United States Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Probation Office
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Markus
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Professional adversarial cooperative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. CHIUCHIOLO
|
Employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Wendy Olson
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Victims
|
Notifier recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Jointly investigated with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Collusion cooperation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Agreement participant subject to prosecution |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Authority representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Collaborative investigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Client)
|
Proffer agreement participant |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Intervention by the United States Attorney's Office ('the feds'), who forced a deal on Epstein af... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | The United States Attorney's Office intervened and imposed a 'federally-forced deal' on Jeffrey E... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | A 'federally-forced deal' was imposed on Jeffrey Epstein, resulting in a jail sentence and financ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Off... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A non-prosecution agreement was established where federal prosecution against Epstein is deferred... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A deferred prosecution agreement where federal prosecution of Epstein is deferred in favor of pro... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | A joint investigation into Epstein's offenses by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Unit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Potentially fraudulent claims are forwarded to law enforcement agencies for possible investigatio... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of all charges against Epstein in the District if he timely fulfills all terms and cond... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement for deferred prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Epstein's offenses and background by State and Federal law enforcement agencies. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential initiation of prosecution for Epstein if he violates agreement conditions, within 60 da... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of charges against Epstein if all terms and conditions of the agreement are fulfilled, ... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2021-06-30 | Legal filing | The parties jointly submitted a letter to the Court stating they seek no redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of letter regarding redactions on ECF | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Production of discovery material (a photograph) by the Government to the Defense. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Receipt of letter from MOJ confirming accuracy of highlighted language. | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Drafting of Government Opposition to Third Bail Motion | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-03-09 | N/A | Filing deadline for the opposition to the bail application (referenced as 'Tuesday'). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | N/A | Planned filing of the government's memorandum of law in opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's bail mo... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of federal felony charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Filing of detention memorandum in United States v. Maxwell | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-08-30 | N/A | Grand Jury Appearance / Deadline for document production | 40 Foley Square, Room 220, ... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Legal papers filed by the defense and the US Attorney's Office in the Epstein case | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of a civil action against the US Attorney's Office under the Crime Victims' Rights Act | Unknown | View |
EFTA00010149.pdf
This document is an email dated November 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a recipient named Wendy. The email requests travel arrangements for a male fact witness for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, proposing he fly in on the morning of December 8th and depart on the evening of December 10th, with expected testimony dates of December 9th or 10th. The witness's name and specific contact details are redacted.
EFTA00009870.pdf
This document is an email thread from March 2016 between officials at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A Senior Litigation Counsel and Human Trafficking Coordinator initiates a meeting regarding Jeffrey Epstein, which a colleague describes as 'intriguing and complicated.' The thread was forwarded in February 2019.
EFTA00009865.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2020 between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney (likely Maureen Comey) regarding the filing of a victim impact statement. The chain includes the full text of the statement from an unnamed victim opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail, describing Maxwell as a 'psychopath' who groomed and abused the victim as a child and procured victims for Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence coordinates the formatting and timing of filing this statement as an exhibit to the government's opposition to bail.
EFTA00009853.pdf
An email chain from October 2019 involving an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding 'Mark Epstein.' The thread reveals a scheduling miscommunication: the attorney expected a meeting on Monday, Oct 28 at 3:00 PM and asked if the other party was en route, while the respondent claimed the meeting was set for Oct 31.
EFTA00009658.pdf
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of New York. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, strictly regulates the handling of 'Discovery' materials to protect the privacy of uncharged individuals and prevent leaks to the media or internet. It specifically prohibits Epstein from possessing confidential materials outside the presence of his counsel and mandates that defense teams encrypt digital discovery materials.
EFTA00005714.pdf
This FBI document details the coordination and execution of an interview with a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell residing in Australia in March 2011. FBI agents from Miami traveled to Sydney to interview the victim at the U.S. Consulate, followed by a second interview at the victim's residence in Glenning Valley, NSW, where they obtained relevant photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00000243.tif
This document is a Table of Contents for a legal brief or report. It outlines sections discussing the reasons for granting a petition, including arguments about a split among circuits regarding promises made by U.S. Attorney's offices, criticism of a Second Circuit decision, and the case's suitability for resolving a recurring legal question. The document also includes page numbers for each section.
DOJ-OGR-00000231.tif
This document discusses the interpretation and scope of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, emphasizing that it covers potential co-conspirators and assistants. It clarifies that the agreement was made with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, under the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, and not the entire Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00000097.tif
This document is a page from a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007, indicating Jeffrey Epstein's understanding and agreement to its terms. It features signatures and roles of Jeffrey Epstein, his counsels Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, and United States Attorneys R. Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00000089.tif
This document outlines the terms of an agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein's prosecution. It states that the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, R. Alexander Acosta, will defer federal prosecution in favor of the State of Florida, provided Epstein adheres to the agreement's conditions. If Epstein violates the agreement, the US Attorney may initiate prosecution, but if he fulfills all conditions, all charges against him in the Southern District of Florida will be dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00000087.tif
This document is Appendix B of a non-prosecution agreement related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the investigations conducted by local, state, and federal authorities into Epstein's conduct, specifically mentioning charges of solicitation of prostitution and conspiracy to engage in illicit sexual conduct with minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000049.tif
This document, likely a legal petition or brief, discusses the reasons for granting a petition filed by 'Maxwell' after an en banc rehearing was denied. It focuses on a circuit split regarding the binding nature of plea agreements made by a U.S. Attorney's office in one district on other U.S. Attorney's offices. The document cites Santobello v. New York as a precedent suggesting that such promises should be binding across different prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00023135.tif
This document excerpt details concerns raised by Acosta regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, specifically about challenges to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the defense team's tactics. Acosta's letter expresses frustration over the lack of finality and issues being appealed to Department Headquarters, while also setting a deadline of December 7, 2007, for a decision on the Agreement. It also describes Acosta's discussions with OPR and a subsequent response to Acosta from Starr and Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00023124.tif
This document details aspects of an agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein, including his guilty plea timeline, immunity for co-conspirators, and conditions for federal investigation suspension. It also mentions a concern expressed via email by Lefkowitz to Lourie about media leaks prejudicing Epstein and a New York Post report on Epstein's plea deal from October 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023356.tif
This document is an Addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement, signed by Jeffrey Epstein and representatives of the United States Attorney's Office. Epstein acknowledges understanding and agreeing to comply with the clarifications of the agreement. The document is dated October 30, 2007, with signatures from his attorneys dated October 29, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023355.tif
This document is an addendum signed by Jeffrey Epstein on October 30, 2007, certifying his understanding and agreement to comply with clarifications to a Non-Prosecution Agreement. It includes signatures from Jeffrey Epstein, his counsel Gerald Lefcourt (dated October 29, 2007), his attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña on behalf of the United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta.
DOJ-OGR-00023354.tif
This document is an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated October 30, 2007, where Jeffrey Epstein acknowledges understanding and agreeing to its terms. It includes signatures from Jeffrey Epstein, United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña, and Epstein's counsel, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, indicating a formal legal agreement reached between the parties.
DOJ-OGR-00023342.tif
This document outlines an agreement to defer federal prosecution of Epstein in the Southern District of Florida, contingent on his compliance with specific conditions and actions with the State Attorney's Office. The agreement, authorized by R. Alexander Acosta, states that federal prosecution will be deferred in favor of state prosecution, and if Epstein fulfills all terms, federal charges will be dismissed; however, if he violates the agreement, federal prosecution may be initiated.
DOJ-OGR-00023254.tif
This document excerpt details legal arguments and communications surrounding victim notification in the Epstein case in late 2007. It highlights disagreements between legal representatives (Starr, Lefkowitz) and the USAO (Acosta, Villafaña) regarding victim status, notification requirements, and the appropriate compensation mechanisms, with a specific focus on an individual referred to as 'Jane Doe #2' whose attorney was paid by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00023237.tif
This document details Villafaña's process for victim notification in an unspecified case, where she created her own letters and directed FBI agents to deliver them, believing it provided more assistance than legally required. It highlights that these letters were not reviewed by supervisors and that the USAO's Victim Witness Specialist had no direct contact with victims in the Epstein matter, despite Villafaña's claim of having shown the letter to a specialist who approved it. The document also touches upon the USAO's lack of standardized victim notification procedures and the context of Epstein-related CVRA litigation in July 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00023235.tif
This document is a letter from the FBI's West Palm Beach office dated August 28, 2006, informing a recipient named 'Пенг' that they have been identified as a possible victim of a federal crime. The letter outlines the FBI's Victim Assistance Program, explains the criminal justice process, details the recipient's rights under federal law (18 U.S. Code § 3771), and provides instructions for using the Victim Notification System (VNS) to stay updated on the ongoing investigation. Redactions are present for the case number, recipient's full name, and specific identification numbers (VIN and PIN).
DOJ-OGR-00015129.jpg
A legal letter dated August 6, 2025, from attorney Robert S. Glassman to the SDNY Victim and Witness Coordinator regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. Glassman, representing a 'Jane Doe' victim, joins a previous letter submitted by Annie Farmer's attorney and strongly opposes the release of any information that identifies victims, requesting redactions if materials are released.
DOJ-OGR-00015109.jpg
A legal letter dated August 5, 2025, from Edwards Henderson (The Crime Victim Law Firm) addressed to Judge Engelmayer and the SDNY Victim and Witness Coordinator regarding the case USA v Maxwell. The firm represents numerous survivors of Epstein and Maxwell and writes to address the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials, urging the court to protect victims' rights under the CVRA (18 U.S.C. § 3771). The document emphasizes the victims' reliance on the justice system and argues that their rights to be protected from the accused must be considered regarding any disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00015083.jpg
This is a court order filed on August 5, 2025, by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order provides logistical instructions for victims wishing to submit letters regarding the Government's motion to unseal grand jury materials, setting a deadline for submission to the US Attorney's Office by August 5, 2025. It further instructs the Government to hand-deliver these submissions to the Court by August 6, 2025, in both unredacted (sealed) and redacted (public) formats.
DOJ-OGR-00014877.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity