DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014962.jpg
This is page 86 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely a clinical expert), who is testifying about the importance of asking patients about their disclosure history regarding child sexual abuse. The witness explains that delayed disclosure often correlates with a lack of immediate medical care and that the response a victim receives upon disclosure significantly impacts outcomes.
DOJ-OGR-00014957.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert psychologist), explaining that studies show adolescents (ages 12-18) are statistically much more likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood compared to other age groups. The witness attributes this to developmental stages where adolescents prefer confiding in peers rather than adults and desire to view themselves as competent.
DOJ-OGR-00014956.jpg
This document is page 80 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of an expert witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the psychological reasons abuse victims may not report crimes immediately, including shame, affection for the abuser, and fear of consequences. The witness defines the concept of 'delayed disclosure' specifically regarding sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00014955.jpg
This document is page 79 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio defines grooming as a pattern of coercive control and testifies that a relationship of trust between a victim and perpetrator causes the victim confusion regarding what constitutes abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014954.jpg
This document is page 78 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio, likely an expert on sexual abuse dynamics. The dialogue focuses on comparing 'grooming' strategies used by pimps to procure victims for third parties versus grooming for direct abuse, with the witness confirming that the coercive behaviors and techniques remain the same regardless of who receives the sexual gratification.
DOJ-OGR-00014951.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The discussion focuses on whether the presence of a single other individual helps create trustworthiness that facilitates abuse. The witness states that while specific literature on a 'single other adult' in child sexual abuse is scarce, pimping and trafficking literature supports group activity, and their own forensic experience confirms that offenders frequently surround themselves with others to facilitate abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014948.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features a dialogue between the Court and a witness (Rocchio) regarding the forensic analysis of grooming. The witness explains that while prior sexual abuse increases vulnerability to subsequent abuse, that history alone does not determine whether grooming occurred in a specific instance.
DOJ-OGR-00014947.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding filed on January 15, 2025, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the psychological definitions of 'grooming' versus 'consensual sexual activity,' with the witness clarifying that prior victimization increases the likelihood of subsequent victimization and risky sexual behavior in adolescents, rather than consensual activity leading to grooming susceptibility. The Judge (The Court) intervenes to clarify the distinction regarding susceptibility to grooming tactics.
DOJ-OGR-00014944.jpg
This document is page 68 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on expert analysis of 'Victim Selection' and the 'grooming process,' discussing scientific literature and professional agreement regarding behaviors used by offenders to build trust and attachment.
DOJ-OGR-00014940.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of an expert witness named Rocchio. The witness discusses clinical psychology concepts regarding sexual abuse, specifically the 'revictimization literature' and how family vulnerabilities (such as a sick parent or lack of attention) allow perpetrators to 'befriend the family' to gain access to victims. The document is stamped with a filing date of January 15, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00014939.jpg
This document is page 63 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, likely an expert in psychology or forensics. Rocchio testifies about clinical training regarding 'vulnerability factors' and groups at higher risk for child sexual abuse, specifically mentioning that women and girls are a higher-risk demographic.
DOJ-OGR-00014934.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The government moves to admit 'Government Exhibit 5,' an article written by Park Dietz, which is accepted without objection. Dr. Rocchio explains that he provided this article to the government to clarify the concepts of 'grooming' and 'seduction' as established patterns in sexual abuse dynamics, noting specifically how older literature often used terminology that victim-blamed.
DOJ-OGR-00014930.jpg
This page contains a transcript of the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Dr. Rocchio provides expert testimony refuting an older article's conclusion that there is no consensus on 'grooming,' arguing that while universal agreement on every detail is rare in social science, there is definite scientific consensus on the phenomena of grooming and child sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014923.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio testifies about the psychological concepts of 'trauma bonding,' 'coercion,' and 'grooming' in the context of sex trafficking and pimp/sex worker relationships. The prosecution also introduces Government Exhibit 3, an academic article validating a model of child sexual abusers, authored by Georgia Winters, Elizabeth Jeglic, and Leah Kaylor.
DOJ-OGR-00014922.jpg
This document is page 46 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio, is testifying about an academic study regarding 'coercive control' and victimization tactics. The Judge interrupts to ask specifically about the comparison between 'trauma bonding' and the relationship between a pimp and a sex worker.
DOJ-OGR-00014920.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct testimony of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, discussing methods of substantiating abuse cases, including legal convictions and medical evidence (specifically gonorrhea in children). During the testimony, the government introduces 'Government Exhibit 2,' an article regarding 'coercive control' authored by Jacquelynn Duron, Laura Johnson, Gretchen Hoge, and Judy Postmus, which is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
DOJ-OGR-00014916.jpg
This is page 40 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio (likely Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is under direct examination discussing the differences between clinical and forensic psychology roles, specifically noting that in a clinical setting, she does not verify the truth of a victim's report via external evidence like newspaper articles. She testifies that there is 'remarkable consistency' regarding grooming tactics across her clinical work, forensic work, and scientific literature.
DOJ-OGR-00014915.jpg
This document is page 39 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, a forensic expert, who explains that forensic evaluations do not automatically assume a victim's report is true. Dr. Rocchio details the methodology used to objectively assess claims, including reviewing literature, administering psychological tests, and cross-referencing third-party information to identify consistencies or inconsistencies regarding alleged sexual abuse and grooming.
DOJ-OGR-00014914.jpg
This is page 38 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, Rocchio, is testifying on direct examination about their professional methodology for forensic evaluations, which includes reviewing police and medical records, conducting 8-10 hours of face-to-face evaluation, and collateral interviews. The witness specifically confirms experience evaluating issues of 'grooming' in civil cases involving allegations of childhood sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014907.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 01/15/25) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Rocchio. The witness defines 'grooming the environment' as a tactic where sexual offenders manipulate a child's parents or community institutions (citing the Boy Scouts as an example) to gain trust, respectability, and access to victims. The testimony outlines the psychological strategies used to disarm guardians and normalize the offender's presence.
DOJ-OGR-00014906.jpg
Page 30 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. Witness Rocchio provides expert testimony defining 'grooming' as a series of tactics used by offenders to deceive children, build trust, and eventually abuse them. The testimony details strategies such as gaining access via organizations (e.g., schools, scouts), isolating victims, and using 'courtship' behaviors like gift-giving and affection to manipulate the child.
DOJ-OGR-00014905.jpg
This document is page 29 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Jan 15, 2025) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio establishes their credentials as an expert in psychology, specifically regarding traumatic stress and complex trauma. The testimony focuses on the nature of childhood sexual abuse, with the expert stating that most instances occur without physical force (using coercion/control) and are committed by people known to the child.
DOJ-OGR-00014903.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who provides testimony regarding their professional training in trauma, childhood abuse, and forensic psychology. Rocchio also details their experience training others, including serving on ethics committees for psychological associations and supervising fellows at Brown University Medical School.
DOJ-OGR-00014900.jpg
Page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, identified in the header as Rocchio, is undergoing direct examination regarding their professional qualifications in the field of psychology. Rocchio testifies to holding leadership positions with the American Psychological Association (Division of Trauma Psychology and Ethics Committee) and the Rhode Island Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00014891.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Rocchio (Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is testifying on direct examination about her professional background. She distinguishes her clinical practice, which focuses on treatment and therapy, from her forensic practice, which involves investigative roles, expert testimony, and objective evaluations in civil and criminal cases involving traumatic stress.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity