United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014861.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida. It cites the United States Attorney's Manual and the specific language of the agreement, authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, to demonstrate that there was no intention to bind other federal districts from prosecuting Epstein. The document emphasizes that the agreement's scope is explicitly confined to 'this District' and defers to prosecution by the State of Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00008421.jpg
This is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal document filed on December 17, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The document is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach representing the Southern District of New York. It notes that items 'have been read into the record' and indicates a copy was emailed to Defense Counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00008359.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3 of 3) of a legal filing (Document 539) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 12, 2021. It is submitted by Damian Williams, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach. The document indicates a copy was sent to Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00008235.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 526) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 3, 2021. It serves as the signature page for the prosecution, submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00001836.jpg
This document is the second page of a filing from the United States Attorney's Office regarding the conditions of confinement for a defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case number) at the MDC. It details the schedule for legal calls, discovery review, and isolation, asserting that the defendant has more access than other inmates and that the Government is actively communicating with defense counsel regarding any concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00001781.jpg
This document is the final page (Page 3) of a legal filing (Document 60) submitted on October 6, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, requests a delay in disclosing witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense to prevent jeopardizing the ongoing investigation and to encourage victims to come forward. The filing cites Rule 16(d) as the legal basis for this protective measure.
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.
DOJ-OGR-00001629.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Document 22) dated July 13, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues that the defendant poses an extreme flight risk and requests that any application for bail be denied. It is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and colleagues Alex Rossmiller and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001518.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00332-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 6, 2020. It quotes specific portions of prior testimony (likely a deposition) where the defendant denies knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual activities with others and explicitly denies ever giving massages to anyone, including Epstein or '[Minor Victim-2].' The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss, citing Title 18, Section 1623 (False Declarations before a Grand Jury/Court).
DOJ-OGR-00001364.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 6) of a legal filing submitted on July 6, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz on behalf of U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, stating that the Government is willing to provide further details to the Court if necessary.
DOJ-OGR-00001251.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 9) of a legal filing submitted on March 9, 2021, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The filing argues that the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell) poses a substantial flight risk and that their 'Third Bail Motion' should be denied. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00000955.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal memorandum submitted by the United States Government on July 2, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The filing argues that the defendant poses an 'extreme risk of flight' and requests that any application for bail be denied, asserting that no conditions would assure the defendant's presence in court. It is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00000881.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 21-770 filed on March 24, 2021, identifies the plaintiff as the USA. It lists five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the plaintiff, providing their roles, contact information, and office addresses.
DOJ-OGR-00000846.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment against Maxwell, motions for attorneys to appear on her behalf, and a detailed court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the procedures for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order also outlines public and media access to the proceedings via telephone and a limited-capacity video feed at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00000843.jpg
This is a legal document from Case 21-770, dated March 24, 2021. It identifies the plaintiff as the USA and lists the five attorneys from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who are representing the government. The document provides contact information, including addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses, for attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Gainfort Moe, Maurene Ryan Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, and Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00000672.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). An attorney representing victims addresses the court, thanking the Judge and the U.S. Attorney's office for their treatment of the victims. The attorney introduces Courtney Wild, a client who sought help in 2008, to speak to the court; Ms. Wild then spells her name for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00000661.jpg
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00000605.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a Bail Decision hearing held on July 18, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 19 CR 490). Presided over by Judge Richard M. Berman, the document lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Geoffrey S. Berman) and Epstein's defense team (including Martin Weinberg and Michael Miller). Also noted as present are FBI Special Agent Amanda Young, NYPD Detective Paul Byrne, and Pretrial Services Officer John Moscato.
DOJ-OGR-00000583.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing filed on July 24, 2019 (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). It features testimony from Ms. Farmer confirming Jeffrey Epstein's inappropriate conduct toward her. Subsequently, attorney Brad Edwards introduces his client, Courtney Wild, identifying her as the 'Jane Doe' in a 2008 civil lawsuit against the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act connected to Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000565.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning bail conditions for Mr. Epstein. His attorney, Mr. Weinberg, argues that Epstein is not a flight risk, contrasting him with another defendant who lied to pretrial services. Weinberg proposes an additional condition of a credible trustee living in Epstein's home to ensure compliance, in an attempt to persuade the judge to reconsider the detention order.
DOJ-OGR-00000348.jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (likely a bail/detention memorandum) submitted to Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman on July 8, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecution argues for detention based on overwhelming evidence, including an 'extraordinary volume' of nude photographs of minors found at Epstein's New York residence and call records linking him and his agents to victims. The document also argues that the previous Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida does not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting this case.
DOJ-OGR-00000342.jpg
This document is the final page (14) of a government filing dated July 12, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman, arguing against bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The text provides legal precedents establishing that sex trafficking laws (Section 1591) apply to consumers/buyers, not just suppliers, refuting the defense's legal arguments. The conclusion explicitly requests pretrial detention based on Epstein's wealth, flight risk, possession of lewd photos of minors, and history of witness interference.
DOJ-OGR-00000341.jpg
This page from a government filing (July 12, 2019) argues before Judge Berman that a previous plea agreement in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) does not bind other districts or the broader 'United States' government. It further asserts that the defendant (Epstein) was the 'leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise' rather than a mere consumer, highlighting his role in recruiting, funding, and organizing the scheme across two states.
DOJ-OGR-00000315.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, authorized by U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, was limited in scope. It contends the NPA only barred federal prosecution for specific offenses within the Southern District of Florida and did not prevent the United States from bringing other federal criminal charges against him elsewhere. The document quotes the agreement to support its claim that the federal government's ability to prosecute Epstein was not fully relinquished.
DOJ-OGR-00000303.jpg
This document is the signature page of an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. It contains a certification that Epstein has read, understood, and agreed to comply with the clarifications to the agreement. The document is signed by Lilly Ann Sanchez, attorney for Epstein, on October 29, 2007, though it also lists signature blocks for U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, and Gerald Lefcourt.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity