Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case 09-CV-80802
Listed as Plaintiff and Defendant in Case No. 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case No. 09-CV-80802
Defendant and Plaintiff in Case 09-CV-80802
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80802
Plaintiff vs Defendant lawsuit
006-01.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated July 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a deadline of July 14, 2009, for the defendant to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.
004.pdf
Legal document filed on June 5, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida court case 'Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The document is a Notice of Appearance indicating that attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike of the law firm Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP are entering the case to represent the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The service list includes contact information for other attorneys involved, including Jack Alan Goldberger (also for Epstein) and Adam D. Horowitz (for the Plaintiff).
032.pdf
This is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 25, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe No. 8 against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of that settlement.
031-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 09-CV-80802-MARRA-JOHNSON). Judge Kenneth A. Marra ordered the case between Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 8 and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein dismissed following a settlement stipulation between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
011-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on August 11, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the existing case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes only.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on July 7, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Epstein's attorneys requested a one-week extension (until July 14, 2009) to respond to a complaint filed by 'Jane Doe No. 8' on May 28, 2009, citing workload from other cases involving Epstein. The motion notes that opposing counsel agreed to this extension.
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Jane Doe No. 8
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship