HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
4.03 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
20
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Federal register publication
File Size:
4.03 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments on a proposed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. It outlines the divided feedback, with unions and employee advocates praising the notice for its clarity, while employer groups and conservative organizations criticized it as unbalanced, pro-union, and an oversimplification of complex labor law. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is solely focused on U.S. labor regulations.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Fusco | Labor and employment attorney |
Submitted a comment supporting the proposed NLRB notice, stating it 'contains an accurate, understandable and balance...
|
| General Counsel of the NLRB | General Counsel |
Quoted from the Foreword to the 'Basic Guide to the NLRA' about the difficulty of stating labor law principles in a s...
|
Organizations (20)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) | ||
| National Immigration Law Center | ||
| Service Employees International Union | ||
| Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld | ||
| United Transportation Union | ||
| Pilchak, Cohen & Tice | ||
| American Trucking Association | ||
| Electrical and Mechanical Systems Inc. | ||
| The Heritage Foundation | ||
| National Right to Work Committee | ||
| COLLE | ||
| Retail Industry Leaders Association | ||
| Chamber of Commerce | ||
| Fisher & Phillips LLP | ||
| Ishikawa Gasket America, Inc. | ||
| Capital Associated Industries, Inc. | ||
| National Association of Manufacturers | ||
| Coalition for a Democratic Workplace | ||
| U.S. Supreme Court | ||
| U.S. House Oversight Committee |
Timeline (1 events)
Circa 2011
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposed a new rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and solicited public comments. This document analyzes the substance of those comments.
United States
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
General Public
Employers
Unions
Interest Groups
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of rights that some commentators argued were excluded from the proposed notice, specifically...
|
Relationships (1)
Employer/Industry Groups
→
Adversarial
→
Unions/Employee Rights Groups
The document details the opposing viewpoints submitted as comments to the NLRB. Employer groups (like the Chamber of Commerce, Heritage Foundation) argued the proposed notice was unbalanced and pro-unionization, while unions (like the United Transportation Union, SEIU) supported it for its clarity and educational value for workers.
Key Quotes (6)
"contains an accurate, understandable and balanced presentation of rights."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #1
"notice presents an understandable, concise and extremely informative recitation of workers’ rights, without getting bogged down in extraneous language, incomprehensible legalese or innumerable caveats and exceptions."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #2
"NLRB’s Basic Guide to the National Labor Relations Act: General Principles of Law Under the Statute and Procedures of the National Labor Relations Board"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #3
"[a]ny effort to state basic principles of law in a simple way is a challenging and unenviable task. This is especially true about labor law, a relatively complex field of law."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #4
"short and plain"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #5
"clearly and effectively inform employees of their rights under the Act"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document