SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001055.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a speaker is arguing for bail for a defendant. The speaker cites several precedent cases (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis) to demonstrate that defendants in serious cases, including organized crime, massive financial fraud, and violent acts, have been granted release on bail conditions and have consistently appeared for trial. The argument aims to persuade the judge that release on conditions is appropriate in the current case as well.
DOJ-OGR-00001054.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is arguing for bail for their client. The attorney cites two legal precedents, the Bodmer case (2004) and the Khashoggi case (1989), to counter the government's position. The argument focuses on the principle that a foreign national's home country's non-extradition policy should not automatically preclude them from being granted bail in the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00001053.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal transcript dated April 1, 2021, where an attorney argues about bail conditions for a defendant. The attorney references several legal precedents (Khashoggi, Bodmer, Hanson, Sabhnani) to assert that international ties and financial means should lead to stricter bail conditions, not a denial of bail. The current defendant is described as a citizen of England and France with three passports, who has traveled internationally and has financial means, and the attorney cites the Sabhnani case, which involved allegations of holding individuals in slavery, to support their argument regarding bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. An attorney, Mr. Cohen, is arguing a point by citing past high-profile cases like Madoff, Dreier, and Esposito. The judge interrupts to question the relevance of these precedents, specifically asking if those defendants had substantial international connections, which distinguishes them from the current case. Mr. Cohen admits they did not, highlighting that the current defendant's foreign ties are a key point of contention.
DOJ-OGR-00001051.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on April 1, 2021, where a defense attorney argues for their client's pretrial release. The attorney contends that the government has the unwavering burden to prove the client is a flight risk and has failed to do so, citing precedent from the Supreme Court and a Second Circuit case written by Judge Raggi. The attorney also informs the court that they have proactively prepared a bail package for consideration, subject to verification by Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00001049.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 45, filed on 04/01/2021) regarding a bail hearing. Defense counsel is arguing for the release of their client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case ID context), asserting that while the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) gives victims a voice, it does not give them a 'veto' over a defendant's right to release. The counsel cites Judge Orenstein's opinion in *United States v. Turner* (2005) to support the argument that victim objections regarding flight risk should not automatically deny bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an attorney is addressing a judge. The attorney argues that their client, people close to the client, and even the law firm (Haddon Morgan) have received serious physical and death threats, which they present as a significant factor for the court's consideration. The attorney contrasts the reality of these threats with the government's alleged attempts to downplay them.
DOJ-OGR-00001047.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues to the Judge that the government is unfairly introducing new facts late in the process, depriving the defense of a written response. Cohen then pivots to defending his client's character, explicitly stating she is 'not Epstein' and not a 'monster,' emphasizing her strong family and professional support network present on the call anonymously for safety reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00001046.jpg
A transcript from an April 2021 court hearing where defense attorney Mr. Cohen argues for the release of his client (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on bail. Cohen cites the Bail Reform Act, the difficulty of preparing a defense during the COVID crisis while in custody, and explicitly argues that his client is 'not Jeffrey Epstein' and is being unfairly portrayed by the government and media as a 'sinister person.'
DOJ-OGR-00001045.jpg
This page of a court transcript records the conclusion of a victim impact statement by Ms. Farmer urging the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell due to flight risk and the severity of her alleged crimes. Following this, the Court confirms with the government representative, Ms. Moe, that there are no other victims wishing to speak and clarifies that the government is not seeking specific findings regarding danger to the community for pretrial detention purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00001044.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the beginning of a victim's testimony. A victim, identified as Annie Farmer, begins her statement by accusing Ghislaine Maxwell of being a sexual predator who groomed and abused her when she was 16. The transcript also includes a quote from a 'Jane Doe' expressing fear that the accused is a flight risk with international connections.
DOJ-OGR-00001043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring a victim impact statement or testimony arguing against granting bond to Ghislaine Maxwell. The anonymous speaker describes Maxwell as a 'predator and a monster' who manipulated them to satisfy Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker reveals a specific incident where they received a late-night phone call threatening the life of their two-year-old child if they testified in a previous civil action.
DOJ-OGR-00001042.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Prosecutor Ms. Moe reads a written statement from an anonymous victim ('Jane Doe') to the court. The statement accuses Ghislaine Maxwell of sadistic manipulation, claiming she was 'in charge,' recruited other victims for amusement, and was essential to Jeffrey Epstein's ability to commit abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00001041.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the government's argument for detaining a defendant pending trial. The government's representative, Ms. Moe, asserts the defendant is an extreme flight risk, citing her possession of three passports, large sums of money, and international connections. The court clarifies that the government's argument is based solely on flight risk and not on any danger the defendant poses to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00001040.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on April 1, 2021, where a government representative argues against granting bail to a defendant. The government contends the defendant is a flight risk due to her unexplained wealth, lack of ties, and willingness to hide, pointing out that she has refused to provide financial details and has proposed an unstable living arrangement of staying indefinitely at a luxury hotel in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00001038.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, where a speaker, Ms. Moe, is arguing that the defendant is a flight risk. Ms. Moe presents evidence of the defendant's significant wealth, citing bank records from January 2019 that show an annual income between $200,000 and $500,000, a net worth over $10 million, and a trust account with over $4 million in assets.
DOJ-OGR-00001037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. It features a dialogue between the Court and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the details of the defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) arrest. The discussion focuses on the defendant's refusal to open the door for law enforcement and the specific allegation that she attempted to block location monitoring by wrapping a mobile phone in foil.
DOJ-OGR-00001036.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021, involving prosecutor Ms. Moe and the Judge. Ms. Moe argues that the defendant (contextually Ghislaine Maxwell) poses a flight risk because she successfully purchased real estate under a fake name and lived undetected for a year. The Judge questions why this specific information was not presented until the government's reply brief.
DOJ-OGR-00001035.jpg
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, capturing a dialogue between a judge and Ms. Moe regarding a defendant's bail. The judge raises the issue of the defendant's motive for hiding—whether it was to evade authorities or for privacy from the press, especially given the public interest following Mr. Epstein's indictment. Ms. Moe argues that the motive is irrelevant; the crucial fact for the bail determination is that the defendant has demonstrated a clear ability and willingness to live in hiding.
DOJ-OGR-00001034.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) filed on April 1, 2021. It details arguments made to a Judge regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's deceptive behavior. The text reveals that in November 2019, Maxwell used the alias 'Janet Marshall' and was accompanied by a 'Scott Marshall' (who claimed to be retired British military) to tour and attempt to quickly purchase a property via wire transfer and an LLC. The prosecution argues this demonstrates Maxwell's willingness to use aliases, hide her identity, and conceal assets from the court and Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00001032.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court case, specifically a discussion regarding the defendant's financial information. The court questions Ms. Moe about the defendant's reported income and the government's perspective on its plausibility.
DOJ-OGR-00001031.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, in which a representative for the government argues that a defendant is a significant flight risk. The argument is based on the defendant's dual citizenship in France and the United Kingdom, her property ownership in the UK, and her access to significant undisclosed wealth. The government asserts that extradition would be impossible from France and a lengthy, uncertain process from the UK, creating a real concern that she could live beyond the reach of US justice indefinitely.
DOJ-OGR-00001029.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning the case against Ms. Maxwell. A speaker, likely the prosecutor, argues that Maxwell is a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, which involve an "ongoing scheme to abuse multiple victims" with Jeffrey Epstein, and her recent efforts to conceal her whereabouts in New England. The judge then questions a lawyer, Ms. Moe, about a defense claim that Maxwell had maintained contact with the government through her counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00001028.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. In it, a speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues before a judge about the seriousness of the charges against an unnamed defendant. The allegations, detailed from an indictment, include transporting and enticing minors for sexual abuse, perjury, and conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to sexually exploit girls as young as 14.
DOJ-OGR-00001027.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) involving a detention hearing. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the female defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell) should be denied bail because she poses an extreme flight risk, has significant undisclosed financial means, strong international ties, and is charged with the sexual abuse of minors. Defense attorney Mr. Cohen is present, and the judge indicates that alleged victims will also be heard.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity