DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg

858 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

13
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Doj/ogr report (office of professional responsibility/office of general counsel)
File Size: 858 KB
Summary

This document details the tense negotiations between the USAO (Acosta) and Epstein's defense team (Starr, Lefkowitz, Dershowitz) in December 2007. Following defense submissions, the USAO initiated a de novo review of evidence by Criminal Chief Robert Senior and held a meeting in Miami on December 14, 2007, where the defense argued state charges did not apply. The defense subsequently threatened to seek review from DOJ Washington (AAG Fisher), prompting Acosta to request an expedited review to preserve a scheduled January 4th plea date.

People (13)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of the investigation and plea negotiations
Jay Lefkowitz Defense Attorney
Representing Epstein; communicated with Acosta regarding the NPA and potential Washington review
Ken Starr Defense Attorney
Representing Epstein; attended Dec 14 meeting; corresponded with Acosta and Fisher
Alexander Acosta US Attorney (USAO)
Lead prosecutor negotiating with defense; agreed to meetings and review
Sloman USAO Official
Asked Robert Senior to review evidence de novo
Villafaña USAO Official
Instructed to provide investigative materials to Senior
Robert Senior Chief of USAO Criminal Division
Succeeded Menchel; tasked with de novo review of evidence
Menchel Former Chief of USAO Criminal Division
Predecessor to Robert Senior
Alan Dershowitz Defense Attorney
Part of Epstein's defense team at Dec 14 meeting
Gerald Lefcourt Defense Attorney
Part of Epstein's defense team at Dec 14 meeting
Martin Weinberg Defense Attorney
Boston attorney; part of Epstein's defense team at Dec 14 meeting
Fisher Assistant Attorney General
DOJ official in Washington; point of contact for potential appeal/review
Lourie Chief of Staff to AAG Fisher
Communicated with Starr regarding resolving issues with Acosta

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
USAO
US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida)
Kirkland & Ellis
Law firm (Lefkowitz's firm)
FBI
Investigative agency; Miami Special Agent in Charge present at meeting
Department of Justice
Referenced as 'Washington' for review purposes

Timeline (2 events)

December 14, 2007
Meeting between Epstein's defense team and USAO officials
Miami
Starr Dershowitz Lefcourt Weinberg Acosta Sloman Villafaña FBI SAC FBI ASAC
January 4
Planned plea date mentioned as a deadline to preserve
Unknown
Epstein

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the December 14, 2007 meeting
Location for potential Departmental review (DOJ headquarters)

Relationships (3)

Robert Senior Professional Succession Menchel
Robert Senior, who had succeeded Menchel as Chief of the USAO’s Criminal Division
Acosta Governmental/Hierarchical Fisher
Acosta notified Assistant Attorney General Fisher... asked her to grant such a request for review
Starr Co-Counsel Lefkowitz
Starr and Lefkowitz then sent to Acosta a lengthy letter

Key Quotes (5)

"Epstein 'unconditionally re-asserts his intention to fulfill and not seek to withdraw from or unwind' the NPA."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
Quote #1
"the defense team may 'have no alternative but to seek review in Washington.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
Quote #2
"to in fact review this case in an expedited manner [in order] to preserve the January 4th plea date."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein sought a 'prompt, independent, expedited review' of the evidence by 'you or someone you trust.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
Quote #4
"it was 'improper' to require Epstein to pay damages 'to individuals who do nothing but simply assert a claim' under the statute."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document