SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00013995.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures the end of a session, likely the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, where the judge (THE COURT) announces a one-hour lunch break to an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, and the jury. The document was transcribed by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00013993.jpg
This page contains a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of memory expert Dr. Loftus, who testifies about the reliability of memory in relation to trauma and post-event suggestion. Loftus explains that while core details of traumatic events may be remembered, they are still subject to distortion, and discusses the correlation between memory confidence and accuracy under pristine conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00013991.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus testifies that human memory is a "constructive process," where recollections are built rather than simply replayed like a video. During the testimony, an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, successfully objects to a question on the grounds that it is leading, and the examination is continued by Ms. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00013990.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus by attorney Ms. Sternheim. The questioning concerns psychological concepts of memory, specifically the "forgetting curve" and "post-event information." Opposing counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, successfully objects to the line of questioning multiple times, with the court sustaining the objections and instructing the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00013989.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (Dr. Elizabeth Loftus) discussing the malleability of human memory, specifically how linguistic labeling (e.g., 'incident' vs. 'fight') can alter a person's recollection of events.
DOJ-OGR-00013988.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of expert witness Loftus. The testimony focuses on the suggestiveness of psychotherapy, the potential for creating false memories regarding childhood trauma, and the psychological concept of 'labeling' in relation to memory distortion.
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory. The witness advises using neutral questions to avoid contaminating a witness's memory and notes that stress is usually relevant to the time of the event itself rather than the interview environment.
DOJ-OGR-00013985.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. The witness, identified as Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), is testifying on direct examination about the concepts of 'post-event information' and 'post-event suggestion' and how conversations, biased interrogations, and media exposure can contaminate human memory. She also mentions her professional experience consulting with the FBI and Secret Service regarding interviewing techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the science of memory, specifically the 'retention stage,' and argues that as time passes, witnesses become more susceptible to 'post-event suggestion' which can contaminate, alter, or distort their memories.
DOJ-OGR-00013982.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific stages of memory: acquisition, retention, and retrieval. The witness describes how 'acts of retrieval,' such as conversations or police interviews, occur during the retention interval after an event.
DOJ-OGR-00013981.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the stages of memory—specifically retention, retrieval, and acquisition—and how psychological factors can affect memory accuracy.
DOJ-OGR-00013980.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of Professor Loftus by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, specifically discussing the 'acquisition stage' of memory. The transcript details a procedural moment where the defense requests permission to use courtroom monitors as a whiteboard for demonstrative purposes, to which the prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) has no objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013979.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the moment attorney Ms. Sternheim proffers Professor Elizabeth Loftus as an expert witness on memory science. After the court overrules an objection from Ms. Pomerantz and accepts Loftus as an expert, she begins her testimony by explaining to the jury that human memory is a complex, multi-stage process and not a simple recording device.
DOJ-OGR-00013978.jpg
This document is page 119 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It captures a brief segment of direct examination testimony from an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), confirming she has testified many times regarding the impact of post-event information on memory. The page contains very little text as the testimony continues on the next page.
DOJ-OGR-00013977.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the testimony of an expert witness named Loftus, who clarifies the scope of their expertise on memory. Loftus states they have testified in about 300 cases, primarily on the psychology of memory, memory distortion, and false memories, while distinguishing their field from neuroscience and deferring to other experts on topics related to brain structures like the hippocampus and amygdala.
DOJ-OGR-00013975.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the ethical review process for psychological experiments on humans, explaining how the requirement to 'cause no harm' limits the scope of research, particularly in studies on false memories. Loftus provides examples of both approvable and potentially unapprovable experiments that a 'human subjects review committee' might consider.
DOJ-OGR-00013974.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript where Professor Loftus is being questioned about a study on false memories. The study involved planting false memories in people's minds, such as witnessing parental violence or sexual activity as a child, and measuring their emotional reactions.
DOJ-OGR-00013973.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal case, specifically page 114 of 246. It involves questioning about language and memory, referencing a study published in 1978 and discussing how the wording of questions can affect witness recall of a simulated accident.
DOJ-OGR-00013972.jpg
This document is a legal transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, document 761, filed on August 10, 2022. It discusses experiments involving misinformation and its effect on memory, particularly in the context of simulated accidents and crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00013971.jpg
This document is page 112 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, a psychologist specializing in memory science, who testifies about receiving her Ph.D. in 1970 and publishing over 20 books and 600 scientific articles. The questioning attorney focuses on establishing the witness's credentials and the volume of her research.
DOJ-OGR-00013970.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations, including the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association, and the American Psychological Association, highlighting past presidencies and other leadership roles within these groups.
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific peer review process and her experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document appears to be part of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial records.
DOJ-OGR-00013968.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. Loftus discusses the funding for their scientific research, citing support from the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. They also state that they have consulted for numerous U.S. government agencies, including the Department of Justice, CIA, FBI, Secret Service, and IRS.
DOJ-OGR-00013966.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The witness discusses her professional accolades, noting that her CV is 47 pages single-spaced. She highlights her election to the United States National Academy of Sciences in approximately 2004 as her most prestigious award.
DOJ-OGR-00013964.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who testifies about her educational background at UCLA and Stanford, establishing her credentials in mathematics and psychology. The questioning focuses on the definition and contents of her Curriculum Vitae (CV) to lay the foundation for further expert testimony.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity