Pretrial Services
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Reporting | Defendant initially reported assets to Pretrial Services. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015137.jpg
This legal document details the sentencing and subsequent appeal of a defendant named Maxwell. Judge Nathan imposed a 240-month prison sentence, citing Maxwell's direct and prolonged participation with Jeffrey Epstein in a sex trafficking scheme involving underage girls, and also sentenced her to a $750,000 fine. The document notes that on February 28, 2023, the Second Circuit court affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, upholding the lower court's rulings on several key issues.
DOJ-OGR-00001447.jpg
This legal document, dated May 27, 2021, details the denial of a renewed bail request by a defendant named Maxwell on December 8, 2020. Judge Nathan denied the application, concluding that Maxwell remains a significant flight risk due to her substantial international ties, multiple citizenships, financial resources, and a history of providing incomplete information to the Court and Pretrial Services. The judge found that no combination of bail conditions could reasonably assure Maxwell's appearance at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001323.jpg
This legal document, page 6 of a filing from April 12, 2021, summarizes Judge Nathan's findings that defendant Ms. Maxwell is a significant flight risk. The judge's determination is based on the strength of the government's evidence, Maxwell's substantial international ties, multiple foreign citizenships (including French), significant financial resources, and a lack of strong ties to the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00001225.jpg
This legal document outlines a court's reasoning for continuing the pretrial detention of a defendant. The Court finds that the defendant has demonstrated a significant 'lack of candor' regarding her finances, particularly in representations made to Pretrial Services, and therefore poses a flight risk. A proposed $28.5 million bail package is deemed insufficient to reasonably assure her appearance at future proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00001194.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues on behalf of Ms. Maxwell for bail. It refutes the government's claims by stating that her relationship with her spouse is a strong tie to the country, and that discussions of divorce were a protective measure, not indicative of a weak bond. The document also asserts that Ms. Maxwell has been fully transparent about her and her spouse's finances, accusing the government of baselessly claiming she was deceptive rather than challenging the accuracy of the financial reports provided.
DOJ-OGR-00001168.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against a defendant's proposed bail package. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk because a new financial report reveals she has approximately $22 million in assets, far more than previously disclosed, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds. The Government further argues that the bond is effectively worthless because two proposed co-signers are UK residents, against whom the bond could not be realistically recovered if the defendant were to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00001117.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell has addressed the court's concerns about her finances, which were raised at an initial bail hearing. Her defense counsel hired a UK accounting firm, Macalvins, to conduct a thorough five-year financial analysis, and a former IRS Special Agent and Certified Fraud Examiner reviewed and validated this analysis as complete and accurate. The purpose is to demonstrate financial transparency to the court to establish suitable bail conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is addressing a judge. The attorney argues that their client, people close to the client, and even the law firm (Haddon Morgan) have received serious physical and death threats, which they present as a significant factor for the court's consideration. The attorney contrasts the reality of these threats with the government's alleged attempts to downplay them.
DOJ-OGR-00001029.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning the case against Ms. Maxwell. A speaker, likely the prosecutor, argues that Maxwell is a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, which involve an "ongoing scheme to abuse multiple victims" with Jeffrey Epstein, and her recent efforts to conceal her whereabouts in New England. The judge then questions a lawyer, Ms. Moe, about a defense claim that Maxwell had maintained contact with the government through her counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000410.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a detention hearing on July 16, 2019. The government's attorney, Mr. Rossmiller, argues that the defendant should be detained without bail pending trial, citing an extraordinary risk of flight and danger. The argument is based on serious charges, including a years-long scheme of trafficking and sexually abusing minors, and is supported by a recommendation for detention from Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00000331.jpg
This legal document, dated July 12, 2019, is a filing by the U.S. Government arguing for the pretrial detention of the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution refutes the defense's attempt to characterize the alleged crimes as 'simple prostitution,' asserting that under federal law, a minor cannot consent to being exploited, and coercion is not a required element for a child sex trafficking charge. Citing the defendant's history of abuse and past statements minimizing his conduct, the Government concludes that he poses a significant flight risk and danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00002248(1).jpg
This legal document is a court's justification for ordering the pretrial detention of a defendant. The Court finds that the defendant has demonstrated a lack of candor, misrepresented her financial situation to Pretrial Services, and poses a significant flight risk. Despite a proposed $28.5 million bail package, the Court concludes that no conditions of release can reasonably assure her appearance, thus warranting her continued detention.
DOJ-OGR-00002215.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues for her release on bond. It refutes the government's claims by explaining that a pre-arrest discussion of divorce with her spouse was a strategic measure to protect him, not a sign of a weak relationship. The document further asserts that Ms. Maxwell has fully disclosed her and her spouse's finances and accuses the government of baselessly claiming she was deceptive rather than challenging the accuracy of the financial report.
DOJ-OGR-00002177(1).jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against granting bail to a defendant. The prosecution contends that the defendant is a significant flight risk due to her extensive foreign ties, including citizenship in three countries, foreign property, and bank accounts. The filing also highlights her weak ties to the United States and points out inconsistencies in her statements, such as previously claiming to be divorcing the same husband she now cites as a reason to remain in the country.
DOJ-OGR-00001936.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 10, 2020, where a defense attorney argues about their client's financial situation. The attorney disputes the government's claims, stating the client does not have wealth comparable to figures like Madoff or Dreier, and criticizes the government for arresting her just before a holiday and then questioning her financial disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00022123.jpg
This legal document, filed on May 21, 2021, is a submission from the United States Attorney's office to the Court, signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Jessica Lonergan and Nicolas Roos. It addresses the scheduling of a court proceeding, stating that if the proposed date is inconvenient or if an in-person proceeding is desired, the parties can propose alternative dates. Copies were sent to Defense Counsel and Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00021964.jpg
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing about the pretrial release conditions for defendants Thomas and Noel. The conditions discussed include restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory mental health evaluation, as directed by pretrial services. An attorney, Mr. Foy, objects to one of the conditions, stating it was not part of a prior agreement on the terms of release.
DOJ-OGR-00021949.jpg
This document is a bail disposition and arraignment sheet for Tova Noel, dated November 19, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Noel pled not guilty and was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with travel restrictions and a requirement for mental health evaluation. A specific handwritten condition prohibits her from contacting her co-defendant (implied to be Michael Thomas) unless counsel is present.
DOJ-OGR-00020086.jpg
This legal document discusses the defendant's financial status and its implications for her bail conditions. It highlights that the defendant possesses significantly more assets ($22 million, including a $2 million London townhouse and over $4 million in unrestrained funds) than initially reported, making her a substantial flight risk. The document also raises concerns about the effectiveness of the proposed bail bond, noting that some co-signers are UK residents who haven't offered cash or property, and the defendant's $7 million attorney retainer is presumed unspent.
DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
This legal document is a court filing that analyzes a defendant's proposed bail package. The Court concludes that the package, including a partially secured bond and various release conditions like home confinement, does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The Court reasons that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth would plausibly allow her to flee and compensate third parties who supported her bond, and her arguments about illiquid assets are unpersuasive.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity