SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000684.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement from Anouska De Georgiou. She recounts being introduced to Jeffrey Epstein as a hopeful teenager and subsequently being manipulated, coerced, and sexually abused by him for years. De Georgiou describes the lasting damage to her life and ability to form relationships, and expresses solidarity with all of Epstein's other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00000683.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a victim impact statement from an unidentified woman describing the profound negative effects of Epstein's abuse on her career, relationships, and mental health, and expressing frustration that his death allowed him to escape justice. The speaker also mentions having written a 350-page book about her experiences.
DOJ-OGR-00000682.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing containing a first-person account of a sexual assault. The narrator describes being brought to 'Jeffrey's island' where an associate, Sarah Kellen, led her to a villa shared by Jeffrey and Ghislaine under the pretense of giving a massage, at which point Jeffrey raped her. The narrator states this was the beginning of three years of abuse and that she was hospitalized for two weeks following this initial assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000681.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from September 3, 2019, featuring the testimony of Chauntae Davies. She describes being mentally and physically traumatized, meeting Jeffrey Epstein through her massage teacher, becoming his apprentice, and being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell. Davies details how Epstein and Maxwell took her in, provided education and a job, and facilitated global travel, while also revealing her struggle with Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome.
DOJ-OGR-00000678.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It contains a victim impact statement from an unnamed former model who describes being sexually assaulted by Epstein, receiving money immediately after the act, and subsequently suffering from depression and leaving the modeling industry. The transcript concludes with Mr. Edwards introducing another victim, Jane Doe No. 4, who begins her statement.
DOJ-OGR-00000677.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where victims are giving statements. An unidentified speaker discusses the societal problem of victim-blaming. Another victim, Jane Doe No. 3, begins her testimony, recounting how she moved to New York City 15 years prior to pursue modeling and was subsequently introduced to Mr. Epstein by a woman who portrayed him as someone who could help her career.
DOJ-OGR-00000676.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unnamed victim testifies about a manipulative and abusive experience. The speaker uses an analogy of a frog in boiling water to explain the gradual nature of the abuse, which made it hard to recognize, and emphasizes that the victims were vulnerable and impoverished, not attempting to extort money. The testimony highlights the psychological impact, including intense self-blame and the burden of keeping the experience a secret.
DOJ-OGR-00000675.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It shows an attorney, Mr. Edwards, introducing his client as 'Jane Doe 2' to the court. Jane Doe 2 then begins her victim impact statement, speaking about the widespread nature of the trauma, the 'Me Too' movement, and her intention to address the difficult question of why victims stayed in the abusive situation.
DOJ-OGR-00000674.jpg
A page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, featuring a statement from a victim addressing the court. The speaker discusses the complexity of their trauma following the defendant's (Epstein's) alleged suicide, calls for an investigation into his death, and criticizes the media for treating the situation as entertainment rather than focusing on the core issues of exploitation and coercion.
DOJ-OGR-00000673.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing victim impact statements in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Courtney Wild identifies herself as a victim of Epstein's sexual abuse for years, accusing him of manipulating the justice system and calling him a coward for dying before he could be confronted in court. An attorney, Mr. Edwards, then introduces his client, Jane Doe No. 1, who begins her own statement by referencing Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000672.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). An attorney representing victims addresses the court, thanking the Judge and the U.S. Attorney's office for their treatment of the victims. The attorney introduces Courtney Wild, a client who sought help in 2008, to speak to the court; Ms. Wild then spells her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00000670.jpg
This document is a transcript of an attorney speaking in court about their representation of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. The attorney explains that an initial FBI investigation was resolved through a "secret deal" that prevented over 30 victims in Florida from participating in a hearing, denying them their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The speaker emphasizes that this treatment by the criminal justice system exponentially aggravated the harm caused by Epstein's abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00000668.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mr. Edwards addresses the court regarding his clients (victims) who wish to speak, establishing protocols for those who wish to remain anonymous ('Jane Doe'). Edwards also acknowledges presentations made by attorneys Weingarten and Weinberg, expressing professional respect for Weinberg despite the adversarial nature of the case, and references the 'tragic ending' (Epstein's death) in relation to potential civil rights violations.
DOJ-OGR-00000667.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on September 3, 2019. The judge asks counsel for the victims, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Boise, to follow certain procedures. Attorney Brad Edwards, from the firm Edwards Pottinger, identifies himself and states that he represents 15 victims present in the courtroom and at least 20 others who could not attend, citing reasons such as fear of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00000663.jpg
This court transcript from a hearing on September 3, 2019, details an argument by Ms. Comey against the court conducting its own investigation into the death of Mr. Epstein. She informs the court that an active and separate investigation is already being conducted by a grand jury, Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York, and the FBI. Ms. Comey asserts that such an investigation is the proper function of these entities, not the court, especially concerning uncharged matters.
DOJ-OGR-00000661.jpg
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00000659.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on September 3, 2019. Epstein's defense counsel argues to the judge that Epstein's suicide on August 10 was 'implausible' given the pending legal motions scheduled for August 12, including a bail appeal and document production requests. The counsel also asserts that the initial autopsy findings on August 11 were inconclusive and reiterates the defense stance that the New York prosecution violated the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
DOJ-OGR-00000658.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg describes the conditions at the MCC and SHU as 'medieval' and 'horrific,' citing vermin and lack of sunlight. He also explicitly states that the defense disputes the conclusions of the medical examiner regarding their client's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000657.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019. It captures a dialogue between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Weingarten, regarding the government's motion to dismiss an indictment. Mr. Weingarten clarifies that while his clients want the court to investigate the underlying events, they ultimately support the motion to dismiss the indictment itself.
DOJ-OGR-00000656.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding where an unnamed speaker argues for the court's supervision of an investigation into components of the Department of Justice. The speaker highlights the 'dreadful' and 'disgraceful' conditions of the local jail where Jeffrey Epstein was held, claiming they are worse than at Guantanamo. The core argument is that court oversight is necessary to maintain public confidence in the justice system and to uncover the truth about the situation.
DOJ-OGR-00000655.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, where a lawyer, Mr. Weingarten, argues that the court has the authority and public duty to investigate the death of his client, Jeffrey Epstein. Weingarten emphasizes the intense public interest and conspiracy theories surrounding the death, and specifically references a prior incident on July 23, 2019, described as an alleged attempted suicide, as a matter the court had already shown interest in.
DOJ-OGR-00000654.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney discusses the death of their client, Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the video surveillance tapes from outside Epstein's cell are the most critical piece of evidence and questions the official narrative, suggesting that the tapes being corrupted or inoperative on the specific day of his death points towards foul play rather than long-term incompetence.
DOJ-OGR-00000652.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weingarten addresses the court regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, alleging that prison employees falsified information and ignored orders never to leave Epstein alone. Weingarten states that despite the medical examiner's conclusion of suicide by hanging, the defense has received medical evidence suggesting the injuries were more consistent with assault.
DOJ-OGR-00000651.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, detailing a conversation between the court, Ms. Comey, and defense counsel Mr. Weingarten. After confirming a protective order is self-executing, Mr. Weingarten begins to address the court about recent, serious events concerning his client's incarceration, referencing public statements by the Attorney General about "improprieties in the jail" and the subsequent removal of the warden and suspension of guards.
DOJ-OGR-00000650.jpg
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in which a representative for the government addresses the court regarding the victims in the case. The speaker confirms that efforts were made to notify all known victims of the proceeding, in compliance with the Crimes Victims' Rights Act, and notes that both the U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI have been in contact with them. The government also commits to continuing to provide services to the victims even if the indictment is dismissed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity