Jeffrey Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
16
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura A. Menninger
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-13 | Court order | Order granting motion for attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to appear Pro Hac Vice for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-13 | Court order | ORDER granting Motion for Jeffrey Pagliuca to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Ghislaine Maxwell was sig... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-01 | N/A | Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020680.jpg
This document is a court docket from October 29, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing numerous pre-trial motions in limine filed by her defense team. The motions aim to exclude various forms of evidence, including testimony about an alleged flight, items from a 2005 search, and any mention of an alleged 'Rape' by Jeffrey Epstein. The docket also records the prosecution's (USA) formal opposition to these motions, illustrating the legal strategies employed by both sides before the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020645.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY detailing filings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between January 25, 2021, and February 4, 2021. It lists numerous motions to dismiss filed by the defense, letters regarding confidentiality redactions, and a dispute regarding the defendant's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn, which the judge resolved by denying the BOP's request to vacate a prior order. The document also notes a motion to suppress evidence obtained via a subpoena to a redacted entity.
DOJ-OGR-00020635.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between August 18 and September 2, 2020. It details various motions and orders, specifically Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to unseal victim identities and be moved to the Bureau of Prisons' general population. The docket also records attorney appearances for the prosecution and procedural filings regarding protective orders and sealing requests.
DOJ-OGR-00020631.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 22, 2023, but detailing events from July 2020. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public and press access to hearings, followed by a list of filings such as attorney appearances and motions. The key event is a minute entry for Maxwell's arraignment on July 14, 2020, where she pleaded not guilty via video conference, was denied bail, and had a trial date set for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020572.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings related to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between March 10, 2022, and April 1, 2022. It details various motions including a Motion for New Trial filed by the defense, the government's opposition, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to protect juror anonymity. The document also lists legal team members for both sides and references transcripts and sealed documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020564.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from January 2022 detailing post-trial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It focuses heavily on 'Juror Number 50' (Juror 50), who retained private counsel (Todd Spodek) amid discussions of a potential new trial based on juror issues. Judge Nathan issued several orders scheduling briefings on whether a juror inquiry is required and temporarily sealing Juror 50's motion to intervene.
DOJ-OGR-00020555.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 24, 2021, for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists several filings, including letters regarding protective orders, an order for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program to produce documents, and a motion by the prosecution to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall, along with the defense's response. The docket also confirms the trial's start date of November 29, 2021, and outlines COVID-19 protocols for courthouse entry.
DOJ-OGR-00020546.jpg
This document is a court docket from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing numerous filings entered on November 12, 2021. The entries primarily consist of motions in limine from both the defense (Maxwell's team) and the prosecution (USA) to include or exclude specific evidence, testimony, and exhibits, such as items from a 2005 search and statements from an alleged co-conspirator. The docket also includes a memo endorsement from Judge Alison J. Nathan ordering the submission of lists and redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020535.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330), covering filings and orders between October 15 and October 20, 2021. Key activities include scheduling motions regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence), filings related to 'Motions in Limine' and 'Voir Dire' (jury selection), and the scheduling of a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection logistics. The document also lists specific public access phone numbers for the proceedings and explicitly prohibits recording.
DOJ-OGR-00020508.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00020463.jpg
This document is a docket sheet segment from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from January 5, 2022, to January 14, 2022. It details judicial orders regarding post-trial motions, specifically focusing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror Number 50, the appointment of counsel for said juror, and scheduling for related briefings. The document records Judge Alison J. Nathan's decisions to manage the inquiry into the juror's statements and the handling of related motions under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00020454.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing a series of court filings and orders entered on November 24, 2021. Key events include orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial procedures and COVID-19 protocols, the production of materials from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and motions filed by the prosecution (USA) to preclude the expert testimony of Dr. Ryan Hall. The filings demonstrate active pre-trial legal maneuvering by both the prosecution and the defense just before the trial's scheduled start on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020446.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referencing SDNY Case 20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021, detailing proceedings in the case USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists filings related to various Motions in Limine regarding the exclusion of evidence (including items from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way), suppression of identification, and expert testimony. It also contains a court order establishing protocols for an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including COVID-19 measures and provisions for public and victim access via overflow rooms.
DOJ-OGR-00020445.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of filings entered on November 12, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries primarily consist of numerous motions in limine filed by Maxwell's defense to exclude various pieces of evidence, testimony, and government exhibits, as well as motions and responses from the prosecution (USA). The docket also includes a memo endorsement by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding trial logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020438.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from October 29, 2021, for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists numerous pre-trial motions (motions in limine) filed by Maxwell's defense team, led by attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca, to exclude various pieces of evidence and testimony. These include attempts to suppress identification, preclude expert testimony, prevent references to accusers as "victims," and block testimony about an alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. The document also records the prosecution's (USA) responses to these motions and a joint letter from prosecutors to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00020408.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet dated February 4, 2021, listing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan requiring the docketing of redacted documents, followed by a series of defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on arguments including due process, perjury, pre-indictment delay, and breach of a non-prosecution agreement. The filings identify Maxwell's attorneys as Jeffrey Pagliuca and Mark Cohen.
DOJ-OGR-00020407.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021. It details the defense filing twelve pre-trial motions, including requests for separate trials, dismissal of counts due to multiplicity and lack of specificity, and dismissal based on Sixth Amendment violations. The document also records a dispute involving the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC Brooklyn regarding laptop access for the defendant, resulting in the Judge denying the BOP's request to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00020395.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from July 9 to July 15, 2020. It details the arraignment held on July 14, 2020, where Maxwell pleaded Not Guilty via video conference due to COVID-19 protocols, and Judge Alison J. Nathan denied bail, remanding Maxwell to custody. The docket also records attorney appearances for the defense (Cohen, Everdell, Pagliuca) and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00016152.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, specifically the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the jury must focus solely on Maxwell's alleged actions, not Epstein's, and contends the government's case is built on the unreliable testimony of four accusers whose memories have been corrupted over time and who are motivated by money.
DOJ-OGR-00015539.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015166.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification regarding the filing of a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 under seal and plans to notify alleged victims' counsel.
Response to Government Letters dated May 4, and May 6, 20...
Defense response arguing for the production of a journal, boots, and photographs, and criticizing the government's handling of evidence controlled by BSF.
Response to the Government’s October 7, 2020 letter, Unit...
Complaint regarding the Government's failure to meet discovery deadlines and promises regarding files from the Southern District of Florida.
Reply in Support of Request to Modify Protective Order (U...
Legal argument regarding the disclosure of information to a 'Civil Litigation' party about materials handed over to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Request to Modify Protective Order (UNDER SEAL) - United ...
Request for an Order allowing Maxwell to refer to and file under seal certain discovery materials in redacted 'Other Matters'.
Modification of Protective Order
Motion seeking modification of protective order and to file under seal.
Request to Modify Protective Order
Requesting permission to disclose certain discovery materials under seal to Judge Preska in civil case.
Local Criminal Rule 23.1
Requesting order prohibiting Government/agents from making extrajudicial statements.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel to the presiding judge requesting an order to prohibit the Government, its agents, and witnesses' counsel from making extrajudicial statements that could be prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (...
A request to the Court to issue an order prohibiting the Government, its agents, and counsel for witnesses from making extrajudicial statements about the case to protect Ghislaine Maxwell's right to a fair trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity