United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
EFTA00014011.pdf
This document is a letter from Gail E. Ferguson, Assistant Ethics Counsel for The Florida Bar, to an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) in the Southern District of Florida, dated November 4, 2008. The letter denies a request for an advisory ethics opinion regarding whether the AUSA violated solicitation rules by contacting victims to offer free legal services as required by statute and court order, stating that the Bar cannot opine on past conduct or legal questions. Ferguson discusses relevant rules regarding solicitation (Rule 4-7.4), communication with represented persons (Rule 4-4.2), and compliance with court orders (Rule 4-3.4).
EFTA00013858.pdf
A letter dated September 1, 2009, from attorney Roy Black to Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Black informs Sloman that Epstein has completed his incarceration, is serving one year of community control, and is applying to transfer his supervision from Florida to the Virgin Islands (his primary residence) via the ICAOS process. Black emphasizes compliance with the non-prosecution agreement and notes the transfer is pre-approved by the Virgin Islands.
EFTA00013855.pdf
A letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated June 19, 2009. The letter seeks to clarify ambiguous provisions within Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically Paragraph 8 regarding waivers of liability and potential civil claims. Lefkowitz argues that the waiver applies to single violations rather than multiple asserted violations and reserves the right to use statute of limitations defenses.
EFTA00013801.pdf
This document is a legal rebuttal from Kirkland & Ellis LLP regarding the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues that the DOJ's review was not independent, alleges prosecutorial misconduct regarding victim notification and the selection of victim representatives (citing a conflict of interest involving an AUSA's boyfriend), and disputes the government's characterization of the sexual conduct. The document also details the defense's objections to the government's threat to terminate the agreement if Epstein did not comply with unilaterally modified terms by June 2, 2008.
EFTA00013689.pdf
This document is an Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It clarifies provisions related to the selection and payment of an independent attorney representative for the victims identified in the agreement. Epstein agrees to pay the customary hourly rates for this representative, but specifies that this obligation ceases if the representative pursues contested litigation (such as lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. s 2255) against him. The document is signed by Epstein and his counsel on October 29, 2007, and by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (signature redacted) on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta on October 30, 2007.
EFTA00013680.pdf
This is the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the United States (represented by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein. In exchange for Epstein pleading guilty to state charges of solicitation of prostitution and serving a 30-month sentence (including jail and community control), the federal government agreed not to prosecute him for federal sex trafficking crimes. Crucially, the agreement also granted immunity to any potential co-conspirators (names redacted) and stipulated that the agreement would not be made part of the public record.
EFTA00013623.pdf
This document is a letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to retired Judge Edward B. Davis, confirming Davis's appointment as a Special Master. The letter outlines the terms of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically identifying that the U.S. government has identified 34 victims. It details Epstein's agreement to pay for an attorney representative for these victims and waive liability contests in specific civil suits, provided the victims proceed under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
EFTA00013595.pdf
This document contains correspondence from attorney Brad Edwards to the U.S. Attorney's Office in July 2008 regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards disputes the government's proposed stipulation of facts, specifically regarding when victims were notified of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and asserts that he and his clients were kept in the dark about the NPA while urging federal charges. The attached July 3rd letter formally requests federal prosecution, characterizing Epstein as a prolific predator who abused over 100 girls, arguing that the state plea deal was grossly inadequate.
EFTA00013431.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and a support staff member. The AUSA is seeking access to an expired NBC News video interview titled 'How British teen model was lured into Jeffrey Epstein's web.' The respondent notes the video is not in their monitoring system but offers to reach out to contacts at NBC to obtain a copy for internal use.
EFTA00013394.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on August 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It commands the Sacramento County Clerk/Recorder to appear in court on November 29, 2021, and to produce a birth certificate for a specific individual whose name has been redacted.
EFTA00013272.pdf
Court order from April 2019 in the case of United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione (Epstein's future cellmate). Judge Kenneth Karas orders the Bureau of Prisons to withhold attorney work-product and legal visitation logs from federal prosecutors to protect the defendant's legal strategy. The order applies to the MCC, MDC, and potential transfer facilities like Westchester County Correctional Facility.
EFTA00011444.pdf
This document is an email sent on January 28, 2021, by an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email, with the subject 'Maxwell motions 1 of 3', transmits attachments related to pretrial motions, including a cover letter addressed to Judge Nathan dated January 25, 2021. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00011418.pdf
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
EFTA00011163.pdf
An email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to a colleague regarding 'Defense MIL 4'. The sender requests a discussion on how to respond to the defense's motion, noting the recipient had briefed a similar issue previously. The email includes an attachment titled '4._Motion_to_Exclude_Accuser-3_Evidence.pdf', likely relating to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00011140.pdf
An email sent on October 15, 2021, by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email circulates a final draft of a government letter regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (Rule 412 Letter) for review and edits. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00011140.
EFTA00011137.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter received from a lawyer for an alleged victim regarding trial attendance and establishes protocols for public and victim access during the trial, including COVID-19 measures and overflow rooms. Contact information is provided for Wendy Olson (Victim Witness Unit) and Joseph Pecorino (District Executive's Office) to coordinate access for victims and the defendant's family.
EFTA00011135.pdf
This document contains an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence involves the submission of a joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire questions, with Judge Nathan's chambers requesting Word document versions. Additionally, the Assistant United States Attorney confirms the production of Jencks Act material and exhibits to the defense.
EFTA00011113.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).
EFTA00010965.pdf
An email thread from July 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and unknown recipients regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant US Attorney provides the grand jury return for a superseding indictment, noting it is unsealed and was presented to Judge Nathan. A subsequent email requests the immediate docketing of the indictment on ECF to ensure notice is given before the defendant's upcoming arraignment.
EFTA00010383.pdf
This document is a court subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Dated July 13, 2021, it commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear in person on November 29, 2021, at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify.
EFTA00010379.pdf
An internal email dated August 3, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a colleague. The email confirms the drop-off of an envelope containing a discovery drive returned by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys following his death, in accordance with a protective order.
EFTA00010243.pdf
This is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) issued on October 5, 2021, to The Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida. It demands the production of employment records regarding a redacted individual for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance/production date is set for November 29, 2021.
EFTA00010224.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20CR330) to an undisclosed recipient (likely an administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program). The subpoena demands the production of materials submitted by accusers to the EVCP, including claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol' (dated May 29, 2020), which details the rules, eligibility requirements, and procedures for victims seeking compensation from the Epstein Estate, noting that the program is voluntary, independent, and confidential.
EFTA00010214.pdf
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form dated November 12, 2021, submitted to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements, including a hotel, for an unnamed fact witness residing in the continental US to appear in SDNY for trial preparation on December 7, 2021, and trial testimony on December 8-9, 2021. The document specifies the witness is not a victim-witness, not facing criminal charges, and has no unusual travel expenses.
EFTA00010159.pdf
This document is an email dated November 16, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to notify the defense of an additional discovery production, including testifying and non-testifying witness materials, sent via USAfx. It also notes that a hard drive provided by the defense will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell's use.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity