SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00000649.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government is addressing the court, stating that despite the dismissal of the indictment, related investigations and the possibility of civil asset forfeiture will continue. The speaker also confirms that defense counsel is complying with a protective order to return discovery materials and reaffirms the government's commitment to the victims of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000648.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the court to support the dismissal of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death, citing Second Circuit law requiring abatement. Crucially, she states that this dismissal does not stop the government's ongoing investigation into potential coconspirators or future prosecutions of new defendants.
DOJ-OGR-00000647.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, concerning the Epstein case (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The text details a legal argument regarding the 'rule of abatement,' debating whether proceedings/forfeiture should cease after a defendant's death, especially in light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The speaker concludes that if abatement applies to convicted defendants (citing the Wright case), it applies even more strongly to Epstein, who died during the pretrial phase.
DOJ-OGR-00000646.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019. It discusses the legal concept of 'abatement' following the death of a defendant, citing the Second Circuit case *U.S. v. Wright*. The text explains that upon a defendant's death during a pending appeal, the conviction, indictment, restitution, and forfeiture orders are typically vacated.
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript or filing where the speaker argues that a court must independently evaluate a government's motion to dismiss and is required to consider the victims' views before making a decision. The speaker cites the case of United States v. Heaton and the expert opinion of former Judge Paul G. Cassell, who concluded that the Crime Victims' Rights Act gives victims broad rights in such matters. The speaker expresses full agreement with this viewpoint, despite some factual differences between the current case and the Heaton case.
DOJ-OGR-00000643.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, concerning the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The speaker discusses the government's motion to drop the charges (nolle prosequi), which was filed by the U.S. Attorney on August 19, 2019. The speaker argues for the importance of a public hearing for transparency and notes the inclusion of victims in the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00000642.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where an unidentified speaker critiques an article from the New York Law Journal. The speaker refutes the opinions of two professors who argued against holding a public hearing and allowing victims to speak in the Jeffrey Epstein case, calling their suggestions 'incredulous' and incorrect as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00000640.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from a case filed on September 3, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It records the opening of the proceeding where the Judge asks for introductions. Government attorneys Maureen Comey and Alison Moe introduce themselves, noting the presence of FBI Special Agent Amanda Young and NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, while defense attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin Weinberg, and Michael Miller (of Steptoe & Johnson) introduce themselves.
DOJ-OGR-00000621.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on August 6, 2019. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Ms. Moe (representing the government), and Mr. Weinberg (representing the defense) to schedule future court dates. Key dates set include an appearance on October 28, a briefing deadline on February 24, 2020, and an oral argument on March 12, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00000620.jpg
This is page 9 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The Judge (The Court) rules to exclude time from the Speedy Trial Act calculations to allow for extensive pretrial preparation and tentatively schedules a trial for June 8, 2020. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg requests oral arguments for motions, which the court schedules for October 28, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000619.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on August 6, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues for a 13-month timeline to prepare for trial, citing the need to litigate a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), unseal files for potential witnesses, and difficulties working with Epstein under current jail conditions. The Court responds by setting a monitoring period and excluding time through June 8.
DOJ-OGR-00000618.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court transcript from August 6, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg agrees the case meets complexity criteria for an extension. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues against a delay until September, advocating for a trial in May or June due to the 'public interest' in a swift resolution and the significant time passed since the charged conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (the federal case against Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The transcript records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg regarding the scheduling of the trial. They agree to target September 2020 for the trial date, as Mr. Weinberg argues that 13 months is necessary to prepare for a case of this 'magnitude and scope.'
DOJ-OGR-00000616.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing on August 6, 2019, where Epstein's lawyer, Mr. Weinberg, requests a trial date of Labor Day 2020. Weinberg cites the need to review over a million pages of discovery and address complex constitutional issues related to Epstein's previous Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and double jeopardy protections. The text also notes Epstein's incarceration at the MCC and the defense's intent to file early motions to dismiss based on the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00000615.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 6, 2019, detailing a conversation between the judge and defense counsel, Mr. Weinberg, about scheduling a trial. Mr. Weinberg requests a preliminary trial date after Labor Day to allow time to assess his client, Mr. Epstein's, 'ability'. The judge questions this request in light of a presumed desire for a speedy trial, to which Weinberg responds by citing the length of the trial and the timing of discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00000614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 6, 2019. In it, a representative for the government, Ms. Moe, proposes a detailed schedule to the court for the defense to file discovery-related and pretrial motions, with corresponding deadlines for the government's responses. Ms. Moe concludes by requesting that the court schedule a trial for June of the following year.
DOJ-OGR-00000613.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The text details a scheduling conference where prosecutor Ms. Moe proposes an October 31 deadline for discovery. She notes a specific exception regarding materials seized from the defendant's New York residence, which the F.B.I. is currently reviewing, necessitating a privilege-review protocol with defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000612.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 6, 2019. It pertains to a conference held on July 31, 2019, in the criminal case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The document lists the presiding judge, Hon. Richard M. Berman, and the attorneys appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000609.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 26, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. The judge tentatively schedules a conference for the parties on July 31st and grants a motion from the government, represented by Ms. Moe, to exclude the intervening time under the Speedy Trial Act. The judge justifies the exclusion as necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice and ensure effective legal representation for all parties.
DOJ-OGR-00000608.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court transcript (filed July 26, 2019) detailing a judge's rationale for denying bail to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights testimony from victims Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild regarding their safety, the seriousness of sex trafficking charges involving minors as young as 14, and evidence of witness intimidation. It also details Epstein's flight risk, citing his private planes, foreign residence in Paris, and items seized from his NYC mansion, including $70,000 cash, diamonds, and a fake Austrian passport.
DOJ-OGR-00000607.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a judge's oral ruling, filed on July 26, 2019. The judge explains the decision to deny a bail package, finding that the government has sufficiently proven the defendant is both a danger to the community, including minor victims, and a flight risk. The judge deems the proposed bail package "irretrievably inadequate" and expresses doubt that any conditions could mitigate the danger posed.
DOJ-OGR-00000606.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 26, 2019, in which a judge orally delivers a ruling concerning Mr. Epstein. The judge denies the defense's application for pretrial release and grants the government's application for continued remand, meaning Mr. Epstein will remain in custody. The judge states that a full written opinion will follow, which will address issues such as dangerousness, risk of flight, and the proposed bail package.
DOJ-OGR-00000605.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.
DOJ-OGR-00000584.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated July 24, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490 (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Courtney Wild addresses the court, identifying herself as a victim abused by Epstein starting at age 14 in Palm Beach, Florida. She urges the judge to deny Epstein bond and keep him in detention, citing public safety concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000583.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing filed on July 24, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It features testimony from Ms. Farmer confirming Jeffrey Epstein's inappropriate conduct toward her. Subsequently, attorney Brad Edwards introduces his client, Courtney Wild, identifying her as the 'Jane Doe' in a 2008 civil lawsuit against the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act connected to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity