Rodgers
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of the witness. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hiring of Rodgers by Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness's initial estimated date of meeting Jane (later corrected). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Handover of records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Traverse City to Cahokia (CPS) for maintenance. | Traverse City to Cahokia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Columbus to Traverse City (TBC). | Columbus to Traverse City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights involving an unnamed female estimated to be 18 or 19 years old. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Atlantic crossing flights to Europe. | Atlantic Ocean/Europe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodgers visited Maxwell's 59th Street apartment | 59th Street near Columbus C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Refurbishment of first aid kits | Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight planning and logistics discussions. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Interlochen Center for the Arts. | Traverse City, Michigan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Employment of Rodgers by Epstein | Various (Flight crew) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony provided by pilots Visoski, Alessi, and Rodgers. | Court | View |
| N/A | Discussion | The witness (Rodgers) recalls being present to discuss the acquisition of a G2B aircraft. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness (Rodgers) is being questioned about flights they piloted for Epstein. | in-flight | View |
| N/A | Flight | Seven flights were taken to Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, particularly special guests, to the witness (Ro... | cockpit | View |
| N/A | Passenger interaction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including special guests, to the witness (Rodge... | Cockpit of a plane | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness, Rodgers, stated he took an unnamed male on seven flights to Interlochen. | To Interlochen, Michigan (v... | View |
| N/A | Flight | A series of flights to Interlochen that occurred in August, with one exception in July. The year ... | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014791.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed August 22, 2022). The judge establishes factual findings for sentencing enhancements, noting that Maxwell partially owned the jet, directed pilots (Visoski, Alessi, Rodgers) to transport victims, and acted as 'Epstein's number one' by managing his households and staff. The text explicitly mentions Sarah Kellen as Maxwell's personal assistant and applies sentencing guidelines based on Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00014790.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity for sentencing purposes. It details the hierarchy of the conspiracy, naming Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and identifying Virginia and Carolyn as recruiters of minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his unknowing facilitation of sexualized massages under the defendant's instructions and mentions pilots Visoski and Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00001276.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated March 22, 2021, discusses the legal standard for a defendant's third motion for release on bail. The central issue is whether the court has jurisdiction to decide the motion while the defendant's separate bail appeal is pending, with the document citing case law and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to outline the court's authority in such a situation.
DOJ-OGR-00001245.jpg
This legal document is a filing, likely by the government, arguing that the district court should deny the defendant's 'Third Bail Motion'. The primary argument is that the court lacks jurisdiction because the defendant has a simultaneous bail appeal pending in the Second Circuit. A secondary argument is that even if jurisdiction existed, the motion should be denied because the court has already twice found the defendant to be a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000866.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from September 22, 2021, detailing the procedural history of a defendant's third motion for release on bail. It outlines the dates of the defendant's motion, the government's opposition, and the defendant's reply. The document then discusses the legal standard regarding the court's jurisdiction to rule on the bail motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending in a higher court.
DOJ-OGR-00019061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a brief procedural exchange between the judge (THE COURT) and Ms. Comey about bringing the jury and a witness, identified as Rodgers, into the courtroom. After Ms. Comey agrees to the procedure, the judge gives the order to proceed.
DOJ-OGR-00019060.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a moment during a trial where the judge calls for a mid-afternoon break. The cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Everdell is paused, and the jury and witness are dismissed. The attorneys for the government (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Everdell) confirm they have no immediate matters to discuss, with Mr. Everdell noting he is less than halfway through his questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00019057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' annual flights to the Interlochen Arts Camp between 1991 and 1998 while employed by Mr. Epstein, and confirms Mr. Epstein had a cabin, referred to as a lodge, at that location.
DOJ-OGR-00019056.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. After a series of questions about aircraft ownership were objected to by Ms. Comey and sustained by the court, the questioning shifts to Mr. Rodgers' familiarity with a place called Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00019054.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's assets, specifically helicopters owned by a company called Air Ghislaine, Inc., and whether Epstein controlled these companies. The witness's employment history prior to being hired by Epstein is also questioned, with a mention of a company named Glimcher.
DOJ-OGR-00019053.jpg
This document is page 191 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that while Jeffrey Epstein controlled the aircraft, the Boeing 727 was legally owned by 'JEGE, Incorporated' and the Gulfstream by 'Hyperion Air.' The witness also estimates that Epstein purchased a Bell helicopter in November 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00019052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, a pilot. Rodgers testifies that he kept his own personal pilot logbook and did not send it to Ghislaine (Maxwell), nor did he have reason to believe she reviewed flight manifests or knew which passengers were on flights she did not attend. The questioning then shifts to the ownership of Mr. Epstein's planes (a Gulfstream and a Boeing) between 1994 and 2004, specifically regarding their ownership by LLCs.
DOJ-OGR-00019051.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00019049.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that their practice for keeping flight logbooks on Epstein's planes was to use initials for frequent passengers they recognized, such as 'SK', in order to save space. This establishes that initials in the logbook signify a recognized, repeat passenger.
DOJ-OGR-00019048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' specific habit of manually copying passenger names from official manifests into his personal pilot logbook. It also details his method for recording unnamed passengers using terms like 'one PAX' or noting their gender ('one female', 'one male') when specific names were unavailable.
DOJ-OGR-00019047.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the pilot's practice of maintaining passenger manifests and keeping track of passenger counts, distinguishing between FAA requirements and his personal practice. It specifically references 'Government's Exhibit 662,' which is identified as the witness's pilot logbook.
DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers, likely a pilot or flight crew member, was not always provided with the full names of passengers on flights. Rodgers confirms that passenger names were not considered critical information and that no airline regulations required them to collect this data.
DOJ-OGR-00019045.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of Sarah Kellen's phone number and the general logistical protocols for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding necessary details like destination and departure time.
DOJ-OGR-00019044.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on communications in the 2000s, specifically confirming that the witness used cell phones to communicate about flights with a Mr. Visoski and that they had Sarah Kellen's number programmed in their phone. The court briefly interrupts to admonish the speakers for talking over one another.
DOJ-OGR-00019043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Sarah Kellen became Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. It details her responsibilities, which included coordinating flight schedules with Larry Visoski and arranging luggage transfers to and from various residences.
DOJ-OGR-00019041.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The questioning focuses on the role of Sarah Kellen in late 2001, specifically whether she was acting as an assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or both. The witness confirms Kellen worked for both but expresses uncertainty about whether she was Epstein's 'primary' assistant at that specific time.
DOJ-OGR-00019040.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' interactions with Sarah Kellen in the early 2000s concerning flight scheduling. Rodgers states that another individual, Larry, the chief pilot, handled most of these communications and confirms that he first met Kellen in September 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00019039.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The testimony establishes the protocol for scheduling flights during the 1990s and 2000s: Rodgers only coordinated directly with Ghislaine when she was a passenger; otherwise, he coordinated with Epstein's secretaries. The testimony specifically identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary who handled these duties in the 2000s.
DOJ-OGR-00019038.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the communication methods used in the 1990s to schedule flights for someone named Epstein. It establishes that Rodgers and a colleague, Larry Visoski, would be contacted via beeper by Epstein's office and would then call back to speak with a secretary or assistant to arrange the flight.
DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
Pilot procedures during pre-flight preparations
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about the typical locations and duties of pilots (in the cockpit or baggage compartment) when passengers arrive for a flight.
Direct Examination regarding flight logs
Q&A regarding Mr. Alessi's role and the details of flight 979 on May 9, 1997.
Aircraft ownership and usage
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about the timeline and use of several aircraft, including a Hawker, Gulfstream, Boeing 727, and Cessna, owned by an unnamed individual.
Cross-examination regarding the duties of an unnamed woman.
A questioner cross-examines Rodgers, who confirms that an unnamed woman had extensive responsibilities including managing properties, hiring staff, overseeing renovations, and making purchases for residences and planes.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.
Redirect Examination
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
Recollection of flights to Interlochen
An attorney questions the witness, Rodgers, about their memory of specific flights. The attorney establishes that Rodgers' confidence in the details of the flights comes from reviewing flight records and a logbook, not from an independent memory of each flight.
Procedures for identifying flight passengers
A cross-examination where the witness, Rodgers, confirms they were not always given the full names of all passengers, that passenger names were not critical information, and that no airline regulation required them to gather the names.
A series of aircraft flights
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about flights from Columbus to TBC and a round trip from Traverse City to Cahokia, Illinois. The questioning covers the passengers on the first flight and the purpose of the second, which was for aircraft maintenance.
flights
The witness (Rodgers) confirms communicating about flights via cell phone during the 2000s.
Flight Scheduling
Coordination of flights with Epstein's secretary.
Flight Scheduling
Coordination of flights when Ghislaine was a passenger.
Plane issues
'She' was the point of contact for any issues regarding the planes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity