SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013178.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. She is questioned about a visit to Mr. Epstein's house with Virginia Roberts in 2002 and a subsequent interview with FBI Special Agents Nesbitt and Kuyrkendall in August 2007. During the testimony, Carolyn corrects the questioner's description of a woman she saw at the house.
DOJ-OGR-00013176.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorneys, including Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca, debate the appropriateness of discussing Carolyn's mental health and family issues, which are linked to past actions by someone named Epstein. The judge ultimately decides to move the sensitive discussion to the robing room to be held under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00013175.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. He requests permission from the judge to cross-examine a witness, Carolyn, on her extensive psychiatric history, drug abuse, and schizophrenia, arguing that the witness minimized these issues and her own testimony opened the door for this line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00013174.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorneys Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Pagliuca discuss procedural matters with the Judge, including objections to the relevance of upcoming witness testimony and the estimated duration (1-1.5 hours) of Mr. Pagliuca's cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The transcript captures the logistical coordination to ensure the jury is not left waiting.
DOJ-OGR-00013173.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge and attorneys Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Menninger about a potential violation of a witness sequestration order. The judge instructs the attorneys to brief the issue and schedules further discussion on whether a potential witness named Brian will testify.
DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the judge (The Court), Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach about several procedural matters. Key topics include the low probability of calling a certain 'brother' as a witness, a past request from a November 23rd pretrial conference to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with experts, and the government's request to speak with a witness named Jane about logistics after her testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00013170.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge and attorneys (Menninger and Rohrbach) are discussing the admissibility of testimony and potential violations of witness sequestration (witnesses speaking to each other). The Judge indicates he is unlikely to exclude testimony unless there was a 'knowing and full violation,' preferring to let the issue be handled during cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013169.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The Judge ('The Court') and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach discuss a male witness who seemingly violated instructions by discussing his testimony with his sister. The Court orders the government to conduct a full investigation into this transgression and produce the facts to the defense by the end of the day.
DOJ-OGR-00013168.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and an attorney (Mr. Rohrbach). The judge expresses concern about potential improper communication of testimony from a witness named Jane to her brother, suggesting a violation of the 'spirit' of a court rule. The judge recommends a full review of text and email communications and an interview with Jane to ensure there are no other conduits of information.
DOJ-OGR-00013167.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a discussion about newly discovered text messages between a person named Jane and her brother. The government attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, requests a delay in calling a witness, Brian, to allow time to analyze the messages. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, agrees but expresses concern about the piecemeal disclosure of information and requests a formal, under-oath representation from the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013166.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures the end of a discussion regarding a question with privacy implications during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, acknowledge the judge, who then calls for a 30-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013163.jpg
This document is page 150 of 264 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures a brief moment where the Court dismisses the jury for a one-hour lunch break during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Most of the page is blank, indicating the end of a session or section.
DOJ-OGR-00013161.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. Carolyn testifies about being taken to Mr. Epstein's home by another woman, who is suggested to be 'Roberts' and the arranger of the meeting. Before the trip, Carolyn states she was at the woman's house with Sean, Tony, and Virginia, and that the woman dressed her 'provocatively'.
DOJ-OGR-00013160.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on her first meeting with Virginia Roberts and a subsequent visit to Mr. Epstein's house in May or June of 2002. The testimony establishes that Carolyn had never been to the house or met Mr. Epstein before this visit and did not know his name until she arrived.
DOJ-OGR-00013158.jpg
This page contains a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness about her previous deposition testimony given in 2009 related to a civil lawsuit she filed against Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. The proceedings are momentarily interrupted to adjust the display size of an exhibit (3505-043) for the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013157.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on whether Carolyn was instructed by Ms. Roberts and/or a person named Virginia to lie about her age, claiming to be 17, to a man named Epstein. The transcript confirms Carolyn told the FBI this in 2007 and also discusses her first visit to Epstein's house, arranged by Ms. Roberts, to provide a massage for payment.
DOJ-OGR-00013156.jpg
This document is a page from a cross-examination transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Carolyn testifies that Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts) dressed her 'sexy' and 'provocatively' to take her to meet a friend (Mr. Epstein) in Palm Beach to make money. The testimony details that Roberts drove Carolyn to the location and told her they would massage Epstein together so Carolyn wouldn't feel uncomfortable, with specific instructions about clothing removal given in the massage room.
DOJ-OGR-00013155.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a prior conversation Carolyn had with a 'Ms. Roberts' about the possibility of making 'a lot of money real fast,' which Carolyn denies occurred as stated. The transcript also includes procedural discussions between the attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge regarding the witness's memory versus a document.
DOJ-OGR-00013154.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on a statement Carolyn allegedly made to the FBI in August 2007, claiming that a person named Virginia told her she could earn $300 by massaging a man in Palm Beach. Carolyn denies making that statement to the FBI at that time, asserting she was told about the massage opportunity later, at Mr. Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00013153.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on a conversation where Virginia Roberts approached Carolyn to meet an 'older man' friend in Palm Beach, potentially involving a massage for $300. Carolyn explicitly clarifies that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present during this specific conversation with Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00013152.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. An attorney questions her about a statement she allegedly made to the FBI in 2007, claiming Virginia offered her $300 at a party. Carolyn denies the accuracy of the statement, clarifying the event was not a party and took place at Virginia's house.
DOJ-OGR-00013151.jpg
This document is page 138 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The witness denies drinking alcohol or doing drugs and emphatically denies an allegation that Virginia Roberts approached her at a party about making $300. The witness confirms she first spoke to the FBI about Mr. Epstein in 2007. Attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey participate in the procedural handling of evidence binders.
DOJ-OGR-00013149.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn confirms she received wired money from a fund and, as a condition, signed a waiver agreeing not to sue any of Jeffrey Epstein's employees, which she understands includes a person named Maxwell. The transcript concludes with one attorney, Ms. Comey, finishing her questions and another, Mr. Pagliuca, beginning his cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00013148.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript of a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022. Carolyn testifies that she received approximately $250,000 in 2009 to settle a lawsuit against individuals named Jeffrey and Sarah. She also confirms receiving an award between $1 million and $3 million from a victim compensation fund for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, with the money coming from his estate.
DOJ-OGR-00013147.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Carolyn confirms her prior testimony from December 2009, stating she called Mr. Epstein's residence to arrange a paid massage. She recalls speaking with individuals named Sarah and Maxwell, or other household staff, who took messages for Mr. Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity