Martin G. Weinberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
29
Very Strong
|
36 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Corresponded |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert D. Balin
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICI
|
Professional licensing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Allan Fernich
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Represented by |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Court hearing to consider the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Telephone conversation regarding the status of the estate. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Martin Weinberg requests access to MCC video footage from USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled conference call regarding 'potential civil forfeiture issues' and investigation contacts. | Teleconference (Dial-in pro... | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled call regarding potential civil forfeiture issues in US v Epstein case. | Conference Call (Dial-in re... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Email inquiry regarding dismissal of indictment | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Preservation Request Submission | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Request for preservation of evidence sent by family attorney | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Conversations between the sender and Mike Miller/Marty Weinberg regarding the situation. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Communication regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, the release of a BOP press release, and the... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance for Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel | Court (Docket No. 19-2221) | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Martin Weinberg sent a document/attachment to a recipient who was out of office. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Follow-up letter received seeking preservation of records. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Court conference regarding scheduling, discovery, and trial date. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Conference (Court Hearing) in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490 (RMB)) to ... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Court conference | A court conference was held in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-30 | N/A | Anticipated deadline for initial discovery production mentioned by the government ('no later than... | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-29 | N/A | Renewal of admission to practice in the Court by Martin G. Weinberg | Court | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Formal preservation/production request made regarding NPA-related materials. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Submission of formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials in US v Epstein case. | N/A | View |
EFTA00028423.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 23-24, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY regarding a Protective Order for the Jeffrey Epstein case (indicated by attachment name '_JE_'). Weinberg outlines several objections to the government's draft, specifically concerning the handling of discovery materials at the MCC (where the defendant is held), the redaction of witness identities, and the labeling of FBI 302 reports. The chain concludes with the AUSA sending a revised order incorporating some edits for signature.
EFTA00028149.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.
EFTA00027977.pdf
This document is an email exchange from August 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's former defense attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Weinberg requests permission to view video footage of Epstein's jail cell and the hallway at the MCC from the morning of his death (August 10, 2019). The US Attorney's Office denies the request, stating they cannot share the information at that time due to their ongoing investigation.
EFTA00027975.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin G. Weinberg) shortly after Epstein's death in August 2019. Weinberg requests a 'taint team' protocol for computers seized from Epstein's Virgin Islands residence to protect attorney-client privilege, similar to protocols used for previous seizures in NYC. He also inquires about the timing of the dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi) and indicates the defense team wishes to speak with investigators regarding Epstein's death. Additionally, the emails note that Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, is represented by Stacey Richman.
EFTA00027176.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019 discussing the legal status of Jeffrey Epstein's estate shortly after his death. Attorney Martin G. Weinberg informs recipients that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands on August 15, 2019.
EFTA00024407.pdf
An email exchange dated August 14, 2019 (four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an individual addressed as 'Alex' (whose name is redacted in the header). Weinberg, along with 'Mike' (likely Michael Miller), states they are authorized to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues' regarding the US v Epstein case. The parties agree to a conference call scheduled for the following morning at 9:30 AM.
EFTA00024363.pdf
This document contains an email chain from August 10, 2019, the day Jeffrey Epstein died. The correspondence is between Epstein's defense team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ/SDNY). The emails discuss the immediate aftermath of the death, including the initiation of FBI and Attorney General investigations, the lack of information regarding the cause of death or suicide watch status ('status of observation'), and a specific request by attorney Michael Miller to delay the autopsy so the defense could hire a pathologist to be present.
EFTA00021745.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019 regarding the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP sent a letter to the Southern District of New York (SDNY), and an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) acknowledged receipt. The correspondence involves several other copied individuals, likely members of the legal defense team.
EFTA00021662.pdf
An email chain from July 26, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and redacted government prosecutors regarding the case US v Epstein. The discussion focuses on the logistics of discovery production, with Weinberg requesting specific priority access to search warrants and affidavits, and the government confirming an electronic production of evidence by the following Tuesday. Weinberg also mentions coordinating with 'Steptoe IT,' indicating collaboration with Reid Weingarten's firm.
EFTA00021650.pdf
An email dated July 23, 2019, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorney Martin G. Weinberg (copied to Michael Miller and Reid Weingarten). The email follows up on a morning conversation and attaches a proposed protective order for discovery related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (implied by '_JE_' in attachment filename).
EFTA00021545.pdf
An email exchange dated August 2, 2019, between defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg resends a document because a previous recipient was out of office, and the AUSA acknowledges receipt while requesting that three specific individuals be copied on all future correspondence.
EFTA00021400.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 15, 2019, between defense attorneys Reid Weingarten and Martin G. Weinberg and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the SDNY regarding bail topics for Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution asks specifically about information regarding a passport and whether Epstein holds citizenship or residency in any country other than the United States. Weingarten replies mentioning an 'unexpected potential conflict' and refers to the situation as a 'nightmare,' noting he is on the West Coast.
EFTA00021386.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 24, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence initiates with the AUSA requesting a call to discuss 'an incident involving Mr. Epstein at the MCC' (likely referring to Epstein's first suicide attempt or injury in jail). The emails primarily focus on scheduling this conference call for 3:00 PM that day and arranging to include attorney Mike Miller from the firm Steptoe.
EFTA00020956.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding Case 19-2221, United States of America v. Epstein. Dated August 5, 2019, it confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' on behalf of the United States. The filename suggests the appearing attorney is named DeFilippo. The notice was distributed to attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, among others.
EFTA00020919.pdf
This document is an email notification from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Epstein' (Case 19-2221), dated August 5, 2019. It notifies recipients, including attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, that a 'Defective Document' (specifically a notice of additional counsel) was filed on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes standard PACER notices and lists the recipients of the electronic service.
EFTA00020766.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 12-13, 2019, between defense attorneys Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) regarding the U.S. v. Epstein case. The correspondence concerns discovery requests, specifically regarding financial records from 'Institution 1' and details about 'two wires' that the defense wished to review prior to a hearing scheduled for the following Monday. The chain also includes a submission from the Government to Judge Berman's chambers attaching a reply in support of the detention memo and opposition to bail.
EFTA00020185.pdf
This document is a transcript of the initial court conference for United States v. Jeffrey Epstein held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman. Key topics discussed include the scheduling of a bail hearing, the controversy surrounding the 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) which the defense argues bars this prosecution, and the government's stance that the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York. The court also addresses Epstein's sex offender status, the recent search of his Manhattan townhouse, and sets a schedule for bail submissions and the next hearing on July 15, 2019.
EFTA00020174.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 14, 2019, four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death, between defense attorneys (Miller, Weinberg) and redacted government officials (likely SDNY prosecutors). The correspondence arranges a conference call to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues' and provides the defense team with contact information for the Assistant U.S. Attorneys specifically assigned to investigate Epstein's death. The document highlights the immediate legal shift toward asset forfeiture and the separate investigation into the circumstances of his death.
EFTA00020119.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Epstein's defense lawyers (Weinberg, Miller, Weingarten) dated August 22, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's death). The email discusses a scheduled call regarding civil forfeiture and formally requests that the defense team return or certify the destruction of all discovery materials due to the expected 'nolle order' (dismissal of charges due to death). The prosecution aims to advise the Court at an upcoming Tuesday hearing that no discovery obligations remain.
EFTA00019994.pdf
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on August 27, 2019, concerning the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death on August 10, 2019. Judge Richard M. Berman presides over the hearing, emphasizing the importance of transparency and victim involvement despite the defendant's death. The proceedings cover appearances by attorneys for both the government and the defense, and the judge's rationale for holding a public hearing on the matter.
EFTA00019956.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death, between government officials (likely SDNY prosecutors) and Epstein's defense team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten). The emails verify that a call from a BOP/MCC employee to Epstein's associates regarding the recovery of his body was legitimate and not a hoax, clarifying that the BOP contacted the next-of-kin (Epstein's brother) to prepare for transport once the body was ready. The government also confirms that an FBI investigation into the death has been initiated and is expected to be 'extremely rigorous,' while providing the FBI tip line for any relevant information.
EFTA00019950.pdf
This document is an email sent on August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The sender (likely a government official) writes to Epstein's legal team (Miller, Weinberg, and Weingarten) to forward a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) press release regarding the death and to officially confirm that an FBI investigation into the incident has been initiated.
EFTA00019937.pdf
This document is an email chain ending on August 10, 2019, in which Michael Miller contacts attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten to confirm news reports that Jeffrey Epstein had died the previous night. Earlier emails in the chain from July 26, 2019, discuss a formal preservation/production request for materials related to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the case of US v Epstein.
EFTA00019765.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 10, 2019, the day of Jeffrey Epstein's death. It involves communications between likely government officials (redacted) and Epstein's defense team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten) confirming the initiation of an FBI investigation, the distribution of a BOP press release, and a letter from the Warden. The emails note a lack of immediate information regarding the cause of death or the status of Epstein's observation at the time.
EFTA00019764.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 10, 2019, between a government official (sender redacted) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Miller, Weinberg, Weingarten). The emails discuss the immediate aftermath of Epstein's death, confirming that the Attorney General initiated an investigation and that the FBI has begun a rigorous inquiry. The sender notes they have not yet received details on the cause of death or the status of observation (suicide watch) at the time of the incident.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-16 | Paid | Martin G. Weinberg | FBI | $1,000.00 | Preauthorization for spending on FOIA search/pr... | View |
Request for intervention regarding FBI FOIA production delay
Requesting intervention to expedite production of a 12,000 page file and requesting a conference regarding FBI's FOIA responsibilities.
Follow-up on civil forfeiture
Voicemail left in the morning regarding civil forfeiture.
US v Epstein
Informing recipient that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands the previous day.
RE: Confidential - Epstein
Denial of request to share information/video footage; request for any useful information for ongoing investigation.
Confidential - Epstein
Request from Epstein's prior defense attorneys to view video footage of his jail cell and hallway at MCC from midnight to 7 AM on Aug 10, 2019.
Re: US v Epstein
Initial inquiry: 'Alex, Mike and I are authorized to continue the discussion of potential civil forfeiture issues with you. Are you available at 930 tomorrow morning?'
Re: US v Epstein
Confirming time works and asking for a dial-in.
Re: US v Epstein
Confirmation that the time works and request for a dial-in number.
Re: US v Epstein
Requesting availability for a call at 9:30 tomorrow to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues'. States he and Mike are authorized to continue discussion.
Re: US v Epstein
Inquiry about availability at 9:30 AM tomorrow to discuss potential civil forfeiture issues.
US v Epstein
Requesting taint team for seized Virgin Islands computers; asking about dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi); requesting call with death investigators.
US v Epstein
Requesting confirmation of preservation requests, requesting DNA testing on ligatures/bed stripping found in MCC cell, requesting taint review for seized emails, and inquiring about dismissal of indictment.
RE: US v Epstein
Formal request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and previous suicide attempt on behalf of his family.
RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Detailed request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and July 23 incident.
US v Epstein
Weinberg asks for response to letters from July 26 and Aug 1 seeking preservation/production. Specifically requests advising AUSAs in ND Ga and others to preserve records pending discovery requests due Sept 13.
United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)
Response denying broad discovery requests while affirming obligations under Rule 16 and Brady.
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Martin G. Weinberg is joining as additional counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
US v Epstein
Resending an attachment regarding US v Epstein because the original recipient was out of office.
RE: US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email and requesting that 'all three of us' be included on future emails regarding the case.
RE: US v Epstein
Confirming initial discovery production will happen no later than Tuesday in native electronic format (PDFs, JPEGs).
US v Epstein
Sending a more formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email regarding preservation/production; promising a responsive letter by Monday; asking for timing and format of discovery so Steptoe IT can prepare.
RE: US v Epstein
Weinberg requests the prosecution break out search warrants, affidavits, and returns from the main discovery production and email them to him and Reid Weingarten immediately.
US v Epstein
Sending a formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
US v Epstein
Stating intent to sign the Protective Order on behalf of the Epstein defense team and inquiring about the first wave of discovery.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity