Bureau of Prisons
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's
|
Professional tension |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00022122.jpg
This legal filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated May 21, 2021, informs Judge Analisa Torres about deferred prosecution agreements reached with defendants Noel and Thomas. The defendants, employees of the Bureau of Prisons, have admitted to falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019 and, in exchange for deferred prosecution, will cooperate with an OIG investigation and complete 100 hours of community service. The government requests a court hearing for May 25, 2021, to finalize these agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00022068.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the U.S. Government, filed on April 24, 2020, in opposition to a motion by defendant Michael Thomas to compel discovery. The Government argues that Thomas's request for materials—including a not-yet-existent DOJ-OIG report and documents about past incidents at the Metropolitan Correctional Center—is without merit because the items are not in the Government's possession or legally discoverable. The Government requests that the court deny Thomas's motion.
DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg
A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00022033.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed on behalf of defendant Michael Thomas, requesting the court to authorize the disclosure of investigative and disciplinary records from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The defense seeks information about a similar incident in 2005 or 2006, where officers received lenient punishment, arguing this is relevant to Mr. Thomas's state of mind ('mens rea') for the charges he faces related to an incident on August 10, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 19, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Figgins argues to the judge that an ongoing Inspector General's report investigating the Bureau of Prisons' supervision and policies is crucial for the defense. Figgins requests clarity on the status and release date of this report, citing media reports about testimony from the head of the BOP and statements by the U.S. Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021156.jpg
This document is page 4 of 8 from a judgment in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 CR 330 AJN), filed on June 29, 2022. It specifies the terms of her supervised release, which includes 3 years for counts 3 and 4, and a concurrent 5 years for count 6. The document also lists mandatory conditions, such as making restitution, cooperating with DNA collection, and complying with sex offender registration requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00019540.jpg
This is page 7 of a court order (Document 30, filed July 2, 2020) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines strict protocols for handling 'Confidential Information,' specifically prohibiting the use of such materials for civil proceedings and restricting the Defendant from possessing hard copies unless in the presence of Defense Counsel. It also establishes that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) will facilitate electronic access to discovery materials for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00019528.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, details the strict protocols for handling Confidential Information in a criminal case. It stipulates that such information can only be used for the defense of the current action, must be kept secure, and outlines specific rules for how the defendant can access it in hard copy (only with counsel present) and electronically (facilitated by the Bureau of Prisons). The Government's designation of information as confidential is binding unless overridden by a court order.
DOJ-OGR-00019509.jpg
This document is page 7 (filed as page 8 of 13) of a protective order in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It stipulates strict handling procedures for 'Confidential Information,' limiting its use solely to the criminal defense and prohibiting use in civil proceedings. It specifically mandates that the defendant may only review hard copies in the presence of counsel and that electronic access within the Bureau of Prisons must be facilitated by BOP officials.
DOJ-OGR-00019470.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket report for Case 20-3061, detailing filings and orders between August 20, 2020, and September 8, 2020. It records various legal actions including sealed documents, letter motions regarding protective orders and redactions, and memorandum opinions denying defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's requests regarding discovery and confinement conditions. The document also notes the filing of a Notice of Appeal by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019309.jpg
Page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing a Protective Order. It outlines strict conditions under which the Defendant and Defense Counsel may access 'Confidential Information,' prohibiting its use in civil proceedings and mandating that the Defendant only review materials under the supervision of counsel or via Bureau of Prisons protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00019275.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from August and September 2020 detailing proceedings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the denial of defense motions seeking the disclosure of victim identities, Maxwell's release into the general prison population, and modifications to a protective order to allow the use of discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the denial of the protective order modification.
DOJ-OGR-00019257.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Page 19 of 19) from September 2020 detailing procedural events in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to be released into the general prison population, to obtain victim identities immediately, and to modify a protective order to use discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding these denials and the transmission of the record to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, arguing on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text contends that Maxwell is being subjected to cruel punishment despite being innocent, asserting the government's evidence is weak hearsay and that she is being used as a 'scapegoat' due to the public outrage surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody (referred to as the 'Epstein Effect').
DOJ-OGR-00019806.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell between August 18, 2020, and September 8, 2020. It lists various filings including letters, motions, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery, protective orders, and conditions of confinement, as well as a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell. The entries document the denial of certain motions by the defendant and the scheduling of future disclosures and status updates.
DOJ-OGR-00019782.jpg
This is a page from the docket of a court case involving the USA and defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from August 20, 2020, to September 8, 2020. It lists various legal actions including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letter motions regarding protective orders and redactions, and two Memorandum Opinions and Orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying certain requests by the defendant. The document also notes a Notice of Appeal filed by Maxwell regarding one of the Memorandum Opinions.
DOJ-OGR-00019756.jpg
This page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell lists legal filings and orders between August 20 and September 8, 2020. Key entries include memoranda and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions regarding victim disclosure and prison conditions, as well as a notice of appeal filed by Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019704.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings between August and September 2020 regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists various filings including attorney appearances, sealed documents, letters concerning protective orders and redactions, and a Notice of Appeal. Notably, it includes a Memorandum Opinion and Order denying the defendant's requests for victim identity disclosure and release into general population.
DOJ-OGR-00010581.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's request for a lenient sentence. The prosecution refutes the defendant's claims of harsh pretrial confinement conditions, stating the Court was well-informed and the conditions did not warrant a downward variance. The filing also dismisses the defendant's comparison to the Harvey Weinstein case, asserting that her federal child exploitation crimes are different and warrant a significant sentence, citing a similar case (United States v. Maria Soly Almonte) as precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00010579.jpg
This document is a page from the Government's sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 22, 2022. The text accuses the defendant of lying to the Court about her guilt, refusing to disclose details about her marriage to the Probation Office, and drastically altering her reported net worth from $22 million (during bail hearings) to almost nothing (during sentencing). The Government argues that Maxwell accepts no responsibility and instead falsely portrays herself as a victim of various entities, including her father, Epstein, and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00003182.jpg
This legal document outlines the aftermath of a November 2018 Miami Herald report concerning Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It details a February 2019 court ruling that found the government violated victims' rights, leading to the recusal of the U.S. Attorney's Office. The document then describes Epstein's subsequent federal indictment and arrest in New York in July 2019, and the resignation of government official Acosta following a press conference where he defended his role in the original NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00004770.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on June 15, 2021. The Court recommends that Ms. Days be incarcerated at Danbury to facilitate family visitation and be enrolled in the RDAP drug treatment program, citing her benefit from coursework and mentoring. The Judge also issues instructions for Ms. Days to report to a probation officer within 72 hours of her eventual release.
DOJ-OGR-00004766.jpg
This document is a court transcript from June 15, 2021, in which a judge expresses profound frustration with the inhumane and mismanaged conditions at the MCC and MDC federal prisons in New York. The judge describes the facilities as being 'run by morons' and lurching from crisis to crisis, such as gun smuggling related to Jeffrey Epstein. While addressing an inmate, Ms. Days, the judge states that the conditions she endured were disgusting and inhuman, and wishes they could release her but is legally bound to a sentence of at least five years.
DOJ-OGR-00004746.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 15, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court concerning her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim complains about the recurring problematic conditions, over-management, and hyper-surveillance Ms. Maxwell faces at the MDC, arguing it impedes trial preparation and violates attorney-client privilege. The letter supports its claims by quoting Judge McMahon from another case, who strongly condemned the "disgusting, inhuman" conditions at the MCC and MDC and blamed the incompetence of the Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity