037.pdf

2.3 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
6
Events
6
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / motion to compel
File Size: 2.3 MB
Summary

This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, representing Plaintiff Teresa Helm, to Judge Debra Freeman, requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Epstein's lawyer and accountant) to produce discovery documents and respond to interrogatories. The letter details Defendants' failure to comply with discovery obligations, including not producing any documents and improperly limiting the relevant time period for discovery, despite allegations that Jeffrey Epstein operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in 2002.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Sigrid S. McCawley Attorney
Author of the letter, representing Teresa Helm
Debra Freeman Honorable Judge
Recipient of the letter
Teresa Helm Plaintiff
The case plaintiff, alleging sex trafficking and assault by Jeffrey Epstein
Darren K. Indyke Defendant / Epstein's longtime lawyer
Defendant in the case, also described as Epstein's longtime lawyer and co-conspirator
Richard D. Kahn Defendant / Epstein's longtime accountant
Defendant in the case, also described as Epstein's longtime accountant
Jeffrey Epstein Perpetrator
Alleged operator of a sex-trafficking scheme, accused of sexually assaulting Teresa Helm
B. Moskowitz Attorney
Sent a letter to S. McCawley on Feb 3, 2020, representing Defendants
Ghislaine Maxwell Associate of Epstein
Mentioned in public records as having received help from Indyke
Leslie Wexner Associate of Epstein
Mentioned in public records as having properties over which Indyke held power of attorney
Lesley Croff Executive Assistant
Employed by Indyke's law practice

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
Law firm representing Teresa Helm
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
Location where the letter is sent
Yahoo Finance
Source of public record information about Epstein's lawyers

Timeline (6 events)

2002
Epstein sexually assaulted Teresa Helm during a massage in New York.
New York
2019-07-08
Jeffrey Epstein's arrest date.
2019-11-12
Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
2020-01-23
Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures.
2020-03-10
Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants.
2020-04-16
Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests.

Locations (3)

Location Context
Address of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Location of Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, where Teresa Helm was sexually assaulted
Origin of Teresa Helm for trafficking

Relationships (6)

Teresa Helm victim-perpetrator Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff alleges that Jeffrey Epstein ... sexually assaulted her during a massage in New York.
Darren K. Indyke longtime lawyer/co-conspirator Jeffrey Epstein
Darren Indyke—Epstein’s longtime lawyer who has ties to Epstein’s co-conspirators
Richard D. Kahn longtime accountant Jeffrey Epstein
Richard Kahn—Epstein’s longtime accountant who assisted him for years with both personal and professional accounting work
Indyke for example, helped Ghislaine Maxwell buy her townhouse
Darren K. Indyke power of attorney holder Leslie Wexner
held a power of attorney over one of Leslie Wexner’s properties
Darren K. Indyke employer-employee Lesley Croff
employed Lesley Croff as an executive assistant for his law practice

Key Quotes (3)

"Defendants have improperly objected to the Relevant Period that Plaintiff defined in her discovery requests as January 1, 2002 to the present. Without providing any legal basis for their position, Defendants contend that the relevant time period should be limited to the year of Plaintiff’s sexual assault as alleged in the Complaint."
Source
037.pdf
Quote #1
"Defendants have refused, without providing any legal basis for doing so, to produce any document that does not directly reference Plaintiff, regardless of the year."
Source
037.pdf
Quote #2
"This is despite the fact that Defendant Kahn was Epstein’s longtime accountant and likely knows who was on Epstein’s payroll. This total failure to answer even basic questions about the location of documents and potential witnesses is egregious."
Source
037.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document