Relationship Details

This document is page 34 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a massage she gave to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness states that, contrary to just giving a massage, Epstein also asked her to remove her bra and did touch her. She denies touching Epstein's penis or 'whacking him off,' which she clarifies means masturbating, and is confronted with what appears to be a contradictory prior statement to the police.

This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript, potentially from a U.S. House Oversight investigation. An unnamed witness is questioned about using the racial slur 'Niggaa' in a message, which they state they do not find offensive. The transcript also captures a heated procedural argument between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, over the questioning and the proper identification of an exhibit numbered 31-001.

This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about an incident at Jeff Epstein's house three years prior. The witness confirms they previously told police they did not have sex with Epstein and maintains this denial, while also being questioned about a fifty-million-dollar civil complaint they filed against him.

This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.

This document is a deposition transcript excerpt where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, admits to intentionally lying to Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms they pretended to be 18 when they were not and also lied about which school they attended. The document contains two redactions, likely obscuring the name of the school, and notes an objection from another attorney, Mr. Leopold.

This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.

This document is page 31 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a prior statement she made to a Detective Pagan, in which she allegedly described lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein by saying it "really fast." The witness's attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek, repeatedly object to the line of questioning.

This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.

This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.

This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.