SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013963.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of Professor Loftus in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Loftus testifies about her expertise in memory science, specifically false memories, and details her academic career, including her current role at UC-Irvine and past positions at the University of Washington and the New School for Social Research.
DOJ-OGR-00013962.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of Elizabeth Loftus's direct examination. Ms. Loftus, identified as a professor and scientist, is called as a witness by the Defendant. The excerpt includes procedural discussions between Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Everdell, and THE COURT regarding the handling of an exhibit and the commencement of the witness's testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00013961.jpg
Transcript page from the cross-examination of witness Mr. Sud. Sud confirms he began booking travel for Jeffrey Epstein's office in 1999 and that the records being reviewed (Exhibit RS-1) cover the period from 1999 through 2006. Sud is subsequently excused from the stand, and the defense is invited to call its next witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013960.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the testimony of a witness named Sud, questioned by Mr. Everdell regarding the interpretation of columns in financial records (invoices) related to Epstein between January 1999 and December 2006. The witness confirms that the records list passenger names and invoice amounts.
DOJ-OGR-00013959.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Sud. The questioning focuses on a document labeled RS-1, which Mr. Sud confirms is an invoice from his QuickBooks accounting system. He further confirms that this invoice is related to a customer named Jeffrey Epstein and clarifies that the date on the document represents the date the invoice was issued.
DOJ-OGR-00013958.jpg
This court transcript dated August 10, 2022, captures a moment in a trial where defense attorney Mr. Everdell introduces 'Defendant's Exhibit RS-1'. He requests it be temporarily sealed to protect third-party personal information, a request to which the opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, does not object. The Court grants the request, admitting the exhibit under seal and allowing it to be presented to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013957.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness is questioned about a report from a company called Shoppers Travel, confirming that it is an accurate summary of invoice information related to 'Epstein' from January 1999 to December 2006. The witness affirms that it is the company's regular practice to enter this invoice data into their database on the same or next day.
DOJ-OGR-00013955.jpg
This court transcript excerpt, filed on August 10, 2022, contains the direct examination of a witness from the travel agency Shoppers Travel. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein's office was a customer, that the agency booked flights for them, and that in 2016, the witness was asked to generate a report from the company's QuickBooks system related to these activities. The questioning is leading up to the presentation of an exhibit marked RS-1.
DOJ-OGR-00013954.jpg
This document is page 95 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness named 'Sud' regarding the data entry of invoices and billing records into QuickBooks, specifically noting how individual passenger travel was often billed under a single company or group profile name.
DOJ-OGR-00013953.jpg
This document is a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. An unidentified witness testifies about their role at Shoppers Travel, which includes managing daily operations and customer travel bookings. The witness details the company's process for billing customers, which involves charging credit cards or accepting checks, and confirms that invoices are generated and recorded electronically in their QuickBooks accounting system.
DOJ-OGR-00013952.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Sud, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. Mr. Sud testifies that he lives in East Windsor, New Jersey, and is the Vice President of Shoppers Travel, a full-service travel agency he has worked for since its founding in 1988.
DOJ-OGR-00013951.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of Ms. Espinosa's testimony, confirming she worked at Jeffrey Epstein's Madison Avenue office but never at his homes or Palm Beach property. Following her dismissal, defense attorney Mr. Everdell calls the next witness, Mr. Raghu Sud, who is sworn in.
DOJ-OGR-00013950.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Ms. Espinosa. During questioning, Ms. Espinosa states that in the six years she worked for Ghislaine, she never saw Ghislaine or Jeffrey Epstein engage in any inappropriate activity with underage girls. The page concludes with counsel Ms. Pomerantz beginning her cross-examination of the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013949.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa states she left her job with Ghislaine after 9/11 to move back to California and be with her family. She speaks positively of her professional experience with Ghislaine, noting she was a 'very good resource' for her career, but objections are sustained when the questioning turns to personal feelings or experiences with 'Ms. Maxwell'.
DOJ-OGR-00013948.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that she worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002 and confirms she never saw Maxwell pregnant nor was told she was pregnant during that time. She also confirms having a videoconference with the government regarding the case in November 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00013947.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The questioning attorney attempts to establish the date of a prior videoconference interview between Espinosa and prosecutors. As the witness cannot recall the specific date, the attorney, Mr. Everdell, with the court's permission, directs her to a document to refresh her memory.
DOJ-OGR-00013945.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a short recess where the jury and witness, Ms. Espinosa, leave the courtroom. Upon returning, the Court instructs defense attorney Mr. Everdell to continue his direct examination of Ms. Espinosa.
DOJ-OGR-00013944.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about the timeline of a relationship between Ghislaine and Ted Waitt, estimating it began around 2001. The proceedings are then paused for a 15-minute break at the request of an attorney, Mr. Everdell, after he conferred with the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00013942.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on Espinosa booking hotels for Ghislaine Maxwell in Miami during the 2000s, establishing that Maxwell did not always stay at Jeffrey Epstein's residence when in Florida. The testimony also identifies Ted Waitt as a man Maxwell dated and eventually became a couple with during that time period.
DOJ-OGR-00013941.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Espinosa (Direct Examination). Espinosa clarifies the distinction between Epstein's assistant (an unnamed female) and Ghislaine Maxwell's assistant (Espinosa herself). The testimony confirms that during the 2000s, Ghislaine traveled with Epstein to his properties, including Palm Beach, but also made independent trips to Miami which Espinosa booked.
DOJ-OGR-00013940.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen in a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen arrived towards the end of Espinosa's employment, specifically between 2000 and 2002. Espinosa states she did not know Kellen's specific job title but observed that Kellen accompanied Jeffrey Epstein to his properties and was essentially always where he was.
DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013938.jpg
This document page is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the period between 2000 and 2002, covering the end of Espinosa's employment. Espinosa testifies that by this time, the romantic relationship between Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell appeared to be over, though Maxwell continued to work for Epstein in the same role, despite rarely coming into the office towards the end of that period.
DOJ-OGR-00013937.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that she perceived Jeffrey Epstein and Celina Midelfart to be a couple and notes that this relationship may have been concurrent with his relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell. She further confirms that she bought flowers for Midelfart on Epstein's behalf and that Ghislaine Maxwell was unaware of this specific action.
DOJ-OGR-00013936.jpg
This page of court testimony features the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa describes guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that doors were usually shut during visits. The questioning focuses on Celina Midelfart, confirming that Espinosa was tasked with sending her flowers, specifically orchids and bouquets. The page ends with the prosecution asking if Espinosa perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart, which draws an objection from defense attorney Ms. Pomerantz that is overruled by the court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity