United States
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bryan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
George
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Giffen
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Libby
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lloyd
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maniktala
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marshall
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
McGuinness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paxson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Poindexter
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Safavian
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Katz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Tellier
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wicker
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Walker
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Walsh
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Washington
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Watson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wedd
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Weiner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Werner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wey
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Winter
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wong
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-16 | N/A | Deadline for United States to submit amicus letter brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's arguments ... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-08-17 | Legal decision | Decision in the case of United States v. Kozel. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Discovery | The government produced other discovery materials. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-05 | Discovery | The government produced certain discovery materials. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-07 | Legal event | A superseding indictment was issued. | United States | View |
| 2020-07-06 | Legal filing | The 'Commitment to Another District' document for Ghislaine Maxwell was filed with the U.S. Distr... | DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | View |
| 2020-07-02 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'Commitment to Another District' document for Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing charges an... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Legal case | Decision in the case of United States v. Deutsch. | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Legal case decision | Decision in United States v. Deutsch. | E.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-06-23 | Legal ruling | The Court in United States v. Abdellatif El Mokadem ruled that the defendant should be released p... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-06-23 | Legal case | Decision in the case of United States v. Abdellatif El Mokadem. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-06-23 | Legal case decision | Decision in United States v. Abdellatif El Mokadem. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-05-19 | Legal ruling | Ruling in the case of United States v. Ortiz. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-13 | Legal ruling | Ruling by Judge Gardephe in the case of United States v. Paulino, denying a bail application. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-10 | Legal ruling | Ruling by Judge Ramos in the case of United States v. Nunez. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-07 | Court decision | A court in S.D.N.Y. ruled in United States v. Eley that the defendant's request for release was n... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-07 | Legal proceeding | Decision in the case of United States v. Belardo. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-04-02 | Legal decision | The case of United States v. Boatwright was decided. | D. Nev. | View |
| 2020-03-31 | Legal case | Decision in the case of United States v. Chandler. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-03-31 | Legal ruling | The ruling in United States v. Chandler, which found that the coronavirus pandemic constituted a ... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-03-31 | Legal case decision | Decision in United States v. Chandler. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-02-25 | Court proceeding | A court transcript from the case United States v. Randall is cited. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal case | Citation for United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Decision in the case of United States v. Scarborough. | 6th Cir. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Savage, 970 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 2020) | 3d Cir. | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017853.jpg
This document is page 788 from a legal opinion in the Federal Supplement (349 F.Supp.2d) discussing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It addresses whether immunity extends to Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia for actions taken in their official capacities. The text references a complaint filed on September 10, 2003, where plaintiffs argued Prince Turki was not entitled to immunity because he was serving as the Ambassador to the UK at the time. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017851.jpg
This document is page 786 from a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely *In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001*) bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details allegations by plaintiffs that Prince Turki (Head of Saudi Intelligence) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia provided financial and logistical support to al Qaeda and the Taliban, including facilitating money transfers and supporting charities linked to terrorism. The text also outlines Prince Turki's defense, where he denies these claims, citing his official role in attempting to extradite Osama bin Laden and Saudi Arabia's severance of ties with the Taliban in 1998. NOTE: While the prompt mentions Epstein, this specific page deals exclusively with 9/11 litigation and does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017849.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) detailing civil litigation related to the 9/11 attacks (specifically the 'Burnett' and 'Ashton' complaints). It outlines allegations against Saudi Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, claiming he funded Islamic charities (IIRO, Al Haramain, MWL, WAMY) that served as fronts for Al Qaeda. The text details a 1990 meeting between Prince Sultan, Prince Turki, and Osama bin Laden, and notes $6 million in personal contributions from Sultan to these organizations since 1994.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017847.jpg
This document is page 782 from a court opinion discussing subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It outlines the legal standards for immunity of foreign states, citing precedents like *Saudi Arabia v. Nelson* and *Virtual Countries v. Republic of South Africa*, and details the burden of proof required for plaintiffs to challenge a foreign state's immunity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017843.jpg
This document is a page from a legal reporter (349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series) containing headnotes (summaries of legal points) 96 through 102. The text details legal rulings regarding the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) and civil lawsuits filed by survivors of the September 11, 2001, attacks against various financial institutions and companies in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp (indicating it is part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to Deutsche Bank/Epstein financial probes), the text itself strictly concerns 9/11 litigation, sovereign immunity, and jurisdictional discovery regarding terrorist financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017840.jpg
This document is page 775 from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765), containing legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' The text outlines legal standards regarding jurisdiction, the Antiterrorism Act, conspiracy, international law regarding hijacking, and RICO liability for defendants accused of funding or supporting the 9/11 attacks. It contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017839.jpg
This document is page 774 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series, containing legal headnotes (61-67) regarding the Antiterrorism Act (ATA) litigation following the September 11, 2001 attacks. The text details court rulings on personal jurisdiction over Saudi Arabian princes, banks, and individuals alleged to be on the 'Golden Chain' donor list for al Qaeda. While found in a House Oversight Committee file (likely related to investigations into financial institutions used by Epstein), the text itself focuses strictly on 9/11-related jurisdictional case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017838.jpg
This document is a page from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765) concerning the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', dated 2005. It outlines legal headnotes (53-60) regarding the court's decision that allegations against a Saudi Arabian Prince and the Saudi Royal Family—concerning business ties via Saudi Arabia Airlines and charitable donations allegedly funding terrorism—were insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction in the United States. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017837.jpg
This document is page 772 from Volume 349 of the Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It contains legal headnotes (numbered 44-52) summarizing points of law regarding Constitutional Law, Federal Courts, and Personal Jurisdiction. Specifically, Headnote 45 references litigation involving 'Saudi Arabian Princes' and their alleged involvement with 'al Qaeda' concerning the September 11, 2001 attacks, discussing whether the court has personal jurisdiction over them under the Antiterrorism Act. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a production for a Congressional investigation, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017832.jpg
This document is a page of legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765), dated 2005. It outlines legal standards regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), jurisdiction, and the immunity of foreign officials, specifically mentioning the Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production, potentially related to investigations into 9/11 or financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017831.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Supplement (349 F. Supp. 2d 766) summarizing legal holdings by Judge Casey regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The page outlines 17 specific holdings concerning jurisdiction, sovereign immunity (FSIA), and liability regarding claims brought by survivors and insurance carriers against Saudi Arabia, Saudi Princes, banks, and charities alleged to have supported Al Qaeda. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, though the content specifically concerns 9/11 litigation rather than Jeffrey Epstein directly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017830.jpg
This document is page 765 of a Federal District Court opinion (S.D.N.Y.) dated January 18, 2005, regarding litigation stemming from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001). The text discusses jurisdictional issues concerning a defendant named 'Privatbank' and dismisses claims against individual defendants Horath and Buchmann. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, often associated with investigations into financial institutions (like Deutsche Bank) that may overlap with Epstein investigations, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017806.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit, detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Jean-Luc Brunel regarding the Mc2 modeling agency. It includes testimony from former bookkeeper Maritza Vasquez about the recruitment and housing of underage models, financial transactions, and the pressure placed on models to engage in sexual acts. The text also recounts Virginia Roberts' experience of aging out of Epstein's interest at 19 and being sent to Thailand.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017718.jpg
This document is page 4 of 52 from a production to the House Oversight Committee, stamped with the name David Schoen. The content is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the history of the victims' rights movement, specifically the 1982 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime and subsequent state constitutional amendments (highlighting Arizona). The text analyzes the legal shift towards protecting victims' rights to be present and heard during criminal proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017713.jpg
This document is the final page (78 of 78) of a 2007 Utah Law Review article discussing the legislative landscape of crime victims' rights, specifically mentioning Senator Kyl's bill and the potential need for a Constitutional amendment. It argues that Congress will likely intervene if the Advisory Committee fails to reform the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to protect victims. The document is stamped as a House Oversight exhibit (017713) and lists the name David Schoen at the bottom.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017706.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 71 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that the Advisory Committee's proposed rules improperly limit the venue for asserting victims' rights to cases where prosecution is already underway, potentially failing to protect victims during the investigation phase (pre-charge) when rights to fairness and dignity might be violated by federal agents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of an investigation file, likely regarding the handling of the Epstein case and the non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017670.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 35 of 78), likely authored or submitted by David Schoen, discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17. The text argues against the Advisory Committee's proposed rules for defense subpoenas, claiming they insufficiently protect victims' confidential information and violate the Rules Enabling Act. It cites *United States v. Nixon* to establish the standard for subpoenas (relevancy, admissibility, specificity).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017638.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article titled 'The Crime Victims' Rights Movement.' It details the history of the movement, specifically the 1982 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, which recommended that victims be notified of proceedings and allowed to submit impact statements. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney known for representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was submitted as evidence or research in a congressional inquiry, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017601.jpg
This document appears to be a compilation of notes and correspondence submitted to the House Oversight Committee (stamped 017601). It contains conspiratorial text linking Erik Prince, 9/11 events, and Benghazi to a 'New World Order,' alongside criticism of Obama's Gitmo policy. It includes a transcript of a Facebook message to Dick Cheney about interrogation techniques and a specific email to 'Deputy Lyddy' describing a female subject as exhausted, sleep-deprived, and hungry, followed by commentary on 'reversed-engineered SERE' and the APA's role in torture justification.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017597.jpg
This document contains an email correspondence sent to a reporter at the St. Augustine Record. The writer makes conspiratorial allegations linking a woman named Ms. Simms and the Horton family to a 2007 murder, child exploitation, and terror financing. The email also discusses legal proceedings involving FDLE agent Rusty Rogers and diverges into theories about 9/11, the DHS, and the National Science Foundation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017595.jpg
This document appears to be a composite of excerpts and analysis from a House Oversight production. It extensively quotes Peter Dale Scott's 'The American Deep State' regarding the 9/11 Commission's alleged protection of intelligence connections and the role of Saudi/Qatari royals. The text transitions into a conspiratorial analysis linking 'Clinton's daughter' to terrorism ops and notably mentions a 'Bud Horton' (formerly of Accenture) moving to South Carolina after being implicated in a 'continuing child sex scandal,' suggesting a nexus between intelligence operations, cyber crime, and illicit activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017592.jpg
A document, possibly a witness statement or affidavit submitted to the House Oversight Committee, detailing a conspiracy involving Continuity of Government (COG) protocols and historical hijackings. The author claims that after being labeled a threat while working at SAIC by Steve Colo, they were targeted by the state, leading to the loss of a pregnancy and the alleged capture of children they previously babysat to be used for 'sexual blackmail and other forms of leverage.' The text cuts off mid-sentence at the end.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity