SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.

Organization
Mentions
9811
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
4779

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00014877.jpg

This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).

Court transcript title page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014847.jpg

This court transcript from August 22, 2022, details a discussion about finalizing a judgment in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Court informs counsel of its decision to set the end date of the criminal conspiracy as July 2004, noting this differs from the government's previous position. The government's counsel, Ms. Moe, states she will review the exhibits and will only file a written objection if the date conflicts with the sentencing transcript.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014846.jpg

This court transcript page, filed on August 22, 2022, documents a hearing for Ms. Maxwell. Her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, requests she be designated to the women's prison facility in Danbury and enrolled in the Female Integrated Treatment (FIT) program; the court agrees to recommend this to the Bureau of Prisons. Subsequently, the government's counsel, Ms. Moe, moves to dismiss Counts Seven and Eight and any underlying indictments, a motion which the court grants.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014845.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 22, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge (THE COURT) and an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, regarding her client Ms. Maxwell's sentence. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Maxwell cannot pay a fine because a bequest she was to receive is 'unactualized,' but the Court counters that other assets exist and proceeds to formally impose the sentence.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014844.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a sentencing hearing filed on August 22, 2022. A judge sentences Ms. Maxwell to five years of supervised release and orders her to pay a $750,000 fine. The judge rejects the defendant's claim of inability to pay, citing her receipt of a $10 million bequest from Epstein as evidence of her financial capacity.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014843.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, detailing the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. The judge, citing Ms. Maxwell's lack of remorse, imposes a sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment, followed by five years of supervised release. The total sentence is composed of concurrent terms for Counts Three, Four, and Six.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014842.jpg

This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The presiding judge rejects Maxwell's complaints about her treatment at the MDC, noting she had ample resources for legal preparation. The judge criticizes Maxwell for a pattern of dishonesty regarding finances and deflection of blame, noting that while she acknowledged the victims' suffering, she failed to accept personal responsibility.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014839.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 22, 2022, in which a judge explains the reasoning behind the sentence for Ms. Maxwell. The judge states the sentence must reflect the gravity of her offense, her pivotal role, and the harm caused, while also serving as a deterrent to others. The judge explicitly notes that Ms. Maxwell's wealth and high profile are not factors in the punishment, but rather the principle that no one is above the law.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014838.jpg

This legal document, filed on August 22, 2022, details testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who describes being subjected to a long cycle of sexual abuse by the defendant (identified as Ms. Maxwell) starting at age 14. The defendant exploited knowledge of Carolyn's prior abuse by her grandfather. The document also notes that this was part of a broader pattern of criminal conduct where Ms. Maxwell and Epstein victimized multiple underage girls over many years, and it commends the bravery of the witnesses who testified at trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014837.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022, concerning the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker (likely the judge) describes Maxwell's conduct as 'heinous and predatory,' detailing how she recruited and groomed vulnerable minors for Jeffrey Epstein. Specific testimony from a victim named 'Jane' is cited, describing how Maxwell befriended her at age 14, normalized sexual abuse, and instructed her on how to sexually touch Epstein.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014835.jpg

This document is page 88 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the courtroom regarding sentencing guidelines, stating the applicable range is 188 to 235 months' imprisonment. The Judge outlines the legal requirements under *Booker* and 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) for determining a sentence that is 'sufficient, but no greater than necessary.'

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014834.jpg

This document is page 87 of the sentencing transcript for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It captures the conclusion of Maxwell's statement to the court, followed by procedural discussions between the Judge, defense counsel Ms. Sternheim, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding supervised release conditions and restitution. The court notes that while Count Six carries mandatory restitution, the government agrees none should be ordered as victims have already been compensated.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014833.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript, filed on August 22, 2022, capturing a statement from a defendant during their sentencing. The speaker apologizes directly to the victims for their pain, hoping their conviction and incarceration bring closure. They also reflect that Jeffrey Epstein should have faced justice years prior and lament the personal relationships they have lost due to the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014832.jpg

This document is a page from the court transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330). In this statement, Maxwell addresses the court, acknowledging the suffering of the victims and admitting her conviction for helping Jeffrey Epstein. She attempts to distance herself by characterizing Epstein as a manipulative man who fooled everyone, while stating that meeting him was the greatest regret of her life.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing statement)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014830.jpg

This document is page 83 of a court transcript from the sentencing phase of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The defense counsel is arguing for mitigation, highlighting Maxwell's age (over 60), lack of prior criminal history, and positive behavior while incarcerated at the MDC, specifically noting her move from solitary confinement to general population where she teaches English and GED classes to other inmates. The text acknowledges she is being sentenced for 'terrible conduct' but argues she poses no recidivism risk and has been an asset to her prison unit.

Court transcript / sentencing hearing record
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014829.jpg

This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The defense attorney argues for a lighter sentence based on 3553(a) factors, citing Maxwell's traumatic childhood marked by her brother's coma and death, and her 'narcissistic, brutish' father. The defense also attempts to mitigate her culpability by characterizing Jeffrey Epstein as 'controlling, demanding, [and] manipulative,' claiming he cast a deceptive shadow over her adulthood.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014828.jpg

This document is page 81 of a court transcript from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's requested sentence is disproportionate and notes that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 20 years. Sternheim explicitly argues that Jeffrey Epstein was 'far more culpable' than Maxwell, yet would have faced the same sentencing guidelines.

Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014824.jpg

This document is page 77 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. It contains testimony from a victim describing severe long-term medical and psychological issues (CRPS, PTSD) resulting from trauma. The speaker notes that the arrests of Epstein (2019) and Maxwell (2020) allowed them to finally disclose the abuse to others and feel validated 25 years after the initial meeting.

Court transcript (victim impact statement/testimony)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014822.jpg

This document is page 75 of a court transcript filed on August 22, 2022, containing a victim impact statement or testimony. The speaker describes how Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein manipulated them, including an incident in the fall of 1995 where Maxwell tracked the speaker down at Bloomingdales. The testimony details how the pair isolated the speaker by causing them to lose their job during a trip to Florida, subsequently trafficking the speaker to their friends.

Court transcript / legal filing (united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014821.jpg

This document is a transcript of testimony from a former salesperson at Henri Bendel. She recounts her first meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell, which led to an introduction to Jeffrey Epstein at a hotel under the guise of delivering purchases. The narrator states that this meeting resulted in the first of many sexual assaults committed against her by both Epstein and Maxwell, an event which caused her to 'crack' and impacted her education and career.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014819.jpg

This document is a victim's statement from a legal case, filed on August 22, 2022. The author details the profound and lasting personal trauma resulting from abuse, including professional and personal struggles, alcoholism, and suicide attempts. The victim recounts traveling to New York to attend Maxwell's trial, finding the testimony of other victims therapeutic, and expresses bewilderment at how Maxwell can maintain her innocence despite the guilty verdict.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014818.jpg

This document is a personal testimony, likely from a legal proceeding, in which the author recounts their experience with Epstein and Maxwell. The author describes how they manipulated her attempt to apply to the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) by controlling her application and weight, creating a 'no-win situation' she likens to human trafficking. The testimony concludes by detailing her escape to the U.K. in 2007 and the severe, long-lasting psychological trauma she has endured since, including a diagnosis of PTSD.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014816.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 22, 2022, from the case against Maxwell. It contains a portion of a victim impact statement and the beginning of testimony from another victim, Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome describes moving to New York at age 22, where she was met by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya, and speaks of the lasting trauma from the "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators."

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014815.jpg

This document is page 68 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 22, 2022. It contains the victim impact statement of an unnamed woman addressing Ghislaine Maxwell directly. The victim details the psychological trauma, nightmares, and trust issues resulting from the abuse and manipulation Maxwell facilitated and participated in. The victim asserts that Maxwell deserves to spend the rest of her life in prison.

Court transcript / victim impact statement
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00014813.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a victim impact statement directed at Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker describes Maxwell as a manipulative and cruel person who used kindness to exploit others. The statement emphasizes the speaker's solidarity with other victims ('sisters'), their refusal to remain afraid, and their determination to model empowerment for their daughter.

Court transcript (victim impact statement)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity