HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg

2.4 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
14
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal opinion / court order (federal supplement excerpt)
File Size: 2.4 MB
Summary

This document is page 803 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York (2005) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details the Federal Plaintiffs' allegations that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia aided terrorists through various charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and the Kingdom's defense based on sovereign immunity and findings from the 9/11 Commission Report stating no evidence was found of Saudi institutional funding. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Osama bin Laden Terrorist Leader
Mentioned regarding his public targeting of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Prince Sultan Saudi Royal/Defendant
Mentioned in relation to a Motion to Dismiss.
Prince Turki Saudi Royal/Declarant
Cited in declaration regarding cooperation with the US (Prince Turki Decl. ¶¶ 7, 8, 10).
Steven Emerson Witness/Expert
Provided Senate Subcommittee Testimony on July 31, 2003.
Jonathan Levin Witness/Expert
Provided Senate Subcommittee Testimony on July 31, 2003.

Organizations (14)

Name Type Context
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Defending against claims of aiding terrorists through charities; arguing sovereign immunity.
Council on Foreign Relations
Sponsored an Independent Task Force on Terrorist Financing.
CNN.com
Cited as a source for a report on Saudis reforming charities.
U.S. State Department
Noted as not having designated the Kingdom a state sponsor of terrorism.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
Also known as the 9/11 Commission; cited for its report.
MWL
Muslim World League; alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
IIRO
International Islamic Relief Organization; alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
WAMY
World Assembly of Muslim Youth; alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
Al Haramain Islamic Foundation
Alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
Saudi High Commission for Relief to Bosnia and Herzegovina
Alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
SJRC
Alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
Rabita Trust
Alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
Saudi Red Crescent
Alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.
BIF
Benevolence International Foundation; alleged instrumentality of the Kingdom.

Timeline (2 events)

July 31, 2003
Senate Subcommittee Testimony
Senate
September 11, 2001
Terrorist attacks
United States
Terrorists Victims

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of attacks; jurisdiction of the court.
Defendant nation.
Location associated with the Saudi High Commission for Relief.

Relationships (2)

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Alleged Control/Funding MWL, IIRO, WAMY, Al Haramain, etc.
Plaintiffs allege these charities are 'agencies, instrumentalities, arms or organs of the Kingdom.' Kingdom disputes this.
Kingdom argues Plaintiffs ignore bin Laden's 'public targeting of the Kingdom.'

Key Quotes (4)

"[W]e have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
Quote #1
"The U.S. State Department has not designated the Kingdom a state sponsor of terrorism."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court finds the Plaintiffs' allegations cannot overcome the discretionary function exception to the tortious acts exception."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
Quote #3
"Rather than pleading specific facts showing that the Kingdom caused Plaintiffs' injuries, the Federal Plaintiffs focus predominantly on the charities' actions."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017868.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document