Relationship Details
Connected Entities
Evidence
The document is a transcript of their argument during a deposition, with Mr. Leopold objecting to Mr. Tein's questions.
The transcript documents a heated argument between them regarding legal procedure during a deposition or hearing.
The entire transcript page shows a heated argument with insults and threats to end the deposition.
The entire transcript page shows a heated argument with insults and threats to end the deposition.
Mr. Tein is the questioning attorney, while Mr. Leopold is the objecting attorney for the opposing side in the deposition.
Mr. Tein is the questioning attorney, while Mr. Leopold is the objecting attorney for the opposing side in the deposition.
Mr. Tein is the questioning attorney, while Mr. Leopold is the objecting attorney for the opposing side in the deposition.
Mr. Tein is the questioning attorney, while Mr. Leopold is the objecting attorney for the opposing side in the deposition.
Mr. Tein is the questioning attorney, while Mr. Leopold is the objecting attorney for the opposing side in the deposition.
Their exchange on lines 1-6 shows a contentious interaction typical of opposing counsel in a deposition.
Exchange where Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold's behavior 'obnoxious' and 'stupid'.
Exchange where Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold's behavior 'obnoxious' and 'stupid'.
The two attorneys engage in a heated exchange where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of coaching the witness, and they argue over speaking and making a record.
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Direct and confrontational dialogue: 'I'm not speaking to you.' 'Okay. Then don't speak to me then.'
Exchange where Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold's behavior 'obnoxious' and 'stupid'.
Exchange where Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold's behavior 'obnoxious' and 'stupid'.
Exchange where Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold's behavior 'obnoxious' and 'stupid'.
MR. LEOPOLD objects to MR. TEIN's questions, and MR. TEIN accuses MR. LEOPOLD of coaching the witness.
MR. TEIN questions the witness represented by MR. LEOPOLD and tells him 'Don't coach'.
MR. TEIN questions the witness represented by MR. LEOPOLD and tells him 'Don't coach'.
The two attorneys engage in a heated exchange where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of coaching the witness, and they argue over speaking and making a record.
The two attorneys engage in a heated exchange where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of coaching the witness, and they argue over speaking and making a record.
Source Documents (7)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012428.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition dated September 29, 2010. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over a question Mr. Tein posed to an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of asking an improper and unethical question intended to make the witness, who claimed not to remember something, appear to be lying.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012468.jpg
This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012405.jpg
This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a redacted deponent, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, about their awareness of a lawsuit filed on their behalf by lawyer Jeffrey Herman. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing attorney-client privilege, leading to a dispute over the validity of the privilege claim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012448.jpg
This document is a page from a contentious legal deposition transcript. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about an incident where they allegedly evaded process servers with the help of a manager named Justin. The witness confirms that Justin lied for them by stating they were not present.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012417.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, likely dated September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about whether they were induced by anyone to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money, which the witness denies. The transcript captures a contentious exchange between Mr. Tein and the witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, whom Mr. Tein repeatedly accuses of coaching the witness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012462.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from approximately September 29, 2004, identified by a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a person named Steven. The witness states she visited Steven's apartment once 'this past weekend' but does not know the address and that they 'no longer speak'.
Mutual Connections
Entities connected to both MR. TEIN and MR. LEOPOLD
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship