Bureau of Prisons
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's
|
Professional tension |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney's Office
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 |
EFTA00013342.pdf
This document is an email chain within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) discussing a legal challenge in the case United States v. Rivera. The judge and defense counsel questioned why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly greater access to laptops (13 hours/day vs 3) and video counsel visits than Justin Rivera (at MCC). The correspondence outlines the Bureau of Prisons' justification, attributing the disparity to Maxwell's protective custody status and massive discovery volume versus Rivera's general population housing.
DOJ-OGR-00000164.tif
This document excerpt details key events in the Jeffrey Epstein case, including his arrest on July 6, 2019, his detention in the Metropolitan Correctional Center, and his death on August 10, 2019. It also covers the controversy surrounding Acosta's handling of the Epstein investigation, leading to his resignation as Secretary of Labor on July 12, 2019, following media and Congressional scrutiny.
DOJ-OGR-00000106.tif
This document outlines standard conditions of supervision, likely for a probationer or individual on supervised release. It details requirements such as DNA collection, compliance with the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, participation in domestic violence programs, and reporting procedures to the probation office and court.
DOJ-OGR-00022708.tif
This document is a transcript of an interview or deposition involving Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion primarily revolves around Jeffrey Epstein's death, focusing on whether it was suicide or murder, and Maxwell's communications with Epstein, particularly concerning civil lawsuits and a period when he was angry with her.
DOJ-OGR-00022598.tif
Page 206 of a legal transcript featuring an exchange between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. Blanche questions Maxwell on whether she believes outside actors arranged for Epstein's death in prison to silence him regarding 'people he knew.' Maxwell denies this theory, stating she does not believe in the blackmail theories or that there was a 'hit' on him, suggesting instead that if it was murder, it was an 'internal situation' within the prison system.
DOJ-OGR-00014846.jpg
This court transcript page, filed on August 22, 2022, documents a hearing for Ms. Maxwell. Her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, requests she be designated to the women's prison facility in Danbury and enrolled in the Female Integrated Treatment (FIT) program; the court agrees to recommend this to the Bureau of Prisons. Subsequently, the government's counsel, Ms. Moe, moves to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlying indictments, a motion which the court grants.
DOJ-OGR-00001743.jpg
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated August 25, 2020. The judge denies Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to order the BOP to move her to the general population, citing that the request for identities is premature as discovery has just begun.
DOJ-OGR-00001722.jpg
This document is page 4 of a Government filing (Document 41) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), dated August 13, 2020. The Government argues against disclosing witness identities prematurely before the July 2021 trial to protect victim privacy. Additionally, the Government rejects the defendant's complaints regarding her confinement conditions at the MDC, asserting that monitoring protocols are appropriate for safety and security, and clarifying that attorney-client calls are visually observed but not audited.
DOJ-OGR-00001719.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated August 13, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution is opposing recent requests from the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, for an early disclosure of government witnesses and for the court to intervene with the Bureau of Prisons. The government argues these requests are premature and meritless, citing the early stage of discovery and previous denials of similar applications by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001713.jpg
This is a letter motion dated August 10, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense is requesting two court orders: one to compel the government to disclose the identities of 'Victims 1-3' mentioned in the indictment, and another to direct the Bureau of Prisons to move Maxwell to the general population to facilitate access to discovery materials. The document includes a handwritten and stamped order from Judge Nathan dated August 11, 2020, setting a deadline of August 13 for the government's response.
DOJ-OGR-00001696.jpg
Page 7 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed July 30, 2020) detailing a protective order regarding 'Confidential Information.' The text stipulates that the Defendant (identified as female) may only use such information for this specific criminal defense (not civil proceedings), may only review hard copies in the presence of Defense Counsel, and may only access electronic copies via the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).
DOJ-OGR-00001677.jpg
This page from a legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, outlines the rules for handling confidential information in a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It stipulates that such information must be used solely for the defense, kept secure, and details specific protocols for how the defendant can access it in both hard copy and electronic formats, the latter involving the Bureau of Prisons. The Government's confidentiality designations are binding unless overturned by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001458.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing from May 27, 2021, discussing Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints regarding her detention conditions at the MDC. It details Judge Nathan's review of Maxwell's request to stop 15-minute nighttime flashlight checks (increased from the standard 30 minutes). The text argues these checks are justified due to suicide risk factors, including her isolation without a cellmate and the stress of a high-profile case.
DOJ-OGR-00001417.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell is being subjected to abusive and inhumane conditions by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The filing claims this treatment is retribution for Jeffrey Epstein's death while in BOP custody. To support the claim of agency incompetence, it quotes District Judge Colleen McMahon from a separate case criticizing the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons.
DOJ-OGR-00001410.jpg
This legal document, dated May 17, 2021, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, a pre-trial detainee. It argues that the horrific conditions of her confinement—including sleep deprivation, contaminated water, surveillance of legal meetings, and overflowing sewage—make it impossible for her to prepare for trial. The filing renews a motion for bond and relief, referencing a prior district court order that admonished the Bureau of Prisons and the MDC to apply only necessary and standard security protocols.
DOJ-OGR-00001385.jpg
This document is the 'Conclusion' section of a legal filing (likely an appeal brief) dated April 19, 2021, arguing for the release of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense contends that Maxwell is not a flight risk, that the government's case is weak and based on 'old, anonymous accusations,' and that she cannot prepare for trial under her current 'appalling' prison conditions. The text heavily criticizes the government for relying on the specter of Jeffrey Epstein to justify her detention without a proper adversarial hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00001383.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues on behalf of Ms. Maxwell against the Government's handling of her abuse allegations. The defense claims the Government's conclusion that the abuse was 'unfounded' is a 'self-serving proclamation' based on a Bureau of Prisons video review that neither the prosecutors, court, nor defense have seen. The document demands the video be produced for review and accuses the Government of hypocrisy and a desire to humiliate Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan providing an update on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government asserts that Maxwell receives exceptional access to discovery materials (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) via both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints regarding missing emails, stating that an investigation revealed Maxwell deleted or archived them herself, with no evidence of MDC staff misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00001352.jpg
This legal document is the second page of a letter dated January 14, 2021, from attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests that the court order the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to grant his client, Ms. Maxwell, laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of discovery documents for her defense. The document includes a signed order from Judge Nathan, dated January 15, 2021, granting this unopposed request.
DOJ-OGR-00001351.jpg
A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order for the Bureau of Prisons to allow Ghislaine Maxwell access to a government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays. The letter argues that current restrictions hinder her ability to review voluminous discovery before her July 2021 trial, noting that the government does not object to the request and that she previously had full access during a COVID quarantine period.
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning United States v. Maxwell. The judge is ruling against Ms. Maxwell's motion for release, stating that unlike other cases, she has not argued specific health vulnerabilities to COVID-19. The court also rejects the argument that prison restrictions at the MDC prevent her from preparing her defense, noting the case is in early stages.
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney is arguing for the release of their client (inferred to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on the grounds that reviewing voluminous electronic discovery for 'conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old' is impossible while the client is in custody during the pandemic. The attorney notes the client is in 'administrative seg.' (segregation) because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein' (referencing his death in custody).
DOJ-OGR-00000988.jpg
This page is from a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated July 2, 2020, arguing for the defendant's detention pending trial. The government argues that despite COVID-19 concerns, the defendant should remain at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) like other inmates, citing her significant assets, foreign ties, and history of evading detection as flight risks. The document also introduces an argument based on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that victims and their counsel have been contacted and seek her detention.
DOJ-OGR-00000914.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing for her innocence. It claims the government's evidence is weak and consists of old, untested hearsay, and that the prosecution is motivated by the 'Epstein Effect'—a need for a scapegoat following the public outrage over Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody. The filing asserts that this effect has biased prosecutors, the Bureau of Prisons, and the public against her.
DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity