DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
1.01 MB
Extraction Summary
11
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal report / case file document
File Size:
1.01 MB
Summary
This page from an OPR report discusses the handling of the Epstein case, concluding that prosecutors did not intend to benefit Epstein but that the outcome resulted from Acosta's concerns about state authority. It highlights communication failures within the team, noting that while Acosta was unusually involved in decision-making, he was removed from the supervisory chain and may not have been fully aware of critical details known by staff members like Villafaña.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | ||
| U.S. Attorney | ||
| CEOS | ||
| State Attorney | ||
| DOJ |
Timeline (4 events)
prosecution memorandum drafting
negotiations
NPA resolution
state indictment
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"OPR did not find evidence to support allegations that the prosecutors sought to benefit Epstein at the expense of the victims."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
Quote #1
"Acosta was involved to a greater extent and made more decisions than he did in a typical case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
Quote #2
"management of the case suffered from both an absence of ownership of the investigation and failures in communication that affected critical decisions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document