Relationship Details

This document is page 65 of a legal transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about the identity of a woman they were in a car with. The witness claims not to know the woman's name but had previously described her as "dark like a Spanish girl." Mr. Tein accuses the witness of lying to the police about the woman's identity, which the witness denies.

This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unnamed witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned about their connection to an apartment and their knowledge of a criminal case. The questioning reveals that Mr. Leopold recently filed a $50 million lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein in federal court, prompting an objection from the lawyer.

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition (page 45), where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed female witness about evidence she provided and her connection to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms giving her cell phone to a 'Michelle Pagan' 3-4 years prior. When asked how much money she hopes to get from Mr. Epstein, her lawyer, Mr. Leopold, objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs her not to answer.

This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where an unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of matters related to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies meeting several named agents, including FBI agent Nesbit Kirkendall, and denies ever discussing being reimbursed by Epstein. They also deny any knowledge of an alleged promise by the government to provide money to girls at the end of a criminal prosecution.

This document is page 69 of a deposition transcript, likely dated September 29, 2004. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who denies knowing an individual named Tony, even when presented with details of his alleged criminal past. The witness also denies remembering making a statement to a Detective Pagan but confirms they have read the police reports online and were surprised by their release.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies that Epstein or his staff ever harmed their father or his property, and is then questioned about a potentially false statement made to police regarding a trip with a person named Hayley to Epstein's house.

This document is page 29 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over questioning procedure before Mr. Tein asks the witness about a conversation she had with a woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing lack of foundation and predicate.

This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.

This document is page 77 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. An unidentified witness states that they were prepared for the deposition by Mr. Leopold that same morning. The witness also confirms reading their prior statement to the police, clarifying it was a narrative-style police report, which they reviewed a few days before the deposition.

This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, possibly related to a U.S. House Oversight investigation. A witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a press conference held by their father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman regarding the witness's lawsuit. The deposition becomes contentious as the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects and threatens to leave, prompting a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger.

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The focus is on a prior tape-recorded statement the witness allegedly gave to police 'three years ago', accusing Jeffrey Epstein of attempting to murder her father by tampering with his car tires. The witness denies making such a statement, while the attorney confronts her with a direct quote from her alleged police report.

This document is a transcript from a legal deposition, page 18 of a larger volume. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a message they sent to a friend, in which they described the deposition as "stupid court s-h-i-t." The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as having been 'asked and answered'.

This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.

This document is page 11 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about their awareness of a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein by attorney Jeffrey Herman. The deponent's counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects but the deponent ultimately confirms their awareness of the lawsuit.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness denies knowing individuals named Marie Villafona and Jeffrey Sloman but confirms that they know someone named Jeffrey Herman. The questioning also covers a visit by 'two ladies and two guys' to the witness's house and whether any cell phone communication occurred.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.

This document is a transcript from page 58 of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about lying about their age. The witness denies lying to buy beer or on their MySpace pages in general but admits to lying about being 18 in reference to 'Exhibit 26-01' and denies lying about being 19 in reference to 'Exhibit 33'. Other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, are also present and interject.

This document is page 41 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is questioned about their lawyer, Mr. Herman. The witness clarifies that their father, not them, selected Mr. Herman, and they met him once at a friend's house with their aunt present. An attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to further questions about the meeting, successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.

This document is a deposition transcript from approximately September 29, 2004, identified by a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a person named Steven. The witness states she visited Steven's apartment once 'this past weekend' but does not know the address and that they 'no longer speak'.

This document is a page from a legal transcript, page 44, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about receiving reimbursement for damages and a victim notification letter. The witness denies receiving either and states they no longer live at the relevant residence. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about her first meeting with Jeff Epstein. The witness confirms Epstein asked her age 'upstairs' during a massage, not upon initial introduction, and denies having spoken to Epstein's assistant who escorted her.

This document is a page from a deposition transcript showing a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Mr. Leopold is objecting to the line of questioning, arguing for professionalism and accusing Mr. Tein of harassing the witness. Mr. Tein urges Mr. Leopold to conclude his objection so that he can continue asking questions.

This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.