EFTA00014185.pdf

121 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order (order denying motion to seal)
File Size: 121 KB
Summary

Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida) dated August 4, 2008, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a reply brief under seal in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that the public interest in access to court records outweighed the U.S. Attorney's objections and the confidentiality clause in Epstein's agreement with the government, ordering the Clerk to unseal relevant docket entries.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of the court order denying his motion to file documents under seal.
Jane Doe No. 2 Plaintiff
Plaintiff in the civil case against Epstein.
Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
Judge who signed the order.
Johnson Magistrate Judge
Implied by case number suffix (CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
The court handling the case.
U.S. Attorney
Cited regarding a confidentiality agreement with the Defendant.
Clerk's Office
Administrative office where documents must be filed.

Timeline (2 events)

2008-07-28
Defendant filed Motion to File Under Seal.
Southern District of Florida
2008-08-04
Order Denying Motion to Seal signed by Judge Marra.
West Palm Beach, Florida

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the Court and Clerk's Office.
County where the order was signed.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Agreement U.S. Attorney
Document mentions an agreement between Defendant and the U.S. Attorney containing a confidentiality clause.
Jane Doe No. 2 Adversarial Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff vs Defendant in Case NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON

Key Quotes (4)

"proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record."
Source
EFTA00014185.pdf
Quote #1
"The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal."
Source
EFTA00014185.pdf
Quote #2
"Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED."
Source
EFTA00014185.pdf
Quote #3
"Defendant states that he seeks to file this document under seal 'to comply with the confidentiality clause' in the agreement between Defendant and the U.S. Attorney"
Source
EFTA00014185.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document