United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DiGiacomo
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Korfant
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Chandler
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Conway
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Kidd
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Raniere
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Khashoggi
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
Midland Asphalt Corp.
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
location
France
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Giglio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Petitioners
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Salameh
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Villa
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Macchia
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Havens
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Vilar
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Georgiou
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Madoff
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Williams
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Young
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Vickers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Pena
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023460.jpg
This document appears to be page 3 of a geopolitical analysis or article regarding tensions in the Middle East, specifically between Saudi Arabia and Iran. It discusses the potential for a nuclear arms race, referencing comments by Prince Turki al Faisal, and contextualizes these tensions within the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq (implying a date of roughly 2011) and the sectarian history between Sunnis and Shiites. The document bears a House Oversight stamp but does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023459.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a news article or geopolitical briefing (possibly from a magazine like Time or Newsweek given the style) discussing the Arab Spring protests around March 2011. It focuses on the proxy conflict ('Cold War') between Saudi Arabia and Iran, specifically highlighting the Saudi military intervention in Bahrain on March 14 to quell protests. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely within a larger cache of materials.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023412.jpg
This document appears to be a page (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023412) from a Westlaw printout of the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It contains footnotes 52 through 74, which cite various intelligence reports (CIA, UN, Interpol) and testimonies (Richard Clarke, Lee Wolosky) regarding Al Qaida, Usama Bin Laden, and terrorist financing. Footnote 70 specifically identifies officials of the Al Rajhi Bank as the 'Al Rajhi Defendants'. While the document is part of a House Oversight collection, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023411.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal citation list related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It lists evidence sources including CIA reports, UN Monitoring Group reports, and U.S. Treasury press releases regarding the designation of various individuals (such as Wa'el Hamza Jelaidan and Yassin al Kadi) and organizations (Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Muwafaq Foundation) connected to Al Qaida financing and terrorism support. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023409.jpg
This document is page 49 of a legal brief or court opinion titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed via Westlaw. It discusses the legal necessity of jurisdictional discovery regarding 'Sovereign Defendants' and 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank), which claims to be an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The text concludes by requesting the reversal of a lower court's dismissal of certain defendants and includes detailed footnotes referencing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the 9/11 Commission Report, and CIA documents concerning Usama Bin Laden and Enaam Arnaout.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (cited as 2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It discusses the dismissal of intentional tort claims (assault, battery, IIED), arguments regarding statutes of limitations in New York versus Virginia and Pennsylvania, and equitable tolling due to the clandestine nature of the conspiracy involving al-Qaeda. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a production by a financial institution or entity being investigated for connections to high-profile cases, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404.jpg
This is a page from a legal document (Westlaw printout, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404) regarding the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It contains legal arguments requesting the court defer decision on TVPA (Torture Victim Protection Act) claims pending a Supreme Court decision, and argues that organizations (not just individuals) should be liable under the TVPA. It also argues that the lower court improperly dismissed negligence and intentional tort claims related to the 9/11 attacks. While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the visible text strictly concerns 9/11 litigation case law and corporate liability, likely included in the House Oversight files as legal precedent or research material.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023403.jpg
This document is page 43 of a legal opinion or brief from 2012 titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal liability of entities under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) for providing material support and financing to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the District Court erred in dismissing claims against banks (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, National Commercial Bank) on the grounds that corporations cannot be sued as individuals under the TVPA, citing various precedents including 'Khulumani' and 'Mohamad v. Rajoub'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023402.jpg
This document is page 42 of a Westlaw printout concerning 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It is a legal text discussing the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), customary international law regarding terrorism, and the Military Commissions Act of 2006. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp (indicating it is part of a Congressional investigation production), the text itself focuses entirely on legal precedents regarding 9/11 and al-Qaeda liability; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023401.jpg
This document is page 41 of a Westlaw printout referencing the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It details international conventions and Security Council resolutions regarding the definition and financing of terrorism. While the text does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, it bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023401', indicating it was included in a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal precedent or an exhibit regarding financial compliance or terrorism financing laws.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399.jpg
This document is page 39 of a legal brief or court opinion (Westlaw) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It discusses the legal liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for defendants who provided financial and material support to al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, specifically noting funding provided in Sudan in the early 1990s. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023399', suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial institutions involved in terrorist financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023395.jpg
This document is page 35 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001', bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It details allegations against Saudi financial institutions, including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and DMI Trust, regarding their financing of Al Qaeda, Hamas, and other terrorist groups through complex networks of charities and investments. The text specifically highlights a $50 million capital injection by Osama bin Laden into Al Shamal Bank and names various Saudi royals and businessmen as knowingly supporting terrorism. While labeled as Epstein-related in the prompt, the text itself focuses exclusively on 9/11 litigation and terror financing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023392.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) related to the 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses the liability of financial institutions, specifically Al Rajhi Bank and Dubai Islamic Bank, for allegedly knowingly providing financial services to Al-Qaeda. The text details how various charities (al Haramain, WAMY, MWL, IIRO, SJRC, BIFs) served as fundraising fronts for Al-Qaeda and links them to specific historical terrorist attacks prior to 9/11. While stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the document text itself focuses exclusively on terrorist financing and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023391.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It details allegations against DMI Trust and its subsidiaries (Faisal Islamic Bank, Faisal Finance, Tadamon Bank) for knowingly facilitating financial support for Al Qaeda, the National Islamic Front in Sudan, and various terrorist operatives including Wa’el Julaidan and Yasin Al Kadi. The text argues that the District Court failed to draw reasonable inferences regarding the defendants' knowledge of their support for terrorism, citing specific financial relationships and public knowledge of Al Qaeda's intent to wage war on the U.S.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023388.jpg
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal printout (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It outlines legal arguments criticizing a district court for ignoring plaintiffs' pleadings against Al Rajhi Bank. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank knowingly provided material support, banking services, and donation management to al-Qaeda and several front charities (IIRO, MWL, WAMY, etc.), as well as providing services to 9/11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023386.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It discusses legal theories of primary and secondary liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for defendants accused of providing material support or financing to al-Qaeda. The document does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein, but bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a larger production of documents to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023385.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (2012 WL 257568). It argues that the District Court improperly dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against several financial defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, for allegedly providing material support to al-Qaeda. The text cites various legal precedents to argue that the ATA should be construed broadly to cut off funding sources to terrorist groups. Although the prompt mentions Epstein, the document text refers strictly to 9/11 litigation, though the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' suggests it may have been part of a broader congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384.jpg
This document appears to be page 24 of a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It discusses the Second Circuit's review of a district court's dismissal of claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Statute (ATS), and Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA). The text critiques the lower court for applying incorrect legal standards regarding 'material support' to al-Qaeda. While the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023384' suggests this was part of a congressional investigation (possibly included in a larger production of documents), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023383.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal filing titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001' obtained from House Oversight records. It details the financial support network of al-Qaeda, specifically focusing on 'The Golden Chain' list of donors, which includes prominent figures such as Khalid bin Mahfouz, Suleiman al Rajhi, and the half-brothers of Osama bin Laden (Bakr, Tariq, Yeslam, and Omar). The text outlines how these individuals allegedly used charities (IIRO, SAAR, Muwafaq) and corporate entities (Saudi Binladin Group) to funnel millions of dollars to al-Qaeda operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023382.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation, specifically detailing the financial infrastructure of al-Qaeda. It describes the interconnections between Osama bin Laden, various financial institutions (Al Shamal, Faisal Islamic Bank, Tadamon, Al Rajhi Bank), and individuals designated as terrorists or sponsors. It notably discusses the discovery of the 'Golden Chain' document in Bosnia, which identified major financial benefactors of al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023380.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, discussing allegations against various individuals and charities (such as Al Haramain and Muwafaq Foundation) for supporting al-Qaeda. It details designations of individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists and outlines how certain financial institutions, particularly Islamic banks, allegedly facilitated the transfer of resources to al-Qaeda.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023379.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) originating from a House Oversight Committee production. It details the interconnectivity between purported Islamic charities (MWL, IIRO, SJRC) and Al-Qaeda leadership, specifically outlining how charity officials appointed known terrorists like Wa'el Jelaidan and Mohammed Jamal Khalifa to positions of power to facilitate funding and logistics for attacks, including the 1993 WTC bombing and the Bojinka plot. While part of a dataset potentially reviewed in Epstein-related investigations (likely regarding foreign financing), the text itself focuses exclusively on Al-Qaeda financing and 9/11 litigation without mentioning Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378.jpg
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378). It details how al-Qaeda utilized a network of ostensible charities, such as the Muslim World League and the International Islamic Relief Organization, to finance operations, launder money, and provide logistical support for terrorism. The text lists specific defendants (Charity Officials) alleged to have knowingly orchestrated this support using their positions within these organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023377.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) detailing the origins of al-Qaeda. It describes how Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam established the organization from the infrastructure of the Afghan jihad, utilizing a financial network known as the 'Golden Chain' comprised of various Islamic charities. The text also outlines specific fatwas issued by Bin Laden between 1992 and 1998 declaring war on the United States. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, the content on this specific page relates entirely to terrorism financing and history, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023375.jpg
This document is a Westlaw printout (dated 2019) bearing a House Oversight Committee bates stamp. It details legal proceedings regarding the 'Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation, specifically summarizing Judge Daniels' 2010 dismissals of numerous defendants (including members of the Bin Laden family, Saudi banks, and other individuals) for lack of personal jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The text focuses on the legal standards for liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act and the requirement to prove specific intent to support the 9/11 attacks.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity