SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

Organization
Mentions
9811
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4779

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00014968.jpg

This document is page 92 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed 01/15/25) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on statistical methodologies for tracking sexual abuse disclosure rates, comparing retrospective studies with real-time data (such as children with STDs), and confirms the expert's opinion that childhood sexual abuse creates higher risks for victims.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014967.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal testimony from January 15, 2025, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio explains that their expert opinions on disclosure-related behaviors in both forensic and clinical practice are founded upon scientific and clinical literature. This literature includes research studies and anonymous surveys that determine the prevalence of traumatic events such as rape, sexual assault, and childhood sexual abuse, which in turn informs the understanding of disclosure patterns.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014966.jpg

This document is page 90 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio regarding forensic psychology practices, specifically concerning the evaluation of adults disclosing childhood sexual abuse and issues surrounding statutes of limitations. The witness describes the process of determining when a patient became aware of the connection between current difficulties and past abuse.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014965.jpg

This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio explains that in clinical settings, it is more effective to use specific behavioral descriptions when asking about sexual assault, rather than using labels like 'rape' or 'abuse'. This is because studies and clinical experience show that individuals may not self-identify with such labels even if they have experienced the described events.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014964.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, likely a psychologist. The testimony focuses on the clinical reality that very few victims of childhood sexual abuse disclose the abuse immediately, with discovery often happening accidentally in younger children. The witness confirms this is consistent with their private practice experience.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014963.jpg

This document is page 87 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, likely a clinical expert, testifies about the commonality of 'delayed disclosure' in victims of childhood sexual abuse, noting that disclosure is often delayed when there is a close relationship between the victim and the perpetrator. The witness explains that many patients first disclose abuse as adults, though some adolescents in inpatient settings also disclose.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014962.jpg

This is page 86 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio (likely a clinical expert), who is testifying about the importance of asking patients about their disclosure history regarding child sexual abuse. The witness explains that delayed disclosure often correlates with a lack of immediate medical care and that the response a victim receives upon disclosure significantly impacts outcomes.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014961.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the expert testimony of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio, a psychologist, explains the complexities of memory in victims of child sexual abuse, noting how dissociation can lead to remembering peripheral details instead of the abuse itself. The testimony serves to establish Dr. Rocchio's expertise in trauma psychology and introduces the topic of delayed disclosure.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014960.jpg

This document is page 84 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who appears to be an expert testifying about memory science. Rocchio explains to the court how sexual abuse survivors retain 'central details' (which they attached significance to) while 'peripheral details' may fade or change over time.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014957.jpg

This document is page 81 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio (likely an expert psychologist), explaining that studies show adolescents (ages 12-18) are statistically much more likely to delay disclosing sexual abuse until adulthood compared to other age groups. The witness attributes this to developmental stages where adolescents prefer confiding in peers rather than adults and desire to view themselves as competent.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014956.jpg

This document is page 80 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of an expert witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the psychological reasons abuse victims may not report crimes immediately, including shame, affection for the abuser, and fear of consequences. The witness defines the concept of 'delayed disclosure' specifically regarding sexual assault.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014955.jpg

This document is page 79 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. Dr. Rocchio defines grooming as a pattern of coercive control and testifies that a relationship of trust between a victim and perpetrator causes the victim confusion regarding what constitutes abuse.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014954.jpg

This document is page 78 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features direct examination testimony from a witness named Rocchio, likely an expert on sexual abuse dynamics. The dialogue focuses on comparing 'grooming' strategies used by pimps to procure victims for third parties versus grooming for direct abuse, with the witness confirming that the coercive behaviors and techniques remain the same regardless of who receives the sexual gratification.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014952.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. A witness under direct examination by Rocchio discusses the psychological mechanisms of how trust is established in abusive relationships, citing an example where a victim trusted their abuser because the abuser was best friends with an older, respected person in their 'troop'. The Court questions the witness on whether this specific scenario is documented in academic literature, and the witness clarifies that while the general principles of creating an 'aura of trust' are studied, this highly specific example may not be.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014951.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The discussion focuses on whether the presence of a single other individual helps create trustworthiness that facilitates abuse. The witness states that while specific literature on a 'single other adult' in child sexual abuse is scarce, pimping and trafficking literature supports group activity, and their own forensic experience confirms that offenders frequently surround themselves with others to facilitate abuse.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014950.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The judge questions the witness about the grooming process for sexual abuse, specifically whether the presence of a third party can facilitate the abuse by building a victim's trust. The witness provides general statements about how offenders create trustworthy environments, but the judge presses for specific literature to substantiate the claim that a third party's inclusion is a recognized strategy for building trust.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014949.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on January 15, 2025, showing the direct examination of a witness, Dr. Rocchio, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning centers on the concept of 'grooming by proxy,' a term the witness is unfamiliar with in scientific literature. The judge intervenes to clarify the witness's expert opinion: that the presence of another individual can facilitate the sexual abuse of minors.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014948.jpg

This document is page 72 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features a dialogue between the Court and a witness (Rocchio) regarding the forensic analysis of grooming. The witness explains that while prior sexual abuse increases vulnerability to subsequent abuse, that history alone does not determine whether grooming occurred in a specific instance.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014947.jpg

This page is a transcript from a court proceeding filed on January 15, 2025, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on the psychological definitions of 'grooming' versus 'consensual sexual activity,' with the witness clarifying that prior victimization increases the likelihood of subsequent victimization and risky sexual behavior in adolescents, rather than consensual activity leading to grooming susceptibility. The Judge (The Court) intervenes to clarify the distinction regarding susceptibility to grooming tactics.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014946.jpg

This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on whether a victim's prior sexual behavior or experience is relevant to their vulnerability to grooming. Rocchio testifies that there is no scientific literature or theoretical basis to support the idea that prior sexual activity makes someone more vulnerable to being groomed.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014945.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on January 15, 2025. It captures the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who refutes the suggestion that the targeting of vulnerable children for sexual abuse is merely 'clinical lore'. Rocchio asserts that this phenomenon is substantiated by multiple data sources beyond clinical observation, including prevalence data and studies of offenders.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014944.jpg

This document is page 68 of a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on expert analysis of 'Victim Selection' and the 'grooming process,' discussing scientific literature and professional agreement regarding behaviors used by offenders to build trust and attachment.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014943.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio, by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on the 'victim-selection model' as the first stage of grooming, discussing how offenders choose victims based on specific vulnerability factors established by professional literature and offender interviews.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014940.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of an expert witness named Rocchio. The witness discusses clinical psychology concepts regarding sexual abuse, specifically the 'revictimization literature' and how family vulnerabilities (such as a sick parent or lack of attention) allow perpetrators to 'befriend the family' to gain access to victims. The document is stamped with a filing date of January 15, 2025.

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014939.jpg

This document is page 63 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, likely an expert in psychology or forensics. Rocchio testifies about clinical training regarding 'vulnerability factors' and groups at higher risk for child sexual abuse, specifically mentioning that women and girls are a higher-risk demographic.

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity