Martin G. Weinberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
29
Very Strong
|
36 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Corresponded |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert D. Balin
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICI
|
Professional licensing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Allan Fernich
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Represented by |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Court hearing to consider the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Telephone conversation regarding the status of the estate. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Martin Weinberg requests access to MCC video footage from USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled conference call regarding 'potential civil forfeiture issues' and investigation contacts. | Teleconference (Dial-in pro... | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled call regarding potential civil forfeiture issues in US v Epstein case. | Conference Call (Dial-in re... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Email inquiry regarding dismissal of indictment | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Preservation Request Submission | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Request for preservation of evidence sent by family attorney | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Conversations between the sender and Mike Miller/Marty Weinberg regarding the situation. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Communication regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, the release of a BOP press release, and the... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance for Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel | Court (Docket No. 19-2221) | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Martin Weinberg sent a document/attachment to a recipient who was out of office. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Follow-up letter received seeking preservation of records. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Court conference regarding scheduling, discovery, and trial date. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Conference (Court Hearing) in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490 (RMB)) to ... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Court conference | A court conference was held in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-30 | N/A | Anticipated deadline for initial discovery production mentioned by the government ('no later than... | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-29 | N/A | Renewal of admission to practice in the Court by Martin G. Weinberg | Court | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Formal preservation/production request made regarding NPA-related materials. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Submission of formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials in US v Epstein case. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000406.jpg
This document is the cover page for the transcript of a court conference in the criminal case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding Magistrate Judge, Henry B. Pitman, and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as an FBI agent and an NYPD detective who were also present. The document was filed with the court on July 16, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000387.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference held on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein, with Judge Richard M. Berman presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other officials present, including an FBI agent, an NYPD officer, and two probation officers.
DOJ-OGR-00000386.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg of Boston, MA, to be admitted Pro Hac Vice, allowing him to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000364.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted "Pro Hac Vice," allowing him to practice in this specific case as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00000363.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for attorney Martin G. Weinberg. It certifies that Weinberg was admitted to the bar on April 24, 1972, and remained in good standing as of July 11, 2019. The document was filed on July 15, 2019, as part of Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), likely to establish Weinberg's credentials to represent a party in that case.
DOJ-OGR-00000361.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorney Martin G. Weinberg requests admission Pro Hac Vice (permission to practice in this specific jurisdiction for this case) to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg confirms his good standing with the Massachusetts Bar and provides his contact information in Boston.
DOJ-OGR-00000360.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order, issued by Judge Richard M. Berman, grants attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion for admission *pro hac vice*. This allows Weinberg, a member of the Massachusetts bar, to officially act as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in this specific criminal case.
DOJ-OGR-00000358.jpg
This is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB on July 15, 2019. In the document, Martin G. Weinberg certifies that he has electronically served a copy of a preceding document to Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller and all other relevant counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000326.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Weingarten, Weinberg, and Fernich) requested permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. Judge Richard M. Berman hand-wrote an order on the page granting the motion and requiring the materials be hand-delivered to chambers and opposing counsel by 9:00 AM the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00000321.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing dated July 11, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). In this motion, Epstein, through his attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich, requests permission from the court to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The document lists the contact information for the three defense attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000288.jpg
This document is the concluding section of a legal filing on behalf of Mr. Epstein, arguing for his pretrial release. The argument centers on the Sixth Amendment, stating that pretrial detention would materially impair his constitutional right to participate in his own defense, especially given the case involves voluminous discovery and events from over 14 years ago. The document concludes by asserting that Mr. Epstein is not a flight risk or a threat to the community and requests that the court grant his release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters journalist David Ingram to attorney Martin Weinberg, seeking comment on a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump committed rape in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to Kathy Ruemmler with the complaint attached. A significant portion of the communication between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031464.jpg
An email chain from April 2016 initiated by a Reuters reporter contacting Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this to Epstein, who forwards it to Michael Wolff. Wolff replies suggesting that 'Donald' (Trump) is the only person who can 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031449.jpg
This is the final page of a legal letter written by attorney Martin G. Weinberg regarding a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request concerning Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg is requesting intervention to expedite the release of a 12,000-page FBI file, complaining that after 28 months, only 700 redacted pages have been released. The letter is copied to James A. Baker, General Counsel of the FBI.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031447.jpg
This is a letter dated August 19, 2015, from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to the DOJ's Office of Information Policy, appealing on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein regarding the FBI's slow processing of a FOIA request. Weinberg argues that the FBI is failing to meet its statutory obligations, noting that only two batches of documents have been produced in over two years from a file exceeding 12,000 pages, and projecting that at the current pace, the file won't be fully processed until 2025. The letter references previous correspondence with FBI Liaison Dennis Argall and requests the OIP to compel the FBI to comply promptly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031431.jpg
This document appears to be an email fragment or draft containing a quote from a news summary regarding Epstein's defense team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, Weinberg) refuting federal sex trafficking allegations. It includes a link to a Miami Herald article. The footer contains a signature for Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm and a confidentiality disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Edward Epstein) and directs errors to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031417.jpg
This document is page 3 of a printed Washington Post article dated February 6, 2019, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It contains a statement from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, defending the non-prosecution agreement/plea deal as 'fairly negotiated' and reviewed by senior DOJ officials, while asserting Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations for over 10 years.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031410.jpg
This document appears to be the conclusion of an email sent by attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It quotes a response to a newspaper editorial regarding the Epstein case and Alexander Acosta, asserting there was no evidence of federal sex trafficking offenses. The document includes a strict legal disclaimer noting the content is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs error reports to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031406.jpg
This document appears to be the footer and signature block of an email from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez. It contains an excerpt discussing a response by Epstein's legal team (Starr, Goldberger, Sanchez, and Weinberg) to a 'Times editorial' regarding Alexander Acosta and federal sex trafficking allegations. The document includes a link to a Miami Herald article and a strict confidentiality disclaimer noting the information is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and referencing the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031401.jpg
This document is a printout of a Miami Herald article discussing the legal fallout and investigations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It details a DOJ investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the plea deal, initiated by members of Congress including Ben Sasse and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The article also mentions a letter to the New York Times from Epstein's legal team (including Kenneth Starr) defending the original deal, and an upcoming court hearing in New York regarding the unsealing of documents related to Epstein's crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031398.jpg
This document is a page from a Washington Post article printout containing a statement from Martin G. Weinberg, an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. Weinberg defends Epstein's plea deal, asserting it was fairly negotiated, rigorously reviewed by the Department of Justice, and that Epstein fulfilled all legal obligations including jail time and probation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031395.jpg
This document appears to be the footer of an email or legal correspondence from attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez of The LS Law Firm. It references other legal counsel associated with Jeffrey Epstein (Kenneth Starr, Jack Goldberger, Martin G. Weinberg) and links to a Miami Herald article. Notably, the legal disclaimer identifies the information as the property of 'JEE' (presumably Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016483.jpg
This document is the second page (signature page) of a legal letter dated January 4, 2019. It is signed by Robert D. Balin of the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. Copies were sent via email to Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifino and attorney Martin G. Weinberg. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016479.jpg
This document contains an email exchange from January 2019 and December 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, and Jack Browning (likely opposing or media counsel). Weinberg explicitly states that, on behalf of Epstein, they take 'no position' regarding a request to unseal appellate briefs, provided certain identities are redacted. The document includes contact information for Weinberg's Boston law office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018021.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a printout of a New York Times 'Letter to the Editor' published on March 5, 2019, written by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (including Ken Starr). The attorneys argue that the number of women involved in the investigation was exaggerated, deny the existence of an international sex-trafficking operation or sex parties at his home, and assert that Epstein is entitled to 'finality' regarding his plea deal. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-16 | Paid | Martin G. Weinberg | FBI | $1,000.00 | Preauthorization for spending on FOIA search/pr... | View |
Request for intervention regarding FBI FOIA production delay
Requesting intervention to expedite production of a 12,000 page file and requesting a conference regarding FBI's FOIA responsibilities.
Follow-up on civil forfeiture
Voicemail left in the morning regarding civil forfeiture.
US v Epstein
Informing recipient that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands the previous day.
RE: Confidential - Epstein
Denial of request to share information/video footage; request for any useful information for ongoing investigation.
Confidential - Epstein
Request from Epstein's prior defense attorneys to view video footage of his jail cell and hallway at MCC from midnight to 7 AM on Aug 10, 2019.
Re: US v Epstein
Initial inquiry: 'Alex, Mike and I are authorized to continue the discussion of potential civil forfeiture issues with you. Are you available at 930 tomorrow morning?'
Re: US v Epstein
Confirming time works and asking for a dial-in.
Re: US v Epstein
Confirmation that the time works and request for a dial-in number.
Re: US v Epstein
Requesting availability for a call at 9:30 tomorrow to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues'. States he and Mike are authorized to continue discussion.
Re: US v Epstein
Inquiry about availability at 9:30 AM tomorrow to discuss potential civil forfeiture issues.
US v Epstein
Requesting taint team for seized Virgin Islands computers; asking about dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi); requesting call with death investigators.
US v Epstein
Requesting confirmation of preservation requests, requesting DNA testing on ligatures/bed stripping found in MCC cell, requesting taint review for seized emails, and inquiring about dismissal of indictment.
RE: US v Epstein
Formal request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and previous suicide attempt on behalf of his family.
RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Detailed request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and July 23 incident.
US v Epstein
Weinberg asks for response to letters from July 26 and Aug 1 seeking preservation/production. Specifically requests advising AUSAs in ND Ga and others to preserve records pending discovery requests due Sept 13.
United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)
Response denying broad discovery requests while affirming obligations under Rule 16 and Brady.
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Martin G. Weinberg is joining as additional counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
US v Epstein
Resending an attachment regarding US v Epstein because the original recipient was out of office.
RE: US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email and requesting that 'all three of us' be included on future emails regarding the case.
RE: US v Epstein
Confirming initial discovery production will happen no later than Tuesday in native electronic format (PDFs, JPEGs).
US v Epstein
Sending a more formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email regarding preservation/production; promising a responsive letter by Monday; asking for timing and format of discovery so Steptoe IT can prepare.
RE: US v Epstein
Weinberg requests the prosecution break out search warrants, affidavits, and returns from the main discovery production and email them to him and Reid Weingarten immediately.
US v Epstein
Sending a formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
US v Epstein
Stating intent to sign the Protective Order on behalf of the Epstein defense team and inquiring about the first wave of discovery.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity