| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
20
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
14
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Sloman
|
Professional subordinate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political appointee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
President Trump
|
Political nominee nominator |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Starr
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Matthew Menchel
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political appointment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey H. Sloman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Cabinet member |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ken Starr
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Sloman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Sloman
|
Professional subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lawmakers (Sasse, Rubio, Murray, etc.)
|
Investigatory |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of prosecution prosecutor |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth W. Starr
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional supervisory |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Sloman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Professional political |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional federal vs state prosecutor |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sentenced to 18 months, served 13 months. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A lawsuit was filed over how federal prosecutors handled the accusations against Jeffrey Epstein. | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta interview with Trump transition team where he explained the Epstein deal. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alexander Acosta was nominated by President Trump to be the secretary of labor. | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Revival of prosecution commenced in SDFL against Epstein resulting in NPA | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta began discussing possible employment with Kirkland & Ellis and recused himself. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alexander Acosta, as a federal prosecutor, cut a deal with Jeffrey Epstein regarding accusations ... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of the investigation requested by U.S. Attorney Acosta. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Investigation Conclusion | DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta helps Epstein avoid life in prison | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea deal / Non-prosecution agreement finalized. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Defense Counsel. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Meeting between Alexander Acosta and Jay Lefkowitz to finalize the Epstein non-prosecution agreem... | West Palm Beach Marriott on... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched a probe into professional misconduct by Acosta and Villafaña. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-19 | N/A | Alexander Acosta resigned as U.S. Secretary of Labor due to criticism of the Epstein case. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Acosta resigns as Secretary of Labor. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-10 | N/A | Alexander Acosta publicly defends his role in the Epstein prosecution. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | Judge Marra rules that federal prosecutors broke the law in the Epstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2019-02-15 | N/A | Publication of Miami Herald article regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending Alexander Acosta. | Miami/Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-02-04 | N/A | Approximate date ('Last week') it was revealed OPR opened investigation into Acosta. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-02-01 | N/A | Court ruled in favor of victims, stating prosecutors violated CVRA. | Florida federal court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors broke the law regarding the E... | South Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra granted summary judgment to victims, ruling prosecutors violated the CVRA. | U.S. District Court | View |
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news report (likely the Miami Herald given the authors) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details a December 2007 letter from Alexander Acosta to Kenneth Starr, in which Acosta complains that Epstein is in violation of a September plea agreement and criticizes the defense team's stalling tactics. The page features a collage of photos including Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz, and others, though only the text is analyzed here.
This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details the 2011 fallout where victim Roberts publicly accused Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. It describes Alexander Acosta's defense of his decision not to prosecute Epstein federally, citing a 'year-long assault' by Epstein's legal team. However, the report notes that documents show prosecutors capitulated to the defense team's demands, abandoning a prepared 53-page indictment from 2007.
This document appears to be a page from a 2018 news article (likely the Miami Herald) included in a House Oversight Committee file. It details the legal maneuvering by Epstein's high-profile legal team to avoid prison time for him and highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Detective Joseph Recarey to investigate Epstein despite the risks to their careers. The text describes the influx of underage girls to Epstein's Palm Beach compound and the wealthy environment of the island.
This document appears to be a page from a report or news article (likely the Miami Herald's investigation) included in House Oversight records. It highlights Alexander Acosta's personal involvement in legal negotiations as the U.S. Attorney in Miami, noting his subsequent position in the Trump Cabinet and consideration for Attorney General. It also references the Miami Herald's analysis of records identifying over 80 victims.
This newspaper article from December 8, 2018, reports that over two dozen U.S. lawmakers are demanding an investigation into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role as a former federal prosecutor in brokering a lenient 2008 plea deal for multimillionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The call for a probe, spurred by a Miami Herald investigation, highlights how the deal granted Epstein immunity, hid the proceedings from his underage victims, and allowed him to serve only 13 months in jail.
This document is a snippet from a news article by Marc Fisher, identified by the label 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022399'. The article discusses a lawsuit concerning a deal that federal prosecutors, including then-Labor Secretary nominee Alexander Acosta, made with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sex with minors. It also notes that President Trump was a witness in this lawsuit.
Discussions regarding Acosta's employment with the firm.
Included in submission materials.
Proposal to resolve disagreements over interpretation of the NPA relating to victim restitution/rights.
Proposed modification to the DPA which the defense claims was never agreed to.
Letter referenced by Lefkowitz in his response regarding victim notification and FBI involvement.
Informed defense that USAO would defer to State Attorney's discretion regarding notifying victims about Epstein's state plea hearing.
Acosta expresses frustration with delay tactics and collateral challenges, expecting a decision to reaffirm or unwind the agreement by Dec 7, 2007.
Acosta complained that Epstein was in violation of the September agreement and that the defense team was using tactics to challenge resolutions collaterally.
Acosta complained that Epstein was in violation of the September agreement and that the defense team was using tactics to challenge resolutions collaterally.
Acosta complained that Epstein was in violation of the September agreement and that the defense team was using tactics to challenge resolutions collaterally.
Asserted Epstein is entitled to any sentence available including work release as long as it doesn't violate NPA.
Meeting between US Attorney and Defense Counsel.
Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz.
Acosta communicated with Sloman about his conversation with Lefkowitz.
A meeting cited in the investigation; OPR determined it did not lead to the NPA (which was signed earlier) or benefit Epstein significantly.
Reiterated the 'misunderstanding' argument regarding the Sept 12 meeting and requested non-registrable plea
Discussed need for Epstein to plead to a registrable offense
Discussion following Sanchez emails
According to Villafaña, Acosta called to say registration was non-negotiable. (Note: Krischer did not recall this interaction).
Acosta stating he doesn't typically sign plea agreements and that the trial team should only go forward if they support and sign it.
Asked to stick to deadline; opined it was extreme to allow defense to argue to different agencies.
Informed Acosta that Oosterbaan could join via phone. Requested guidance on interviewing NY assistants while negotiating plea.
Direct discussions regarding plea agreement.
Meeting discussed in OPR report; OPR found no evidence it led to significant decisions benefiting Epstein.
Addressed concerns about Epstein delaying the plea; asserted disagreements were the cause of delay.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity