This document is a court transcript of a victim impact statement from a woman identified as "Jane Doe." She recounts being flown on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane to his Zorro Ranch in 2004 at the age of 15, where he sexually molested her and psychologically manipulated her. The testimony highlights Epstein's use of his connections to powerful individuals to intimidate his victims and the lasting trauma caused by his actions.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. It contains a portion of a victim impact statement delivered by Teala Davies, who describes being manipulated and victimized by Jeffrey Epstein as a vulnerable 17-year-old. Davies explains that she still considers herself a victim due to the lingering fear and the profound, lasting impact of Epstein's actions on her life.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, where an attorney, Ms. Allred, addresses the court on behalf of victims. She describes the case as being about power and the victims' fear of the rich and powerful, while expressing gratitude to the court for giving them a voice and demanding accountability for all conspirators. Ms. Allred then requests that two of her clients be permitted to address the court, a request which the judge grants.
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case against Jeffrey Epstein. An attorney representing Epstein's victims addresses the judge, thanking the court for allowing the victims an opportunity to be heard despite the defendant being deceased. The attorney also notes that there has been a suggestion for the court to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019. An attorney, Ms. Gibbs, reads a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 8' into the record. The statement addresses the victim's mixed emotions regarding Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, emphasizing that his death denied his victims the justice of a trial and sentencing.
This document is page 67 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains the concluding sentence of a statement made by 'Jane Doe 7,' expressing hope for healing and gratitude toward investigators and public servants working on the case.
This document is page 66 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). It contains a victim impact statement where an unnamed survivor addresses Judge Berman, discussing the trauma of silence, the need for justice over money and power, and expressing gratitude to the judge, the public, and fellow survivors.
This document is a victim impact statement from 'Jane Doe 7' filed on September 3, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The victim describes being unknowingly recruited by an agent and subsequently sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein at his New York City mansion. She details the severe psychological aftermath, including becoming a recluse, suffering from shame and guilt, and struggling with suicidal thoughts.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Teri Gibbs appears on behalf of attorney Lisa Bloom to read victim impact statements into the record, including a powerful statement from "Jane Doe 6" addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The statement describes the lasting harm caused by Epstein and asserts the author's identity as a survivor, not a victim.
This document is page 63 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement delivered in court following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker describes the lasting trauma of Epstein's abuse, expresses anger at the prison system for allowing Epstein to commit suicide (thereby denying victims their day in court), and concludes by reclaiming their identity as a survivor rather than a victim.
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the case of Jeffrey Epstein. It features a statement describing the abuse suffered by a victim named Jennifer and calls for justice against Epstein's enablers, followed by a personal victim impact statement from Ms. Aroz detailing the long-term trauma she endured.
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, concerning the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Mr. Boies briefly addresses the court to express pride in the women who came forward. Following him, attorney Kimberly Lerner introduces her client, Jennifer Aroz, to the court, describing Aroz as a brave survivor who initially thought she was the only victim, and explicitly characterizes Jeffrey Epstein as a predator and pedophile.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim's impact statement. The speaker recounts being taken by an acquaintance named Rena to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side, where she was sexually assaulted by both of them. The victim describes her feelings of betrayal and concludes by identifying as a survivor and thanking Judge Berman for the opportunity to speak.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on September 3, 2019. It features the testimony of Marijke Chartouni, who identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. She begins to recount how, at age 20, she was introduced to the situation by a friend named Rena.
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. Annie Farmer addresses the court, speaking on behalf of her sister, Maria Farmer, who reported Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for assault in 1996. Annie Farmer expresses disappointment regarding Epstein's death in government custody and urges the court to ensure that his accomplices are held accountable.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement by Sarah Ransome. Ransome identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking ring, thanks the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York, and urges them to continue their investigation, stating that Epstein did not act alone.
This document is a transcript of a court statement given by Virginia Roberts Giuffre on September 3, 2019. Giuffre identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, recounting how Maxwell recruited her at Mar-a-Lago just before her 17th birthday. She commends the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York for their investigation and expresses hope for justice and accountability for all victims.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, featuring a victim impact statement from an unnamed speaker. The speaker describes her trauma and calls for Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen to be held accountable for their roles in helping 'Jeffrey' (implied Epstein) perpetuate a system of abuse. The transcript concludes with Ms. McCawley introducing her client, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, as the next speaker.
This court transcript from September 3, 2019, captures a judge's opinion that the law is outdated regarding civil cases against deceased individuals. A representative for Mr. Epstein's victims then states their intention to pursue legal action against not only Epstein's estate but also his co-conspirators and enablers, who they allege were essential to his crimes.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where an attorney argues against an article by Professor Green that opposes victim participation in legal proceedings. The attorney contends this view is inconsistent with the Crime Victim Rights Act, especially in the context of Mr. Epstein's prosecution, and asserts that the purpose of modern criminal law is to mitigate harm to victims. The attorney also informs the court of their advice to their clients that the government must move to dismiss the case.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, capturing a dialogue between an unnamed speaker and a judge. The speaker commends the judge for allowing victims to be heard, citing it as a positive example that aligns with the Crime Victims Rights Act, and urges the judge to publish their remarks to guide other courts. The judge expresses gratitude for the speaker's presence and comments.
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019, where Paul Cassell, a law professor and former federal judge, addresses the court. He commends the judge's handling of victim impact statements and strongly urges the judge to publish their remarks as a formal opinion to promote transparency and set a legal precedent, referencing a case he wrote about, U.S. v. Heaton.
This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. It concludes a victim impact statement expressing frustration over Epstein's suicide escaping justice, but gratitude for the handling of the current case compared to the past. Attorney Mr. Edwards then addresses the court, referencing a 2008 case filed under the Crime Victims Rights Act and introducing his co-counsel, former judge Paul Cassell.
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated September 3, 2019, related to the case against Jeffrey Epstein following his death. It features a concluding statement from an unnamed victim expressing relief that Epstein can no longer harm anyone, followed by attorney Mr. Edwards introducing a letter from an absent client, Michelle Licata. Ms. Licata's statement, read by Brittany Henderson, describes abuse occurring while she was in high school and criticizes the government for the previous 'secret deal' (Non-Prosecution Agreement) made with Epstein without her knowledge.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity