SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001026.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. The Judge sets a firm trial date for July 12, 2021, and rules to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for discovery and defense preparation. The proceedings then transition to arguments regarding the government's motion for detention (bail hearing), involving attorneys Mr. Cohen (Defense) and Ms. Moe (Government).
DOJ-OGR-00001025.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding where the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) discuss scheduling. The court sets a trial date for July 12, 2021. The government, through Ms. Moe, requests that the time between the hearing and the trial be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for discovery and motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001024.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, documenting a scheduling hearing. The Judge sets the trial commencement date for July 12, 2021, and establishes a timeline for discovery disclosures and pretrial motions running from August 2020 through January 2021. Ms. Moe, representing the government, estimates the prosecution's case will take two weeks, but suggests blocking out three weeks total for the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001023.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court proceeding dated April 1, 2021 (likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell bail hearing). The text details the government's protocol for notifying victims via an opt-in process and outlines how three specific victims will participate in the bail hearing: one via memorandum, one via a statement read by the government, and one speaking directly. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Cohen confirm they have conferred and agreed upon a schedule with the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001022.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 1, 2021, is a transcript detailing the government's process for notifying victims following the arrest of a defendant on July 2 of the previous year. It outlines a timeline of actions taken in July, including notifying victims of the arrest, court hearings, and their right to be heard, utilizing direct contact, a victim services website, and letters. The notifications were sent to victims of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001020.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion between the judge, defense counsel (Mr. Cohen), and government counsel (Ms. Moe) about establishing a schedule for motions and discovery. Mr. Cohen clarifies the schedule by adding a previously omitted August 21 deadline for search warrant applications, which Ms. Moe confirms was included in a prior email to the judge's chambers. The parties are working to finalize deadlines for various legal filings in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001019.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021. The Judge is pressing Ms. Moe (likely a government attorney) on the thoroughness of discovery and timely disclosures. Ms. Moe confirms her team met personally with the FBI in Florida to ensure they obtained a 'comprehensive set of materials.' The Judge emphasizes that they must actively retrieve files rather than just accepting initial representations. The discussion then moves to setting a schedule previously discussed with Mr. Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00001018.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion about discovery materials. A representative, Ms. Moe, informs the judge that physical files from a prior F.B.I. investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Florida have been transferred to the New York F.B.I. office for scanning and review. The judge then inquires about the process for identifying and disclosing any other relevant information beyond these specific files.
DOJ-OGR-00001016.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, in which a government representative, Ms. Moe, outlines the scope of materials to be provided in discovery. These materials include search warrants, subpoena returns, electronic data, and files from a prior investigation in the Southern District of Florida. Ms. Moe also updates the court on the status of a proposed protective order being negotiated with the defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00001015.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021. During the hearing, the defendant, after confirming consultation with their attorney, waives the public reading of the indictment and pleads not guilty. The court accepts the plea and then transitions to a scheduling conference, instructing the government's representative, Ms. Moe, to provide a status update on discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00001014.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, covering the arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on a superseding (S1) indictment. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) explains that the new indictment includes a 'ministerial correction' regarding civil docket numbers in the perjury counts (Five and Six). The Judge questions both Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen, to ensure they have reviewed and discussed the changes.
DOJ-OGR-00001013.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where the judge justifies holding the proceeding with COVID-19 safety measures, referencing a national emergency and ensuring public trial rights are upheld. The judge then transitions to the arraignment, confirming with counsel Ms. Moe that it is for an S1 superseding indictment and asking for an explanation of the changes from the original indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001011.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning Case 21-770. It details a discussion between the Judge, Ms. Moe (Government), and Mr. Cohen regarding the necessity of conducting the arraignment and bail hearing remotely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court affirms that the proceeding cannot be delayed as the detained defendant is seeking bail and notes the significant public interest in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001009.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed April 1, 2021) documenting a videoconference hearing involving Ghislaine Maxwell and her attorney, Mr. Cohen. Ms. Maxwell is participating from the MDC in Brooklyn. The court confirms technical connectivity, establishes protocols for private attorney-client conversations via breakout rooms, and acknowledges receipt of a 'waiver of physical presence' form signed by Maxwell on July 10, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001008.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the beginning of a remote legal proceeding. The judge (THE COURT) confirms the presence of counsel (MS. MOE), a court reporter, and a Pretrial Services Officer (Leah Harmon). The judge states the purpose of the hearing—an arraignment, scheduling conference, and bail hearing—and explains it is being conducted remotely under the authority of the CARES Act due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00001007.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021, in Case 21-770. The judge begins by confirming that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, has a working audio and video connection. The discussion then turns to a technical issue raised by Ms. Moe, who reports that the public call-in line is full, and the court expresses concern about an alternative listening arrangement involving a speakerphone.
DOJ-OGR-00001006.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, for a hearing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Nathan. The transcript records the appearances of the legal counsel for both the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and the U.S. government. The government's counsel also requests permission for staff from the U.S. Attorney's office to be dialed into the hearing due to technical issues with an overflow line from Connecticut.
DOJ-OGR-00000723.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated 2019-09-03, detailing a witness's testimony about a traumatic encounter with Mr. Epstein. The speaker recounts how an 'audition' turned into a 'casting call for prostitution' and mentions Mr. Epstein's connections to powerful individuals like Bill Clinton. The court also expresses gratitude to all participants, victims, and attorneys for their contributions to the hearing and proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00000720.jpg
This document is page 82 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement where an unnamed woman describes the psychological devastation of realizing she was one of many young girls in a 'rotation' performing for Epstein for money. She details her background as a vulnerable 16-year-old and contrasts her naivety with Epstein's ability to manipulate powerful figures in the legal and scientific communities.
DOJ-OGR-00000719.jpg
This document is page 81 of a court transcript from the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490) filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a harrowing victim impact statement describing forceful sexual penetration, psychological manipulation, threats of ruin ("I'll bury you"), and the routine nature of paid sexual encounters at Epstein's mansion. The victim describes the involvement of assistants who managed the schedule and witnessed Epstein bragging about the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00000718.jpg
This document is a page from a victim's statement in the legal case against Jeffrey Epstein, filed on September 3, 2019. The victim provides a harrowing account of systematic sexual abuse, describing how Epstein groomed and molested her in his private massage room over several years. She recounts how he stole her virginity and then threatened to kill her, leaving her feeling powerless and describing their relationship as that of a slave to her master.
DOJ-OGR-00000717.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a victim impact statement, in which the speaker recounts their experience with a powerful and influential man. The speaker describes being manipulated through displays of power, such as phone calls to celebrities and claims of friendship with heads of state. The man specifically promised the speaker a letter of recommendation to Harvard, preying on their vulnerabilities and leading the speaker to conclude, 'I was the perfect victim'.
DOJ-OGR-00000716.jpg
This document is page 78 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, containing victim impact statements. One victim details the psychological trauma caused by Epstein, including a near-suicide attempt, and expresses frustration that his death allowed him to escape sentencing. The page concludes with the beginning of a statement from a second victim who describes being raped by Epstein when she was a 16-year-old virgin.
DOJ-OGR-00000715.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, Document 53, Filed 09/03/19, Page 77 of 86) containing an account from a victim. The narrator describes being a 15-year-old from a small Texas town, struggling financially after her mother's death, when she was approached by a 'lady' who worked for a 'very rich man'. The lady arranged for the narrator to play violin for this man, identified only as 'J or Jeff', which escalated over four visits from massages to forced oral copulation.
DOJ-OGR-00000714.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in which an attorney, Ms. Allred, reads a victim impact statement from her client, Jane Doe. The statement describes being molested by Jeffrey Epstein, a subsequent incident involving ATVs, and the feeling of powerlessness against Epstein and the 'system that supported him'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity