Bobbi C. Sternheim is listed as 'Attorney for Defendant'.
Bobbi C. Sternheim is listed as 'Attorney for Defendant'.
Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a letter on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating she is part of her legal counsel.
Bobbi C. Sternheim is listed as an 'Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell'.
Document is filed by Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Bobbi C. Sternheim
Listed under 'Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell'
Document header and context of defense arguments.
Filing letters on behalf of Maxwell as defense counsel.
Letterhead matches defense arguments for 'Ms. Maxwell'.
Listed as Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
Listed as Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
Sternheim filed motions and submissions on behalf of Maxwell.
Sternheim is listed as defense counsel submitting letters on behalf of Maxwell.
Letterhead and context of submission on Maxwell's behalf.
Payment made by Sternheim FBO (For Benefit Of) Maxwell
Sternheim writes on behalf of the defense in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Listed under 'Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell'
Attorney receiving notice for the case
Sternheim is listed on the electronic mail notice list for Maxwell's case.
Sternheim is filing documents in U.S. v. Maxwell
Sternheim is sending urgent emails regarding Maxwell from her law office.
Sternheim is sending emails regarding Maxwell's case/BOP number.
Sternheim is listed as a recipient of notices regarding Maxwell's case
Sternheim listed as recipient of notice in Maxwell's case.
Sternheim sending urgent legal orders on behalf of Maxwell.
Bobbi C. Sternheim is listed as a recipient of the Notice of Appearance for Additional Counsel in Maxwell's case.
Sternheim is filing documents regarding Maxwell's detention conditions in US v. Maxwell.
Filing letters on behalf of defense in U.S. v. Maxwell
Sternheim is receiving docket notices for Maxwell's case.
Sternheim is filing documents in U.S. v. Maxwell case.
Sternheim is listed on the notification list for Maxwell's case, typically indicating defense counsel.
Listed as Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell
Document filed by Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding Ms. Maxwell's sentencing.
Sternheim is listed as Defendant's Counsel for Maxwell in the appeal.
EFTA00022454.pdf
An email dated May 7, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email provides a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00021729.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated January 15, 2021, communicating a court order to an unidentified recipient (likely prison officials). The email contains the text of a Memo Endorsement signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which orders the Bureau of Prisons to grant Ghislaine Maxwell access to her laptop on weekends and holidays for reviewing discovery materials.
EFTA00025177.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated April 27, 2021, among staff at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), celebrating a court victory in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 21-58). The emails forward a Notice of Docket Activity from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals indicating that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail was denied. The staff congratulate a redacted colleague for doing a 'kickass job with this appeal.'
EFTA00028701.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 2, 2021. It forwards an automated Notice of Docket Activity from the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals indicating that Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail was denied. A USANYS staff member comments 'Awesome work!' regarding the court's decision.
EFTA00017817.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 20, 2020, between Bobbi C. Sternheim (defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell) and an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim sent an urgent request for a call regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The AUSA replied indicating they had missed a call and provided windows of availability.
EFTA00020425.pdf
This document is an automated Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated March 29, 2021. It notifies recipients, including attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and the firm Cohen Gresser, that a new case (21-770) has been filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in relation to case 21-58 (United States of America v. Maxwell).
EFTA00020972.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated January 26, 2021. It confirms the filing of a 'Notice of Appearance for Additional or Substitute Counsel' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Case Number 21-58) on January 25, 2021. The notice lists attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim as a recipient.
EFTA00022023.pdf
This document is an email dated June 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The subject concerns 'US v. Maxwell' and an update on conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The email attaches a letter with requested redactions highlighted regarding these conditions.
EFTA00027563.pdf
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated April 15, 2021. It notifies recipients of a filing in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Case No. 21-58). The filing is a Certificate of Service related to a motion by an unnamed appellate counsel to withdraw/be relieved from representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00010599.jpg
This is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 672) from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 24, 2022. The defense argues that the upcoming sentencing proceeding should not be an 'open-mike forum' and contends that individuals who do not strictly qualify as 'crime victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should be barred from giving oral testimony or having their statements read. The filing asserts that allowing non-statutory victims to speak would trample Maxwell's rights and suggests some individuals may be motivated by financial reward or media attention.
EFTA00015898.pdf
This document is an email metadata printout dated December 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The email is copied to other defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark S. Cohen) and a representative from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line references Ghislaine Maxwell and her Bureau of Prisons register number (02879-509).
EFTA00015723.pdf
This document is a Notice of Docket Activity from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding the case United States v. Maxwell (Case No. 21-770), dated April 5, 2021. It notifies attorneys of record, including David Oscar Markus and Bobbi C. Sternheim, that a 'Defective Document' (Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance) was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes standard PACER warnings and technical metadata regarding the file transaction.
EFTA00031202.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, among US Attorney's Office (USANYS) staff coordinating a response to a letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim. The emails reveal urgent internal coordination to meet a 5 PM deadline set by Judge Nathan, discussions about reviewing the draft with the MDC/BOP, and strategic decisions regarding how to address specific points raised by the defense, specifically regarding legal mail and the volume of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on June 24, 2022. In the letter, Maxwell formally objects to Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant being legally characterized as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) for the purpose of sentencing. The defense argues these individuals do not meet the statutory requirements, specifically regarding their age at the time of alleged abuse, the timing relative to the indictment, and proximate harm resulting from the specific federal offenses of conviction.
EFTA00026464.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00026477.pdf
This document is an email notification from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit regarding case 21-58, United States of America v. Maxwell. Dated January 26, 2021, it notifies recipients that an attorney (name redacted) has been added for the Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice was mailed to Assistant U.S. Attorney Christian Romeyn Everdell and Ms. Bobbi C. Sternheim, among others.
DOJ-OGR-00002221.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 15 of 15) of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated December 18, 2020, and filed on December 23, 2020. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their contact information.
22-1426_Documents.pdf
This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020588.jpg
A receipt from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, dated July 7, 2022. It documents a payment of $505.00 made by Bobbi C. Sternheim via credit card for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' on behalf of (FBO) Ghislaine Maxwell regarding case 20CR330-1 AJN.
DOJ-OGR-00020720.jpg
This court docket page from the SDNY details proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between April and June 2022. Key entries include an April 29 opinion where Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion for acquittal but granted a motion regarding 'multiplicity,' resulting in convictions being consolidated into Counts Three, Four, and Six. The document explicitly links Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein as a 'continuous coconspirator' in grooming and abusing underage girls. It also documents scheduling for her sentencing on June 28, 2022, at the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00020474.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 detailing procedural filings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the submission and deadline protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Submissions from both the defense (Bobbi Sternheim) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, et al.) are logged, primarily concerning victim notifications and objections to statements.
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 21, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim explains that attached documents concerning a Motion for a New Trial contain proposed redactions to protect the integrity of an inquiry into 'Juror 50's conduct' and to protect the privacy of other jurors involved in the voir dire process.
DOJ-OGR-00001390.jpg
This page is from a legal motion filed by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (specifically Bobbi C. Sternheim's office) on April 19, 2021. The defense argues that the government's opposition to a trial continuance is unreasonable because the prosecution has significantly expanded the case, including increasing the conspiracy timeline from 4 to 11 years and adding new charges related to 'Accuser-4'. The document highlights a massive discovery dump on April 13, 2021, involving 20,000 pages of documents related to 226 non-testifying witnesses, which the defense claims they need more time to review before the scheduled July 12 trial.
DOJ-OGR-00002410.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to dismiss counts five and six of the superseding indictment. The grounds for dismissal are that the alleged misstatements are not perjurious as a matter of law.
DOJ-OGR-00019729.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing filings between November 6, 2020, and December 1, 2020, related to the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit, orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan extending discovery deadlines, and specific orders regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, including a directive involving Warden Heriberto Tellez. The document lists correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Sternheim) regarding discovery materials and detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001393.jpg
A legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing for a continuance of Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. The defense cites the difficulties of preparing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to investigate new charges and 'quarter-century-old allegations,' and the review of voluminous discovery produced in November 2020. The document criticizes the government's timeline estimates and their opposition to the delay.
DOJ-OGR-00020015.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail and lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00002207(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum' filed on December 23, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing is in support of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. It lists her legal defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00020699.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00010447.jpg
This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.
DOJ-OGR-00020118.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 11 of the document, marked as page 10 of 15 in the filing header) of a legal submission dated December 18, 2020, for Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, comprising attorneys from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
DOJ-OGR-00020312.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 19, 2021. The defense is requesting a 90-day continuance (delay) of the trial scheduled for July 12, 2021, citing a recent government disclosure regarding 226 witnesses and scheduling conflicts. The document highlights the defense's need for time to investigate exculpatory information and complains about the government's unilateral expansion of the prosecution.
Entities connected to both Bobbi C. Sternheim and GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship