Event Details
June 20, 2011
Description
Receipt of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecutor | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Juror Conrad | person | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009453.jpg
This document is an exhibit (A-5849) filed on Feb 24, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), but originates from a 2012 filing in the 'United States v. Daugerdas' case (1:09-cr-00581-WHP). The text analyzes the ethical conduct of lawyers from the firm Brune & Richard regarding their knowledge of misconduct by 'juror Conrad' and whether they had a duty to disclose information discovered in March and May 2011. It concludes that the lawyers did not have 'actual knowledge' requiring disclosure under Rules 3.3(b) and 3.5(d).
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.
2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court
A conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor regarding Jane's testimony.
2021-01-01
The document discusses the nature of plea negotiations between a defendant and a prosecutor, specifically whether they can bind other districts.
Date unknown
Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
2011-06-20
Plea negotiations in Commonwealth v. Zuber
1976-01-01 • Pennsylvania
Lenny Bruce's trial (implied by jury mention)
Date unknown • Chicago
Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (Southern District)
Mary brought in front of the grand jury without briefing.
0028-06-01 • Court/Grand Jury Room
Evidentiary hearing regarding the scope of the plea agreement.
Date unknown • District Court
Grand Jury Testimony regarding victim identification charts.
Date unknown • Unknown (Grand Jury Room)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event