Department of Labor (DOL)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Contradiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board
|
Contradictory analysis |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Department of Labor-specific training session. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor (DOL) issued an implementing regulation for Executive Order 13496. | United States | View |
| 2010-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor issued a Final Rule implementing Executive Order 13496, effective June 21... | United States | View |
| 2010-05-20 | N/A | The Department of Labor issued a Final Rule implementing Executive Order 13496. | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing final rules from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning employer requirements for posting employee rights notices. The rules cover physical posting specifications (size, location) and new requirements for electronic distribution via intranet, internet, or email. Although the user prompt described this as an 'Epstein-related document', the content itself pertains exclusively to U.S. labor law and makes no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any associated individuals; its relevance may stem from being collected as evidence, as indicated by the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022298' Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022293.jpg
This document is page 54022 of the Federal Register from August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It explains the Board's reasoning for the precise content of a mandatory workplace notice informing employees of their rights under the NLRA, including the right to unionize and the right to refrain from union activity. Despite the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer and the prompt's framing, the document's text is exclusively about U.S. labor law and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or associated individuals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022284.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, not an Epstein-related document. It contains legal analysis by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) justifying a new rule that requires employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes arguments against the rule's validity, citing Supreme Court precedents and changing unionization rates, and compares the NLRA to other labor statutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022281.jpg
This document from the Federal Register discusses the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) statutory authority to issue a rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Board refutes arguments that a high standard of "necessity" or "grave and immediate danger" is required, citing legal precedents like Chevron and AHA to justify its rulemaking power. The text concludes that the notice-posting rule is a legitimate exercise of authority because effective enforcement of the NLRA depends on employees being aware of their rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022278.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, outlining the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) final rule requiring employers to post notices informing employees of their rights under the NLRA. It discusses the rule's legal basis, the public comment process that received over 7,000 submissions, and key changes made to the final rule. Though the prompt references Epstein, the content of this specific document is strictly about U.S. labor law and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012376.jpg
This document, page 5 of a submission to House Oversight, is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes regarding human trafficking. The DOJ opposes several provisions, such as extending a victim's 'continued presence' during a civil suit and removing the Attorney General's role in T-visa eligibility. The DOJ also recommends specific textual changes to avoid creating new legal liabilities for the government and to consolidate authority under the Attorney General rather than a new task force.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity