| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
20
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
14
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Jay Lefkowitz
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Sloman
|
Professional subordinate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political appointee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
President Trump
|
Political nominee nominator |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth Starr
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Marie Villafaña
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Matthew Menchel
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political appointment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey H. Sloman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Cabinet member |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ken Starr
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Sloman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Sloman
|
Professional subordinate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lawmakers (Sasse, Rubio, Murray, etc.)
|
Investigatory |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of prosecution prosecutor |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Political professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth W. Starr
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional supervisory |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Marie Villafaña
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Sloman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Professional political |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Professional federal vs state prosecutor |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sentenced to 18 months, served 13 months. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A lawsuit was filed over how federal prosecutors handled the accusations against Jeffrey Epstein. | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta interview with Trump transition team where he explained the Epstein deal. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alexander Acosta was nominated by President Trump to be the secretary of labor. | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Revival of prosecution commenced in SDFL against Epstein resulting in NPA | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta began discussing possible employment with Kirkland & Ellis and recused himself. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alexander Acosta, as a federal prosecutor, cut a deal with Jeffrey Epstein regarding accusations ... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of the investigation requested by U.S. Attorney Acosta. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Investigation Conclusion | DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta helps Epstein avoid life in prison | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Plea deal / Non-prosecution agreement finalized. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Breakfast meeting between Acosta and Defense Counsel. | Unknown | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Meeting between Alexander Acosta and Jay Lefkowitz to finalize the Epstein non-prosecution agreem... | West Palm Beach Marriott on... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched a probe into professional misconduct by Acosta and Villafaña. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-19 | N/A | Alexander Acosta resigned as U.S. Secretary of Labor due to criticism of the Epstein case. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Acosta resigns as Secretary of Labor. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-07-10 | N/A | Alexander Acosta publicly defends his role in the Epstein prosecution. | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | Judge Marra rules that federal prosecutors broke the law in the Epstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2019-02-15 | N/A | Publication of Miami Herald article regarding Jeffrey Sloman defending Alexander Acosta. | Miami/Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-02-04 | N/A | Approximate date ('Last week') it was revealed OPR opened investigation into Acosta. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-02-01 | N/A | Court ruled in favor of victims, stating prosecutors violated CVRA. | Florida federal court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that federal prosecutors broke the law regarding the E... | South Florida | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Judge Marra granted summary judgment to victims, ruling prosecutors violated the CVRA. | U.S. District Court | View |
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news report (likely the Miami Herald given the authors) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details a December 2007 letter from Alexander Acosta to Kenneth Starr, in which Acosta complains that Epstein is in violation of a September plea agreement and criticizes the defense team's stalling tactics. The page features a collage of photos including Epstein, Maxwell, Prince Andrew, Dershowitz, and others, though only the text is analyzed here.
This document, likely from a House Oversight investigation, details the 2011 fallout where victim Roberts publicly accused Epstein, Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. It describes Alexander Acosta's defense of his decision not to prosecute Epstein federally, citing a 'year-long assault' by Epstein's legal team. However, the report notes that documents show prosecutors capitulated to the defense team's demands, abandoning a prepared 53-page indictment from 2007.
This document appears to be a page from a 2018 news article (likely the Miami Herald) included in a House Oversight Committee file. It details the legal maneuvering by Epstein's high-profile legal team to avoid prison time for him and highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter and Detective Joseph Recarey to investigate Epstein despite the risks to their careers. The text describes the influx of underage girls to Epstein's Palm Beach compound and the wealthy environment of the island.
This document appears to be a page from a report or news article (likely the Miami Herald's investigation) included in House Oversight records. It highlights Alexander Acosta's personal involvement in legal negotiations as the U.S. Attorney in Miami, noting his subsequent position in the Trump Cabinet and consideration for Attorney General. It also references the Miami Herald's analysis of records identifying over 80 victims.
This newspaper article from December 8, 2018, reports that over two dozen U.S. lawmakers are demanding an investigation into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role as a former federal prosecutor in brokering a lenient 2008 plea deal for multimillionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The call for a probe, spurred by a Miami Herald investigation, highlights how the deal granted Epstein immunity, hid the proceedings from his underage victims, and allowed him to serve only 13 months in jail.
This document is a snippet from a news article by Marc Fisher, identified by the label 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022399'. The article discusses a lawsuit concerning a deal that federal prosecutors, including then-Labor Secretary nominee Alexander Acosta, made with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sex with minors. It also notes that President Trump was a witness in this lawsuit.
Refusing private 'interlocutory' appeals without staff present.
Instructed Sloman to stop copying him on emails relating to the Epstein matter due to conflict of interest.
Acosta affirmed he approved the NPA and accepts responsibility for it.
Acosta met privately with one of Epstein's lawyers, leading to the agreement to seal the plea deal.
Acosta admitted they didn't 'take a step back and say, let’s evaluate how this train is moving?'
Stating agreement already binds them not to make public except under FOIA; asking '[W]hat more does he want?'
Complaint that Acosta's office violated assurance not to contact identified individuals or potential witnesses.
Private meeting resulting in the agreement to seal the plea deal.
Stated Epstein received highly unusual treatment that undermined the purpose of a jail sentence.
Complaining that Acosta assured him the office would not contact identified individuals or witnesses.
Setting up a call to discuss 'who we tell and how much' and adding 'Nice job with a difficult negotiation.'
Claimed Acosta assured office would not contact identified individuals or potential witnesses.
Acosta met privately with one of Epstein's lawyers, leading to the agreement to seal the plea deal.
Criticism of the U.S. Attorney's office for intentionally withholding information from the court.
Response to Acosta regarding the agreement.
Thanked Acosta for commitment made during meeting; confirmed assurance that office would not contact identified individuals or witnesses.
Discussion regarding the non-prosecution agreement. Terms agreed upon included not notifying victims, keeping the deal under seal, and canceling grand jury subpoenas.
Acosta stated he did not know Epstein would receive liberal treatment while incarcerated.
Acosta stated he did not know Epstein would receive liberal treatment while incarcerated.
Acosta compelled to briefly address questions about the deal he approved for Epstein.
Asserted the deal was harsher than state prosecution would have been; described aggressive tactics by defense team.
Asserted the deal was harsher than state prosecution would have been; described pressure from Epstein's legal team.
Referenced communications with defense team.
Asserted the deal was harsher than state prosecution would have been; described assault by Epstein's legal team.
Described the 'yearlong assault' by Epstein's defense team and their aggressive tactics.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity