Bureau of Prisons
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's
|
Professional tension |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00000888.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) listing filings and orders between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records legal maneuvers including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding redactions and protective orders, and a Memorandum Opinion denying defense requests for victim identities and changes to confinement conditions. The page concludes with a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell regarding a previous memorandum and opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00000858.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing legal activities related to Ghislaine Maxwell between January 12 and January 25, 2021. The entries record the transmission of an appeal, a dispute over Maxwell's access to a laptop for discovery review involving the Bureau of Prisons, and the filing of numerous pretrial motions by her legal team to dismiss various charges. The document highlights the procedural back-and-forth between the defense, the court, and the Bureau of Prisons in the pretrial phase of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000850.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770) covering proceedings in August and September 2020. It details several legal motions, including the defense's failed attempts to compel the disclosure of victim identities, modify protective orders to use discovery in civil cases, and move Maxwell to the general prison population. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00000661.jpg
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00000658.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg describes the conditions at the MCC and SHU as 'medieval' and 'horrific,' citing vermin and lack of sunlight. He also explicitly states that the defense disputes the conclusions of the medical examiner regarding their client's death.
DOJ-OGR-00020665.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from May 12-14, 2021. It includes administrative orders regarding redactions and deadline extensions, as well as a significant order (Entry 282) denying Maxwell's request to alter prison protocols regarding flashlight checks. The Judge ruled that the 15-minute flashlight checks were necessary safety measures for high-profile inmates housed alone and that the defense's claims of sleep deprivation were unsubstantiated.
DOJ-OGR-00020662.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated May 3, 2021. It includes entries regarding the filing of transcripts, a memo endorsement regarding hard drives, and an order protecting the anonymity of a non-party alleged victim of sexual crime. A significant entry (Doc 265) details a dispute between MDC counsel and Maxwell's defense team regarding an incident on April 24, 2021, where MDC alleged defense lawyers violated BOP rules during a visit, leading to a request for video tapes of the encounter.
DOJ-OGR-00020635.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between August 18 and September 2, 2020. It details various motions and orders, specifically Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to unseal victim identities and be moved to the Bureau of Prisons' general population. The docket also records attorney appearances for the prosecution and procedural filings regarding protective orders and sealing requests.
DOJ-OGR-00020578.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet detailing the sentencing and subsequent appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June and early July 2022. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan sentencing Maxwell to 240 months in prison, recommending placement at FCI Danbury, and imposing a $750,000 fine. The document also logs Maxwell's immediate filing of a Notice of Appeal following the judgment.
DOJ-OGR-00020526.jpg
This document contains a court docket log for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing filings and orders from May 14, 2021, to May 17, 2021. Key entries include a detailed order addressing Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks at the MDC, which the court denied while urging the MDC to minimize disruption. Other entries involve extensions of time and rulings on redaction and sealing requests.
DOJ-OGR-00020508.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00020507.jpg
This document is a legal docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing court filings and orders related to Ghislaine Maxwell between December 31, 2020, and January 25, 2021. The entries show her attorney, Christian R. Everdell, filing motions for extensions and laptop access, Judge Alison J. Nathan ruling on these motions, and the filing of a notice of appeal. A key point of contention arises when the Bureau of Prisons requests the court to vacate an order that granted Maxwell laptop access for discovery review.
DOJ-OGR-00020500.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from August 25, 2020, to October 6, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests regarding victim identities, prison conditions, and modifications to a protective order. The docket also records Maxwell's subsequent appeal, the sealing of various documents, and the appearance of new defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020481.jpg
This document is page 4 of a judgment in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330), filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines the terms of her supervised release, specifying a term of 3 years for Counts 3 and 4, and 5 years for Count 6, to run concurrently. The document also lists mandatory conditions of release, including making restitution, submitting to drug testing, providing a DNA sample, and complying with sex offender registration requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00020477.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 91 of 91) covering the final judgment and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in June and July 2022. It details her sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment, a $750,000 fine, and the dismissal of specific counts, as well as her subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal. The document also includes administrative orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the docketing of previous correspondence and expert witness opinions.
DOJ-OGR-00020425.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from May 2021 regarding USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details legal motions and orders, specifically highlighting a dispute over Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, where her lawyers claimed flashlight checks every 15 minutes were sleep deprivation. Judge Nathan denied the request to alter BOP security protocols but urged the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption. The document also covers administrative motions regarding deadline extensions and the sealing/redaction of documents to protect third-party privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00020399.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 25, 2020, and October 6, 2020. It lists various filings including memorandum opinions denying defense motions, letters regarding protective orders, a notice of appeal, sealed documents, and an attorney appearance by Bobbi C. Sternheim. The entries record actions taken by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defense, and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00002272(1).jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 25, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan notes the receipt of a letter from the Bureau of Prisons requesting the court vacate a previous order that granted Maxwell access to a laptop for reviewing discovery on weekends and holidays. The Judge orders that both the Defendant and the Government may respond to the BOP's request within one week.
DOJ-OGR-00002270(1).jpg
This document is a letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 14, 2021, requesting a court order to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays to review discovery materials. The letter notes that the current prison computer lacks necessary software, the volume of discovery is massive ahead of the July 12, 2021 trial, and the government does not object to this request. It also highlights that Maxwell previously had daily access during a quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002268.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Christian Everdell to Judge Alison Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery laptop. The defense argues that the standard prison computer lacks necessary software to review voluminous evidence before the July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request. The letter highlights that Maxwell previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period in late 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00002268(1).jpg
A legal letter from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell weekend and holiday access to a discovery review laptop. The letter argues that current prison computers lack necessary software to review millions of documents before the July 12, 2021 trial, and notes that the government does not object to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00002267.jpg
This document is a webpage printout from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), dated January 4, 2021, and filed in a legal case. It outlines the BOP's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically its policy of reviewing inmates for home confinement based on risk factors defined by the CDC. This policy was implemented following a directive from Attorney General Barr on March 26, 2020, which led to a significant increase in inmates being placed on home confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00002058.jpg
This document is a confidential letter dated November 17, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, advocating for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The anonymous author attests to Maxwell's good character, offers a $2,000 bond, and describes a long-standing relationship with Maxwell and her family, arguing against flight risk and highlighting severe confinement conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00022136.jpg
This document is page 2 of a deferred prosecution agreement filed in May 2021 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT), likely concerning a Bureau of Prisons employee involved in the Epstein case (guards Tova Noel or Michael Thomas). The text outlines conditions of release, including mandatory cooperation with the FBI and DOJ-OIG regarding BOP activities, 100 hours of community service, and potential administrative termination of employment. The agreement allows for the deferral (and eventual dismissal) of prosecution if all conditions are met over a six-month period.
DOJ-OGR-00022129.jpg
This document is page two of a legal agreement, likely for deferred prosecution, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines strict conditions for an individual, including reporting to a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer, completing 100 hours of community service, and fully cooperating with investigations by the USAO-SDNY, FBI, and DOJ-OIG, particularly concerning their employment with the Bureau of Prisons. Failure to comply could result in the USAO-SDNY revoking the agreement and proceeding with prosecution.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity