This document is page 29 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Jan 15, 2025) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio establishes their credentials as an expert in psychology, specifically regarding traumatic stress and complex trauma. The testimony focuses on the nature of childhood sexual abuse, with the expert stating that most instances occur without physical force (using coercion/control) and are committed by people known to the child.
This document is a page from a court transcript, filed on January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio discusses their professional background, specifically their experience providing training on complex trauma and childhood sexual abuse to clinicians and investigators, including those at the Department of DCYF. They also mention how they stay current with scientific literature through memberships in professional organizations.
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who provides testimony regarding their professional training in trauma, childhood abuse, and forensic psychology. Rocchio also details their experience training others, including serving on ethics committees for psychological associations and supervising fellows at Brown University Medical School.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on Rocchio's professional background in psychology, including their involvement with the division of trauma psychology and leadership roles in the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, as well as their methods for continuing education.
This document is page 25 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. It features the direct examination of a witness identified as Rocchio by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness describes their professional responsibilities as the president-elect of the Division of Trauma Psychology within the American Psychological Association.
Page 24 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. The witness, identified in the header as Rocchio, is undergoing direct examination regarding their professional qualifications in the field of psychology. Rocchio testifies to holding leadership positions with the American Psychological Association (Division of Trauma Psychology and Ethics Committee) and the Rhode Island Psychological Association.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony focuses on establishing Rocchio's expertise, specifically their extensive experience as a peer reviewer for academic publications. Rocchio states they are on the editorial board for the journal of the Division of Trauma Psychology and also serve as a guest reviewer for other journals related to psychological injury and law.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio explains the peer-review process for professional presentations, comparing it to academic publication standards, and confirms that the majority of their presentations have focused on trauma psychology and interpersonal violence.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who explains the process of academic peer review for journals, describing it as a 'blind review' to prevent bias. Rocchio also confirms having given professional presentations and begins to define what they are.
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on 01/15/25. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the witness's academic credentials at Brown University and their expertise in traumatic stress and childhood trauma. During the testimony, Government Exhibit 1 is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, showing Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio states he is a clinical assistant professor at Brown University's Alpert School of Medicine since July 2020, where he supervises and teaches psychiatry fellows. The examination leads to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The witness testifies about their career experience in treating victims of childhood sexual abuse, stating they have worked with individuals aged 13 and up but currently focus on adults (18+) in both their clinical and forensic practices. The court interjects to clarify the distinction between these two areas of the witness's work.
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing the direct examination of a clinical psychologist named Rocchio. Rocchio testifies about their career specialization in traumatic stress and interpersonal violence, provides a clinical definition of "childhood sexual abuse," and states they have treated "hundreds upon hundreds" of victims. The testimony serves to establish Rocchio's expertise on the subject for the court.
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Rocchio (Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is testifying on direct examination about her professional background. She distinguishes her clinical practice, which focuses on treatment and therapy, from her forensic practice, which involves investigative roles, expert testimony, and objective evaluations in civil and criminal cases involving traumatic stress.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on January 15, 2025, capturing the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes their professional practice, stating they supervise seven clinicians and their primary clinical work involves treating adult patients for traumatic stress, including victims of interpersonal violence and first responders.
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Jan 15, 2025) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their postdoctoral work at Butler Hospital in an eating-disorder research group and a trauma psychology group, followed by the founding of their own independent psychology and forensic practice.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio describes their professional experience after obtaining a Ph.D., including a six-month period working at Yale Psychiatric Institute and a year-long postdoctoral fellowship in Rhode Island at Butler Hospital. During the fellowship, their primary focus was on dialectical behavior therapy for treating chronically suicidal and self-injurious women.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. The testimony covers Rocchio's professional background, specifically their graduate studies and a predoctoral fellowship at Yale University School of Medicine, focusing on their experience treating patients with severe mental health issues, traumatic stress, and childhood violence.
This document is page 10 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio, who defines 'interpersonal violence' and 'forensic psychology' for the court. Rocchio also testifies to having completed between 500 and 1,000 hours of clinical face-to-face work with patients during their Master's and Ph.D. studies.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on January 15, 2025. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of a government witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The transcript includes the witness being sworn in and receiving procedural instructions from the judge regarding microphone usage before the questioning commences.
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. The court discusses upcoming trial dates with counsel, proposing a final pretrial conference for November 23rd and discussing the start of voir dire on November 16th. Counsel Ms. Pomerantz (for the government) and Ms. Sternheim agree to the proposals, with Ms. Sternheim asking for a specific start time for the voir dire.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Judge sets a firm hearing date for November 15th to discuss jury questionnaires and motions in limine, specifically mentioning defense motions regarding co-conspirator statements, 'alleged victim 3', and Exhibit 52. The court also plans to address government motions seeking to exclude testimony from experts Dr. Loftus and Dr. Dietz.
This document is page 3 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. The Judge discusses the necessity of sealing portions of the proceedings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and outlines the schedule for addressing 'Daubert' issues first. The Judge also notes a high response rate for jury summons, with 565 prospective jurors having filled out questionnaires in two days.
This document is a court transcript from a pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on January 15, 2025. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The judge outlines the case schedule, noting that jury selection began on November 4th and the trial is set to commence on November 29th, and sets the agenda to address the defendant's motions to exclude evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity