testimony claiming Epstein did not pay for her litigation.
This document is an email thread from April 2019 involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP regarding a Grand Jury Subpoena. The correspondence discusses a sealed order from the Southern District of New York granting BSF permission to produce confidential discovery materials from the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (likely Giuffre v. Maxwell) in response to the subpoena. It explicitly notes that the order does not apply to other litigation such as 'In re Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein'.
This document is an email chain from April 15, 2019, between Peter Skinner (likely representing Boies Schiller Flexner) and a redacted sender (likely a federal prosecutor). The correspondence concerns a Grand Jury subpoena served on BSF regarding the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' civil case. The redacted sender provides a sealed order granting BSF permission to turn over 'CONFIDENTIAL' discovery materials to the Grand Jury, while explicitly noting this order does not apply to the 'Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein' litigation.
An email dated March 22, 2019, from attorney Sigrid McCawley to a redacted recipient. McCawley attaches a 2016 subpoena notice regarding 'Shopper's Travel' and informs the recipient that the travel agency previously resisted legal requests and provided no documentation.
This document is an email chain dated July 30, 2020, in which Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwards a PacerPro notification to a redacted recipient and Peter Skinner. The notification concerns a 'Motion to Stay' filed that day on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (Case 20-02413). McCawley indicates she intends to respond to the motion by the following day.
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
This document is a civil complaint filed on September 21, 2015, in the Southern District of New York by a redacted Plaintiff (identifiable by context as Virginia Giuffre) against Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaint alleges defamation arising from Maxwell's public statements in January 2015, where she called the Plaintiff a liar regarding allegations of sex trafficking and sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein. The document details the history of the alleged abuse (1999-2002), the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and Maxwell's specific efforts to discredit the Plaintiff's reputation.
This document contains a 2019 email chain from Boies Schiller Flexner discussing Jeffrey Epstein's use of pseudo email accounts to communicate. Attached are historical emails from September 2005 demonstrating Epstein's use of these accounts (likely ending in @gmail.com and @ellmax.com). The attachments show Ed Razek (L Brands) forwarding an investment opportunity from William Mook to Epstein, and Mike O'Neil inviting Epstein to a Trilateral Commission meeting in Montreal. The document also includes text from a Bloomberg article detailing Epstein's connections to Les Wexner, Victoria's Secret models, and his use of Wexner's Boeing 727.
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
This document is an email from attorney Sigrid McCawley dated March 18, 2020, discussing an indemnification action filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the USVI. McCawley notes that the filing contains statements contradicting Maxwell's previous sworn depositions regarding financial support from Jeffrey Epstein and lists companies she was employed by which were not previously disclosed. The email mentions that ABC is preparing a news story on the matter.
This document is an email chain from April 21, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence details the attendance plans for victims and their counsel at an upcoming arraignment, specifically noting that Victim-2 will attend by phone while her attorneys, David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, will attend in person. It also confirms that four attorneys will appear on behalf of the Government.
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (likely Maureen Comey) regarding the filing of a victim impact statement. The chain includes the full text of the statement from an unnamed victim opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail, describing Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who groomed and abused the victim as a child and procured victims for Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence coordinates the formatting and timing of filing this statement as an exhibit to the government's opposition to bail.
A legal letter dated August 6, 2025, from attorney Robert S. Glassman to the SDNY Victim and Witness Coordinator regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. Glassman, representing a 'Jane Doe' victim, joins a previous letter submitted by Annie Farmer's attorney and strongly opposes the release of any information that identifies victims, requesting redactions if materials are released.
This is a legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from attorney Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to U.S. District Judges Berman and Engelmayer. The letter is written on behalf of victim Annie Farmer regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter heavily criticizes the Department of Justice for failing to pursue further criminal investigations and notes that Maxwell is attempting to negotiate a pardon.
This document is an appearances page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 9, 2021. It lists the names, roles, and affiliations of the attorneys and a paralegal representing the Plaintiff, and the attorneys representing the Defendant. A videographer is also noted as being present for the proceedings.
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is page 4 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues that public statements made by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys for witnesses (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Bradley Edwards) are prejudicial against Ghislaine Maxwell and violate local court rules. The document quotes these individuals characterizing Maxwell as a villain, speculating on her cooperation, and defining her role as the primary facilitator for Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
Attorney Sigrid McCawley stated that the pain Maxwell caused will never go away.
Response regarding the unsealing of transcripts and criticism of the government's handling of the investigation.
Discussing Judge Nathan's order to confer with the Government about redactions and seeking confirmation to send materials.
Asking if the filing date is today or tomorrow.
Suggesting a letter addressed to Judge Nathan is the best format.
Requesting the statement be in a separate PDF with attribution, noting it will be filed as an exhibit to the memorandum of law in opposition to the bail motion.
Suggesting a letter addressed to Judge Nathan might be the most natural format.
Metadata indicates an embedded message 'RE:_Filing.msg'. Message-ID associated with bsfllp.com.
Confirming filing is due tomorrow, aiming for 5pm ET.
Asking if the filing date is today or tomorrow.
Confirming receipt of the statement to be filed as an exhibit to the memorandum of law in opposition to the bail motion.
Submitting the draft statement from a victim regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail motion.
Submitting a statement from a victim regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application.
Email metadata showing forwarding or transmission of a 'bail application' message. Includes an embedded file 'bail_application.msg'.
Attempting to schedule a call for three people to chat.
Informing Sigrid that DOJ received an RSVP from a person not on the original client list.
Asking for a phone number to reach the sender.
Listing locations of clients who want to participate but cannot travel (NY, NJ, Texas, Spain, South Africa, Australia).
Asking for locations of clients who cannot travel to discuss alternative participation methods with DOJ.
Asking if an overseas client can participate via Zoom.
Informing that due to the nature of the discussion, there will not be a Zoom option, but info will be sent after.
Confirming attendance of sender and another redacted individual.
Confirming the meeting is about the 2006 investigation.
Confirming plan to be present at the meeting in person.
Asking if the meeting is intended to go over what occurred during the earlier 2006 investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity